2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

ITB question I don't think has been answered

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 16, 2009 | 12:49 AM
  #1  
skoebl's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
From: South West Oregon
ITB question I don't think has been answered

So as the title suggests I'm working on get and ITB setup going. I have an extra UIM laying around and was wondering if I could just unbolt the dynamic chamber and use the rest of it as my pipes.
Would I be better off just bending my own pipes and fabbing up a mounting bracket for it? Or does anyone think it will work alright?
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2009 | 01:15 AM
  #2  
pyro_racer_0016's Avatar
touge******
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
From: St. Charles, Missouri
Originally Posted by skoebl
So as the title suggests I'm working on get and ITB setup going. I have an extra UIM laying around and was wondering if I could just unbolt the dynamic chamber and use the rest of it as my pipes.
Would I be better off just bending my own pipes and fabbing up a mounting bracket for it? Or does anyone think it will work alright?
Are you still using the 5th and 6th port acctuators if so then fab a plate to bot to the lower intake manifold and bend short individual tubes then mount the ITBs.

If you have the 5th and 6th ports wired open then fab a plate where your LIM mounts to the block and bend short tubes to the top of the block and mount your ITBs. I had a friend do it this way and make a box around the velocity stacks and put seal on top with a turbo II hood scoop.
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2009 | 01:32 AM
  #3  
skoebl's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
From: South West Oregon
Yeah I still plan on using the 6th ports. Haven't decided completely as I'm not sure if I could overcome the difference in driveability on the street with the megasquirt setup I'm installing.
IIRC wiring the ports open makes your low end kinda suck right? (on a stock motor with stock ecu)...so I shooould be able to make a fuel map that compensates for that....right?
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2009 | 12:19 PM
  #4  
pyro_racer_0016's Avatar
touge******
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
From: St. Charles, Missouri
it will still be kind of boggy but you can but you won't have that surge at 3000 rpm the power will ramp up smoothly
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2009 | 01:40 PM
  #5  
wrankin's Avatar
Old Rotary Dog
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,461
Likes: 2
From: Durham, NC
Originally Posted by skoebl
IIRC wiring the ports open makes your low end kinda suck right?
You lose torque due to decrease intake velocity.

(on a stock motor with stock ecu)...so I shooould be able to make a fuel map that compensates for that....right?
No, you can't. Not fully. It has to do with intake air velocity rather than fuel.

-b
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2009 | 02:20 PM
  #6  
skoebl's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
From: South West Oregon
Originally Posted by wrankin
No, you can't. Not fully. It has to do with intake air velocity rather than fuel.

-b

Lame...well alright that's very good to know. I think I'll just keep them operating as they should
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Queppa
New Member RX-7 Technical
11
Nov 18, 2024 03:47 AM
trickster
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
25
Jul 1, 2023 04:40 PM
elfking
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
3
Aug 19, 2015 09:48 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:46 PM.