Gain power by converting to an e-fan?
#1
Powered By Trochoids
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Philly | PA
Posts: 1,457
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Gain power by converting to an e-fan?
Is there any truth in this? It seems logical since you wont have the regular fan connected to the eshaft so there would be a bit less loss going on...
#3
Boost ahoy!
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Joplin, MO
Posts: 968
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#6
Boost ahoy!
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Joplin, MO
Posts: 968
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#8
Technician
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,008
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
About the only thing you gain off of a stock clutch fan is room. If you want you can check out my project to see what I mean. You'll definatly put strain on the electrical system, but other than that you just gain room to work and the ability to run whatever you want through about 3 cubic feet or more.
#9
Rotary Freak
iTrader: (1)
The problem of an e-fan using engine energy less efficiently than the stock, working clutch fan is compounded by the fact when cooling needs are high - eg, idling in traffic - , the alternator on these cars barely keeps up with demand just to run the engine electrical system, lights, and so on. Ever noticed how just hitting the brakes when idling hot causes the revs to sag, then return to a slightly higher point? That's because just the load of the brake lights on the alternator slows the engine significantly - proof that load on the alternator makes the engine work harder. The surge that follows the sag is an idle compensator, just like for the A/C, that Mazda designed in, recognizing that at electrical loads at idle tax the alternator/charging system. An e-fan is going to tax the charging system further precisely when it is least able to compensate - low engine/vehicle speeds.
#10
Engine, Not Motor
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 29,789
Likes: 0
Received 108 Likes
on
91 Posts
The alternator only supplies the amount of current that the car is drawing...That is, a 70A alternator does not always "push" 70A out into the electrical system. If the electrical draw from the car is only 50A, then only 50A will be produced from the alternator.
This is why cars with flakey (or missing) BAC valves have idle dropping issues under heavy electrical load. Switching in a high current item like the headlights, defroster grid or e-fan causes the idle to fall as the load on the engine increases.
#11
B O R I C U A
iTrader: (14)
If i was to follow your theory, a stock FC with a 90amp sound system, e fan, AC & headlights on; will barely move...
Yes, as load to the engine increases.
#12
Engine, Not Motor
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 29,789
Likes: 0
Received 108 Likes
on
91 Posts
The relationship between how hard it is to turn the shaft vs. how much current is drawn from the alternator is basically linear. The shaft becomes harder to turn as you draw more current, up to the maximum current the alternator can produce. If you had a weak source of mechanical power (small engine, human) then you could draw enough power to drag the shaft down to the point where it could not be turned...Actually 90A at 12V is only 1080 watts, or about 1.3 HP. Most humans could provide this much energy for at least a few minutes...
I'm not sure what this means...Also it's not a theory, but elecromechanical fact.
Yes, because more mechanical energy is being input into the alternator.
If i was to follow your theory, a stock FC with a 90amp sound system, e fan, AC & headlights on; will barely move...
I am not going to lie, since i don't know if thats true or not; however I know that has RPM increases, so do the alternators amp output.
#13
B O R I C U A
iTrader: (14)
THANK YOU!
So in conclusion an e-fan amp draw is next to nothing or in the decimal range. If 90amps is equivalent to 1.3hp; then 45amp is equivalent to 0.75hp.
So in reality an efan might cost you what, 0.35hp? A couple of things come to mind, can't think of a single person that can notice the difference between 0.35hp. The second thing that comes to mind is, the loss of HP on an efan setup cancels out with the extra weight that the eshaft is carrying with the stock fan setup, and\or any drag that it might cause on the engine.
So in conclusion an e-fan amp draw is next to nothing or in the decimal range. If 90amps is equivalent to 1.3hp; then 45amp is equivalent to 0.75hp.
So in reality an efan might cost you what, 0.35hp? A couple of things come to mind, can't think of a single person that can notice the difference between 0.35hp. The second thing that comes to mind is, the loss of HP on an efan setup cancels out with the extra weight that the eshaft is carrying with the stock fan setup, and\or any drag that it might cause on the engine.
#14
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Yeah but if the stock fan absorbs 18hp (exageration) and the electric one which in reality draws ~15A running, then you would be gaining a decent amount. But what someone needs to do is head over to a dyno and make 3 runs, get an average, remove the stock clutch fan and make 3 more runs and take that average and that might give a good indication of how much energy it takes to drive the clutch fan, than inverse the drivetrain loss to get RWHP... anyone wanna take a guess?
#15
Bongolio
The relationship between how hard it is to turn the shaft vs. how much current is drawn from the alternator is basically linear. The shaft becomes harder to turn as you draw more current, up to the maximum current the alternator can produce. If you had a weak source of mechanical power (small engine, human) then you could draw enough power to drag the shaft down to the point where it could not be turned...Actually 90A at 12V is only 1080 watts, or about 1.3 HP. Most humans could provide this much energy for at least a few minutes....
Damnit i never thought of it like that!! Thats pretty cool.
#17
Bongolio
#20
Boost ahoy!
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Joplin, MO
Posts: 968
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I wouldn't take it out if it works. It's not enough to give you enough HP, if it's just sitting there....that's like taking out the carpet in your hatch and expecting a 10 hp gain :p
#21
Engine, Not Motor
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 29,789
Likes: 0
Received 108 Likes
on
91 Posts
0.35hp. The second thing that comes to mind is, the loss of HP on an efan setup cancels out with the extra weight that the eshaft is carrying with the stock fan setup, and\or any drag that it might cause on the engine.
#23
B O R I C U A
iTrader: (14)
Basically, yes. But neither does the mechanical fan. That's sort of the point I try to make in the writeup. If the mechanical fan really did draw several HP, several HP worth of electrical power must be drawn from the alternator to do the same physical work (ignoring differences in fan blade efficiency based on different designs). So in truth neither one really takes that much power...
When talking about drag, yes you are right; however its weight will always be a burden on the e-shaft.