2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

Catalytic Converter Question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-13-14, 10:07 AM
  #26  
Engine, Not Motor

iTrader: (1)
 
Aaron Cake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 29,789
Likes: 0
Received 108 Likes on 91 Posts
Originally Posted by j9fd3s
the problem with the pre-MSP rotaries, is that they cannot be run at 14.7:1 at low rpm without misfire. a misfire = higher unburned HC's than running a little rich.
Ah, but you can get them close. I tuned a stock port 13B on an MS3X with sequential injection that last year that would idle all day long at around 14:0 once the optimum injector timing was figured out. That's probably close enough not to be too much of a detriment to cat life.
Old 10-13-14, 12:37 PM
  #27  
Moderator

iTrader: (3)
 
j9fd3s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Posts: 30,796
Received 2,574 Likes on 1,830 Posts
Originally Posted by Aaron Cake
Ah, but you can get them close. I tuned a stock port 13B on an MS3X with sequential injection that last year that would idle all day long at around 14:0 once the optimum injector timing was figured out. That's probably close enough not to be too much of a detriment to cat life.
true. its been my experience that the cats actually work better a little rich, ie the emissions numbers are lower when its just a tad rich vs a tad lean.
Old 10-13-14, 07:30 PM
  #28  
talking head

 
bumpstart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Perth, WA, OZ
Posts: 2,775
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
i have extend port and idle all day at 15.4 :1.. ( lambda 1 for LPG )
and cruise around at 0.95 or better lambda

it is all in how well it stays atomised .. dry gas fuels do not re-condense

would suggest in the petrol rotary it is mostly about getting the angle of injection timing right for you injector positions and airflows


luckily,, i also have a december 85 FC.... and as such it scopes below the law as for the absolute cut off date for manufacture requiring a cat.. which is in oz,, 1st of feb 86
( in those states stipulating build and not compliance dating )

but if i did , i would be fairly confident my lambda feedback system and tune is pretty close to what the cat desires
my biggest worry is having seen 1000 c under load on my EGT , and this would suggest i need to push mine further back

and if doing a test ( im240 or 5 gas ) it would pay to have pre-warmed the engine

btw,, in 2005 during testing with LPG
mine passed the equivalent 5 gas test as would have been expected from a euro 2 standard
- well beyond what a new FC is expected to do
Old 10-13-14, 09:55 PM
  #29  
Moderator

iTrader: (3)
 
j9fd3s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Posts: 30,796
Received 2,574 Likes on 1,830 Posts
in California we rate the emissions differently, and we're also given a visual check, as we are mandated to use OEM or specially approved parts only.

in an IM240 county (they are not all), we need to be under .6% CO, about 90 HC's, in parts per million, and about 450 nox's.

somehow these are not absolute numbers, as it varies by weight and something.

our system is basically a lesson in how not to govern. we have a 5 member panel that is only concerned with cleaning the air, and they will poison the water to do it....
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
_Tones_
Adaptronic Engine Mgmt - AUS
10
05-25-21 05:37 AM
Nosferatu
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
7
09-05-15 02:13 PM



Quick Reply: Catalytic Converter Question



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:27 AM.