Dynoed @220rwhp with only a few mods
#77
SOLD THE RX-7!
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 7,451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by importboi22
so that leads me to beleive that the computer WILL NOT let the injectors open more than 63% duty dont you?
so that leads me to beleive that the computer WILL NOT let the injectors open more than 63% duty dont you?
the 86-88 turbo II making 183 hp. the 550cc's open to 56% duty
and the 89-91 making 200 hp. opens to 63%...
make more power with either. and both ecus will go alot over 63%....
and for the main post on this. there is no way you should be going lean at 10psi at 5000rpm... something else is wrong with your car. my S-afc at 10psi with stock injectors and FD pump is in the negitive %. as in I leaned it out!...
#78
i am not a girl
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: CT
Posts: 1,916
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
at 38 psi in the rail with the 13.2 AFR with 550 cc injectors and 220whp or about 275 flywheel hp they should be either maxxed or running close to it...u cant calculate this percicely since there is not enouf data...so on the car it should be diffrent.
like i said before, his fuel pump is either not working right, is wired wrong, or his injectors are clogged, getting a fuel pressure gauge will help diagnose the problem further...
like i said before, his fuel pump is either not working right, is wired wrong, or his injectors are clogged, getting a fuel pressure gauge will help diagnose the problem further...
Last edited by Kahren; 03-12-03 at 11:50 PM.
#79
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Scott 89t2- you realize the 88 T2 was under rated in the US right? I dynoed 178rwhp STOCK, 5.5 psi, and so have many other people, so that comes out to around 215 flywheel hp, which was the hp in japan's infini...
#80
Originally posted by Scott 89t2
when it says the stock ecu runs at 56-63% that means that...
the 86-88 turbo II making 183 hp. the 550cc's open to 56% duty
and the 89-91 making 200 hp. opens to 63%...
make more power with either. and both ecus will go alot over 63%....
and for the main post on this. there is no way you should be going lean at 10psi at 5000rpm... something else is wrong with your car. my S-afc at 10psi with stock injectors and FD pump is in the negitive %. as in I leaned it out!...
when it says the stock ecu runs at 56-63% that means that...
the 86-88 turbo II making 183 hp. the 550cc's open to 56% duty
and the 89-91 making 200 hp. opens to 63%...
make more power with either. and both ecus will go alot over 63%....
and for the main post on this. there is no way you should be going lean at 10psi at 5000rpm... something else is wrong with your car. my S-afc at 10psi with stock injectors and FD pump is in the negitive %. as in I leaned it out!...
#81
Pew Pew Pew
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: sunshine coast Australia
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i got my car dynoed and i thought that was low for my mods (below) found out later on that my car is running really rich 10:1 a/f ive had it tuned a bit but nothing major and it goes heaps better. i also just bought a FMIC and its going on soon and with a dyno im hoping to get aleast 250rwhp
#82
B O R I C U A
iTrader: (14)
Originally posted by T210thAnniv
Scott 89t2- you realize the 88 T2 was under rated in the US right? I dynoed 178rwhp STOCK, 5.5 psi, and so have many other people, so that comes out to around 215 flywheel hp, which was the hp in japan's infini...
Scott 89t2- you realize the 88 T2 was under rated in the US right? I dynoed 178rwhp STOCK, 5.5 psi, and so have many other people, so that comes out to around 215 flywheel hp, which was the hp in japan's infini...
#83
Lives on the Forum
Originally posted by ///3oris
Rememmber, I never claimed to be an FC expert here... but 10psi isn't really much at all.. not nearly enough to run 14psi, and seems based on Sandors car, to not even be that safe for 10psi.
Rememmber, I never claimed to be an FC expert here... but 10psi isn't really much at all.. not nearly enough to run 14psi, and seems based on Sandors car, to not even be that safe for 10psi.
-Ted
#84
Lives on the Forum
Originally posted by ///3oris
Rememmber, I never claimed to be an FC expert here... but 10psi isn't really much at all.. not nearly enough to run 14psi, and seems based on Sandors car, to not even be that safe for 10psi.
Rememmber, I never claimed to be an FC expert here... but 10psi isn't really much at all.. not nearly enough to run 14psi, and seems based on Sandors car, to not even be that safe for 10psi.
-Ted
#85
Lives on the Forum
Originally posted by ///3oris
Rememmber, I never claimed to be an FC expert here... but 10psi isn't really much at all.. not nearly enough to run 14psi, and seems based on Sandors car, to not even be that safe for 10psi.
