2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

Gah!!!! A/f!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 28, 2004 | 08:54 PM
  #26  
gsracer's Avatar
EIT
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,790
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
Originally posted by NZConvertible
I'd just replace the sensor. If the connection's bad you'll just get nothing. It's highly unlikely a basically stock car is going to blow up due to lean mixtures. If you're really worried, get it dyno'd.

A lack of understanding does not make something worthless. You think it's worthless because you want to use it for reading full-load mixtures. That's like saying a an oil pressure gauge is worthless because you want to use it to read oil temps. Not only does a working O2 sensor make the engine run better and use less gas, it can be used to spot mixture changes that indicate probems. How is that worthless?

Persoannly I wouldn't waste my money buying a brand-name A/F meter, because I don't think they're that important, but the $10 DIY one I have does the job perfectly.
I wouldn't spend money on an autometer guage, or anything else that converts the stock narrowbands sensor into an air/fuel ratio. I stated already that it makes a lot more sense to me to simply look at the voltages coming into the ecu with a multimeter. A $10 DIY is cheap and yes, could be useful ensuring the car is going into closed loop.

I don't like advocating narrowband o2 sensors, because for one reason or another people start getting the idea that it's ok to tune by these. When I say tune, I'm implying WOT situations. Most people don't give a second glance at tuning for cruise, or light throttle situations. If tuning for light throttle is necessary, a wideband can easily be used for that as well.
Reply
Old May 29, 2004 | 12:17 AM
  #27  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
Originally posted by gsracer
I stated already that it makes a lot more sense to me to simply look at the voltages coming into the ecu with a multimeter.
A DMM is far too useful to have permanently mounted in a car. A simple 10-LED meter like mine performs the same function, costs less, is far smaller, and isn't needed for anything else.
I don't like advocating narrowband o2 sensors, because for one reason or another people start getting the idea that it's ok to tune by these.
By that you sound like you're implying I do. I have never suggested anyone use a narrow-band sensor for tuning purposes. I have always suggested tuning be done on a dyno by a professional with a wide-band. I don't like suggesting people do their own tuning with their own wide-band, as there's far more to tuning that just have an accurate A/F meter. Most people here don't have the knowledge or experience to maximise engine potential and still be safe.

What annoys me is when people make ridiculous statements like "A/F gauges are useless/worthless", because this usually means they don't really know what they're talking about. If you mean "narrow-band sensors shouldn't be used for tuning purposes" then say that! Simply calling them worthless (implying worthless for anything) is BS.

Last edited by NZConvertible; May 29, 2004 at 12:27 AM.
Reply
Old May 29, 2004 | 12:41 AM
  #28  
gsracer's Avatar
EIT
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,790
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
[B]A DMM is far too useful to have permanently mounted in a car. A simple 10-LED meter like mine performs the same function, costs less, is far smaller, and isn't needed for anything else.
By that you sound like you're implying I do. I have never suggested anyone use a narrow-band sensor for tuning purposes. I have always suggested tuning be done on a dyno by a professional with a wide-band. I don't like suggesting people do their own tuning with their own wide-band, as there's far more to tuning that just have an accurate A/F meter. Most people here don't have the knowledge or experience to maximise engine potential and still be safe.
I wouldn't advocate permamently mounting a multimeter in the car, I agree with you. In this situation, it would help to diagnose a whacked out narrowband o2 sensor that needs to be replaced. I'm not against narrowband o2 sensors, but they just aren't that important IMO compared to other things you could be monitoring.

I wasn't trying to imply that you suggest people tune thier cars via narrowband air/fuel guages. I also agree, that there is much more to tuning an engine than having a fancy wideband read out.

However, I do think some of the more notable members on this forum tend to be overly cautious in regards to tuning. If someone running minor bolt-on's has a safc and a wideband, assuming they posses an average knowledge of efi, I'd trust them peform minor changes and not blow anything up.

What annoys me is when people make ridiculous statements like "A/F gauges are useless/worthless", because this usually means they don't really know what they're talking about. If you mean "narrow-band sensors shouldn't be used for tuning purposes" then say that! Simply calling them worthless (implying worthless for anything) is BS.
Sure a/f guages can help diagnose problems with a car. I just don't want people to use them for a purpose they weren't designed for. You'd be surprised how many people I know that have tried tuning a car at WOT with an autometer light show.
Reply
Old May 29, 2004 | 01:00 AM
  #29  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
Originally posted by gsracer
I do think some of the more notable members on this forum tend to be overly cautious in regards to tuning. If someone running minor bolt-on's has a safc and a wideband, assuming they posses an average knowledge of efi, I'd trust them peform minor changes and not blow anything up.
You have more faith than me then. If someone wants to have a go then that's up to them.
Sure a/f guages can help diagnose problems with a car. I just don't want people to use them for a purpose they weren't designed for. You'd be surprised how many people I know that have tried tuning a car at WOT with an autometer light show.
I'd just prefer to give people all the info on O2 sensors, rather than just dismiss them because of the ignorance of others. But I think we're pretty much both on the same wavelength here.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Queppa
New Member RX-7 Technical
11
Nov 18, 2024 03:47 AM
alphawolff
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
17
Nov 17, 2015 05:57 PM
t-von
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
9
Sep 10, 2015 01:56 PM
puma
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
4
Oct 10, 2001 06:45 AM
Mazda2ndgen
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
2
Aug 24, 2001 11:17 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:13 AM.