Bridge Porting Question - n/a 6 port
#27
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Alabama just east of B'ham
Posts: 445
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
He never got his version of a bridge ported 6-port to run good. It doesn't mean it can't be done, just that he couldn't do it on that particular engine.
#28
**-P I drive a miata.
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: albany, GA
Posts: 1,600
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yes. I remember talking to him about this. It was because of:
stock ecu
needed separate runners from the secondaries AND needed unequal lengths.
port timing was not right
His power was not cutting on till... 8k I think?
He mentioned that if you bridged both the secondaries and the aux's with a bridge that you could have them on the same runner because the port timing would be the same(??? I think?) and it would not kill the inertial supercharging effect.
this is not stuff that I <--- came up with but was told and read up on and tried to understand later.
stock ecu
needed separate runners from the secondaries AND needed unequal lengths.
port timing was not right
His power was not cutting on till... 8k I think?
He mentioned that if you bridged both the secondaries and the aux's with a bridge that you could have them on the same runner because the port timing would be the same(??? I think?) and it would not kill the inertial supercharging effect.
this is not stuff that I <--- came up with but was told and read up on and tried to understand later.
#29
Engine, Not Motor
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 29,789
Likes: 0
Received 108 Likes
on
91 Posts
I am in the process of doing this right now. Of course, while my engine is not an NA, it still is a 6 port. I'm starting with the Mazdatrix 6 port street port template and modifying from there for bridge over the secondaries (and primaries if I have space). Exhaust is ported with a Racing Beat "race" 13B exhaust template. It's nowhere near done yet, so I can't say how well it works...
#30
I'm a boost creep...
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
I can't see the point of only bridgeporting the auxiliary ports. A bridgeport is simply a bigger port, it's nothing magical. Since the auxiliary ports only contribute about a quarter of the engine's total flow, the overall improvement is not going to be much considering the amount of work involved.
IMO, bridgeporting both secondary and auxiliary ports would be a minimum.
IMO, bridgeporting both secondary and auxiliary ports would be a minimum.
#31
RIP Icemark
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Aloha OR
Posts: 1,481
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
But NZ, I think that a lot of ppl want just the Aux ports for drivability, and being able to pass smog. But I am trying to figure out a way to make some actuators out of butterfly throttle stops for both the aux and secondary ports. I am just not sure if the engine will run enough for smog on just the primary ports.
#33
OBEY YOUR MAZDA
Concerned about activation of the sleeves when going emissionless, and flow of the aux. ports then go euro.spec endplates
European spec. irons has no sleeves and better port flow
LIM with butterfly valves
IMO(might be wrong) going bridge on a N/A is all about the brap-brap-brap, TWM throttlebodys and microtech or the like, will probably get you the same amount of power and better streetability
European spec. irons has no sleeves and better port flow
LIM with butterfly valves
IMO(might be wrong) going bridge on a N/A is all about the brap-brap-brap, TWM throttlebodys and microtech or the like, will probably get you the same amount of power and better streetability
Last edited by Kim; 01-31-04 at 10:57 PM.
#34
RIP Icemark
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Aloha OR
Posts: 1,481
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Kim that is exactly what I was planning, only with a IDA manifold. I am going to macine a spacer to go between the manifold and the block that will hold some butterflys for the aux ports, maybe even the secondarys, I just need to figure out if the engine will run at all on just the primary ports.
#38
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Aurora, IL and Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 376
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by hpram99
I've seen a few posts for them in the buy/sell section.
They get around.
p.s. just a hint, not everyone lives in north america.
I've seen a few posts for them in the buy/sell section.
They get around.
p.s. just a hint, not everyone lives in north america.
...really . Trying to find one stateside so that you dont have to pay an arm and leg for shipping would be nice.
#40
I'm a boost creep...
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Originally posted by hpram99
I forgot about the euro-style LIM. That would definately solve the problem with the aux. port opening.
I forgot about the euro-style LIM. That would definately solve the problem with the aux. port opening.
If they were that good, they wouldn't have been confined to a relatively small market, and probably would've appeared on the RX-8.
#41
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Alabama just east of B'ham
Posts: 445
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just make your own euro spec end plates. I used devcon on my Alabama spec plates. But then again I'm not using a euro spec lower intake manifold either. I've removed all the actuator stuff and cleaned the air flow up thru the lower intake. More devcon was needed for that also.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Skeese
Adaptronic Engine Mgmt - AUS
65
03-28-17 03:30 PM
bridgeport, bridgeporting, euro, geriatrics, golf, lim, mazdatrix, na, play, port, rx7, spec, template, watching