2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

highest "cc" s-afc can control?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 24, 2001 | 06:12 AM
  #1  
RX-7 GT's Avatar
Thread Starter
HyperREV.com
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,162
Likes: 0
From: Oregon
highest "cc" s-afc can control?

what is the highest cc (injector size for retards...yes node this means you ) the s-afc can control? cause im doing a 60-1 at around 12psi was thinkin of going with 1200cc secondaries or just leaving secondaries stock and going with a an aic and plumbing em in the manifold.

if it can handle em that would be great , save me money off those damn expensive aic's. and if it cant handle em anyone know of something that can? im planning on going with the haltech aic if all else fails
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2001 | 05:18 PM
  #2  
fc3s.org's Avatar
OG
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,350
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte NC
I would go AIC and get 2 more 550's and you will be fine. Really you should be going Haltech or WOlf at this point ya know Like I should talk though hehe
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2001 | 06:38 PM
  #3  
RX-7 GT's Avatar
Thread Starter
HyperREV.com
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,162
Likes: 0
From: Oregon
actually no i dont have to go haltech this is my budget car 2 additional 550cc's for 350hp is not enough
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2001 | 07:20 PM
  #4  
13BAce's Avatar
On a long vacation
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,160
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA, U.S.A.
Re: highest "cc" s-afc can control?

Originally posted by RX-7 GT
what is the highest cc (injector size for retards...yes node this means you ) the s-afc can control? cause im doing a 60-1 at around 12psi was thinkin of going with 1200cc secondaries or just leaving secondaries stock and going with a an aic and plumbing em in the manifold.

if it can handle em that would be great , save me money off those damn expensive aic's. and if it cant handle em anyone know of something that can? im planning on going with the haltech aic if all else fails
720 cc injectors are the biggest I would go with using a SAFC. Ted K has a SAFC running 4 720's with a modified stock turbo. Dale Clark, http://rx7.freeservers.com/ , has a 60-1 hi-fi with an
F-CON and AIC running 2 extra 550 cc injectors. He also has a SAFC to fine tune things. His setup seems to work well. For the price of an AIC, injectors, etc. you'll be close to the price of a standalone ECU.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2001 | 07:38 PM
  #5  
RX-7 GT's Avatar
Thread Starter
HyperREV.com
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,162
Likes: 0
From: Oregon
actually haltech has an aic for $350
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2001 | 08:15 PM
  #6  
13BAce's Avatar
On a long vacation
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,160
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA, U.S.A.
Originally posted by RX-7 GT
actually haltech has an aic for $350
I forgot about that one.
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2001 | 12:35 AM
  #7  
sickboy's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
From: I was banned for being stupid!!!!
hahaha. well for starters 1200s wont work on TII, they are side feed injectors. you'll need 1600s if you want to go <1000cc's. and i wouldnt even think of trying to get an SAFC to deal with those. leaned out 50% youd still have too much fuel. you should REALLY consider some form of REAL EFI as opposed to band aids. because by the time you add all the **** u need to half *** a fuel system, you could have bought a haltech.

and i speak from experience because i used to run the alphabet soup fuel system on my car..............and u see what im runnin now
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bauer778
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
10
Nov 4, 2015 04:42 PM
alexdimen
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
20
Oct 23, 2015 01:50 PM
frijol
Microtech
7
Sep 23, 2015 12:51 PM
Heedlessone
Group Buy & Product Dev. FD RX-7
0
Sep 16, 2015 11:31 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:14 AM.