Rememmber, I never claimed to be an FC expert here... but 10psi isn't really much at all.. not nearly enough to run 14psi, and seems based on Sandors car, to not even be that safe for 10psi.
-Ted
#87
Yeah, I've noticed a big decrease in gas mileage.
Gsracer: maybe you should keep your post counting to yourself, or find a new hobby... we don't need people stating the obvious.
Gsracer: maybe you should keep your post counting to yourself, or find a new hobby... we don't need people stating the obvious.
#89
Originally posted by madaz07
i got my car dynoed and i thought that was low for my mods (below) found out later on that my car is running really rich 10:1 a/f ive had it tuned a bit but nothing major and it goes heaps better. i also just bought a FMIC and its going on soon and with a dyno im hoping to get aleast 250rwhp
i got my car dynoed and i thought that was low for my mods (below) found out later on that my car is running really rich 10:1 a/f ive had it tuned a bit but nothing major and it goes heaps better. i also just bought a FMIC and its going on soon and with a dyno im hoping to get aleast 250rwhp
Thanks,
Boris
EDIT: oops, I just noticed that you were running rich, so partly-ignore the "hot air" comment )
Last edited by ///3oris; 03-13-03 at 04:50 PM.
#90
Originally posted by importboi22
fuel calculator!
fuel calculator!
LMK...
Boris
#92
B O R I C U A
iTrader: (14)
Originally posted by RETed
In reality, it kills gas mileage - if not retuned, it'll cause a 15 city/25 hwy FC to produce 12 city / 18 hwy mileage, which is horrendous for most people...
-Ted
In reality, it kills gas mileage - if not retuned, it'll cause a 15 city/25 hwy FC to produce 12 city / 18 hwy mileage, which is horrendous for most people...
-Ted
A pump and a aftermarket FPR to regulate pressure back to normal?
#95
Originally posted by Kahren
if your car is tuned properly and u keep the same driving habbit your gas milages SHOULD NOT decreese
if your car is tuned properly and u keep the same driving habbit your gas milages SHOULD NOT decreese
#96
**-P I drive a miata.
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: albany, GA
Posts: 1,600
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm getting 12mpg on highway estimate... I have the #'s but have not done the calculations.
I think I have the bad gas mileage record for non-ported cars
I got about 180 miles on my last tank.
and the wierd thing is... there are no funky smells coming from exhaust except for normal, no bleeding sore eyes, no smell from the engine compartment, etc etc... though it does backfire a good bit and it bumps coming off the idle.
I think I have the bad gas mileage record for non-ported cars
I got about 180 miles on my last tank.
and the wierd thing is... there are no funky smells coming from exhaust except for normal, no bleeding sore eyes, no smell from the engine compartment, etc etc... though it does backfire a good bit and it bumps coming off the idle.
#97
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i just had one more question, i am getting the fmic soon and i was wondering if i should expect to gian boost or would it drop from the piping beening bigger? i heard both and i am kinda scared that it might boost alot from it...
#98
a front mount is not going to increase your boost. However with the front mount it will be safer to run more boost as the chance for overheating the air and in return causing detonation is much lower. The stock top mount is in a pretty crappy location to begin with and over 11-12 pounds of boost it becomes really ineffective. If you have really hot air being thrown into the engine this makes detonation that much easier. You might notice a little more lag, but then some people say that a front mount had little effect on lag at all.
#99
Originally posted by Kahren
gsracer u are either realyl leaning out and realyl pushing it, or the boost gauge is not accurate, the walboro doesnt seem to do much even IF there is a higer pressure at that rpm in teh fuel rail HOW much is it realyl higher? i dont think it makes the injectors any bigger or maybe by a small margin. i woudl get it dynoed. this is why most peopel blow up puttign mods on and never bothering to check the AFRs.
gsracer u are either realyl leaning out and realyl pushing it, or the boost gauge is not accurate, the walboro doesnt seem to do much even IF there is a higer pressure at that rpm in teh fuel rail HOW much is it realyl higher? i dont think it makes the injectors any bigger or maybe by a small margin. i woudl get it dynoed. this is why most peopel blow up puttign mods on and never bothering to check the AFRs.
I'm in the mid 11's for a/f ratio at 10-11 pounds.
232 rwhp.
Still just the walbro.