2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

Clarification on removing BAC and AWS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 9, 2007 | 09:54 PM
  #1  
BklynRX7's Avatar
Thread Starter
King of the Loop
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,620
Likes: 1
From: brooklyn, New York
Arrow Clarification on removing BAC and AWS

Ok guys I want to remove my BAC and AWS sunday and I just want to make sure im doing this correctly before I get started.

As far as the BAC goes the only thing that worries me is the coolant line that runs through it. I was just going to remove the valve, block off the location on the engine and relink the 2 coolant lines with a piece of similar sized pipe. Does anyone here know the diameter of these hoses? If not Ill check tomorrow night.

For the AWS I just see the 2 lines, one runs to the UIM and the other under the dynamic chamber and into the intake. A search told me just to remove the solenoid, plug the hole in the uim, and pull out the other hose.

Am i missing anything?
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2007 | 09:56 PM
  #2  
wthdidusay82's Avatar
Rotary Power
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,706
Likes: 4
From: Dinwiddie, Va
Originally Posted by BklynRX7
Ok guys I want to remove my BAC and AWS sunday and I just want to make sure im doing this correctly before I get started.

As far as the BAC goes the only thing that worries me is the coolant line that runs through it. I was just going to remove the valve, block off the location on the engine and relink the 2 coolant lines with a piece of similar sized pipe. Does anyone here know the diameter of these hoses? If not Ill check tomorrow night.

For the AWS I just see the 2 lines, one runs to the UIM and the other under the dynamic chamber and into the intake. A search told me just to remove the solenoid, plug the hole in the uim, and pull out the other hose.

Am i missing anything?
You should get blockoff plates for the cold start and bac.

They are sold here

http://www.2751engineering.com/2751parts.html
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2007 | 10:14 PM
  #3  
BklynRX7's Avatar
Thread Starter
King of the Loop
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,620
Likes: 1
From: brooklyn, New York
Arrow

I have the block off plate for the BAC, the aws doesnt need one, and s5's didnt have a cold start setup, mazda recalled it.
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2007 | 10:21 PM
  #4  
t-too's Avatar
Fast when it works
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
From: Missoula MT usa
I've been playing with my BAC little bit... I blocked it off with a piece of gasket material(left the middle intact) and i couldnt get my car to run... It runs when I leave it unplugged, but when i block it off it doesnt work at all. I'm assuming you'd have to adjust the throttle body to get it to work right?
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2007 | 10:31 PM
  #5  
BklynRX7's Avatar
Thread Starter
King of the Loop
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,620
Likes: 1
From: brooklyn, New York
Arrow

Originally Posted by t-too
I've been playing with my BAC little bit... I blocked it off with a piece of gasket material(left the middle intact) and i couldnt get my car to run... It runs when I leave it unplugged, but when i block it off it doesnt work at all. I'm assuming you'd have to adjust the throttle body to get it to work right?
Well i installed an intake that does not have holes to attach the aws and bac, they are open in the engine bay with breather filters on, the car wont idle on the first try but can hold a stumbling idle after it starts. Im hoping blocking them off so no more air is taken in will solve this. I adjusted the tb to get it to idle in the first place.
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2007 | 11:30 PM
  #6  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
You're sucking in unmetered air and making the idle mixture too lean. Add a connection to the intake pipe like it's supposed to have.
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2007 | 05:33 PM
  #7  
BklynRX7's Avatar
Thread Starter
King of the Loop
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,620
Likes: 1
From: brooklyn, New York
Arrow

Originally Posted by NZConvertible
You're sucking in unmetered air and making the idle mixture too lean. Add a connection to the intake pipe like it's supposed to have.
I know whats happening thats why Im blocking it off. I want to see if I can live wiht removing the systems before I resort to figuring out a way to make them work again.

Last edited by BklynRX7; Mar 10, 2007 at 05:40 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2007 | 06:58 PM
  #8  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
So veave them both where they are and disconnect the electrical plugs to disable them. They'll stay closed and you'll know what it's like to live without them.

