2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

FB cost vs FC cost

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 23, 2004 | 12:41 AM
  #1  
87whiteyrx's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: Avella Pa
FB cost vs FC cost

I need to really know, I have had 3 FBs and they can bleed you dry. Is the FC any worse? I have heard about the electrical gremlins. I don't know if I want to get in and out of a first gen. any more and am ready to make my next toy a second gen. Is there any reason not to get an FC? I know they are getting old so the regular stuff is in need of repair, It's the odd things that might be hard to find or really expensive that I'm worried about.
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2004 | 01:14 AM
  #2  
Tofuball's Avatar
Jesus is the Messiah
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 4,848
Likes: 0
From: Silver Spring, MD
The only major thing my FC cost on me was a blown heater hose.

Everything else has been upgrades :-p

The NA ones are nice and reliable
My friends with the TIIs are always tweaking something . . .
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2004 | 02:27 AM
  #3  
Dan H's Avatar
Zoom Zoom Boom!
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,312
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco, CA
Cost of maintenance and number of problems is about the same with FB and FC. Parts are very easy to find for both especially for the FC.

If you get a Turbo II however, its going to cost you quite a bit more.
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2004 | 10:25 AM
  #4  
sub9lulu's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,739
Likes: 2
From: FL
well mine n/a cost me quite a bit here and there.
always have something blown and i have to listen to every single noise that the car makes and watch all the gauges all the time, check the fluids weekly.... thats about it.
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2004 | 10:28 AM
  #5  
$150FC's Avatar
Currently Winning
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,438
Likes: 0
From: Birmingham, AL
It depends greatly on the care the car recieved earlier in life, I think. Third or fourth owner cars that were raped earlier in life and taken care of poorly will generally be in worse condition.

If you find the right car, you're better off. But that's the case with all cars.
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2004 | 10:38 AM
  #6  
asherwood's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 959
Likes: 0
From: Victoria, BC, Canada
Never had a FB but...

I have had my N/A FC for 3 years now, I would have to second the earlier comment that it depends on how the car was taken care of before you took ownership.

Mine was fairly well maintained and I am the second owner, still there was some maintenance issues that will always need to be done on a car built before 1991.

Most of the money I have spent has been my choice, my fault for always wanting to 'restore' things to almost new status. As you know, unless you have some reasonable mechanical skills a car will cost you some bucks for maintenace, and with these the engines are particular on how they get treated.

I have never owned a turbo car, but would have to agree that a tuned up N/A in good condition should be a reliable but FUN ride!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
renjiv2
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
57
Jan 25, 2024 03:34 AM
joel(PA)
Group Buy & Product Dev. FD RX-7
8
Oct 4, 2015 06:07 PM
NickNac113
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
13
Oct 1, 2015 09:25 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:10 PM.