Personally I'd ditch the AWS (pointless without cats) and leave the BAC valve. I like idle speed control.
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2007 | 07:28 PM
  #9  
Sideways7's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,598
Likes: 10
From: Temple, Texas (Central)
I personally don't even see the point in removing the BAC on an NA car. It won't add any power and it can hurt drivability. I agree with NZconvertable, idle speed control is a good thing.
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2007 | 07:57 PM
  #10  
HAILERS's Avatar
HAILERS
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 20,563
Likes: 27
From: FORT WORTH, TEXAS,USA
****, the aws doesnt need one, and s5's didnt have a cold start setup, mazda recalled it.
************************************************** ***********************
You mispoke there. Only the SUBZERO ASSIST was removed. They had enough sense to keep the fast idle cam, water thermowax, cam roller etc.

I've no idea what cold start setup is other than the above list of parts.
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2007 | 04:05 AM
  #11  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
It's in the S5 FSM...
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2007 | 12:08 PM
  #12  
BklynRX7's Avatar
Thread Starter
King of the Loop
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,620
Likes: 1
From: brooklyn, New York
Arrow

Originally Posted by HAILERS
****, the aws doesnt need one, and s5's didnt have a cold start setup, mazda recalled it.
************************************************** ***********************
You mispoke there. Only the SUBZERO ASSIST was removed. They had enough sense to keep the fast idle cam, water thermowax, cam roller etc.

I've no idea what cold start setup is other than the above list of parts.

Originally Posted by NZConvertible
It's in the S5 FSM...

yes, I mixed the 2 up. I realized the difference now.
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2007 | 02:49 PM
  #13  
dreadseb's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
From: Near Calgary
What are the pros and cons of removing the BAC valve, I've been thinking about removing it but just haven't convinced myself to go through with it yet.
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2007 | 04:00 PM
  #14  
Aaron Cake's Avatar
Engine, Not Motor
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 29,798
Likes: 128
From: London, Ontario, Canada
Pros: None. Well, I guess removal could make the engine bay look slightly "cleaner".

Cons: ECU can no longer control idle. Thus, any load on the engine (electrical or mechanical) will cause a drop in RPM. Causes annoyances like the car stalling when you turn on the headlights/defrost/AC, makes the car easier to stall if you drag the RPM too far down during decel, etc.
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2007 | 04:05 PM
  #15  
dreadseb's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
From: Near Calgary
If there are no pros to this then why has it been done on more than a handfull of occasions?
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2007 | 05:13 PM
  #16  
Omixeo's Avatar
'89 GTUs
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 953
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, Arizona
Because people are retarded.
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2007 | 05:47 PM
  #17  
Aaron Cake's Avatar
Engine, Not Motor
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 29,798
Likes: 128
From: London, Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted by dreadseb
If there are no pros to this then why has it been done on more than a handfull of occasions?
People are stupid?

There are a number of reason really...

On a pure track car, there's no reason for the BAC, so that's a valid option.

Sometimes people don't run them with standalones because it's not always necessary as you can more finely tune the idle with varying loads.

Some people think it makes the car more reliable to remove "unnecessary parts". When you think about it, when is the last time that a BAC failure stopped someone from driving their car? To me, a car that needs to idle at 1000+ RPM, may stall when the headlights/e-fan/AC/etc. is turned on is the definition of unreliable.

Some people think they will get more power. No idea how that one started.

But by far, most people don't understand what they are doing and are just imitating others without putting any thought into it.
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2007 | 05:55 PM
  #18  
88rxn/a's Avatar
tom port.. AKA streetport
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,658
Likes: 0
From: ludlow, pa
i dont get it?
i said somthing similar about people being ignorant and i get a warning for it?
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2007 | 07:30 PM
  #19  
BklynRX7's Avatar
Thread Starter
King of the Loop
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,620
Likes: 1
From: brooklyn, New York
Arrow

As of right now the aws is gone and the BAC is unplugged. The car idles at around 850 with the lights and fogs on and doesnt drop below 500 when decelerating hard. I dont have any other accessories.

When I start it after sitting several hours i have to tap the gas one time to keep from shutting off but its smooth sailing from then on. Ill probably totally remove the BAC next sunday. Once I removed the AWS the check engine light came on, ill find a way around this.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2007 | 02:43 AM
  #20  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
Try it with the headlights, foglights, brake lights, wipers, rear defroster and stereo on, simulating sitting at an intersection on a rainy winter day with foggy windows. Add A/C to that and you'll know why I'll never remove my BAC valve.

To get rid of the CEL and error code, measure the resistance of the solenoid's coil, and put a resistor of similar value across the connector pins.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jeff20B
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
73
Sep 16, 2018 07:16 PM
Steelwheelz
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
6
Sep 15, 2015 03:22 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:36 AM.