2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

Anyone got pictures of the RENESIS yet?

Old Oct 31, 2002 | 09:09 AM
  #76  
KiyoKix's Avatar
Thread Starter
13B N/A POWA!
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,013
Likes: 0
From: Everywhere, WRLD
I just read something that is very depressing (especially to those of the forced induction persuasion)...

"Mazda powertrain managers have ruled out the chance of turbocharging the RX-8 RENESIS rotary engine but admit they are looking at ways of increasing capacity of the 1300cc two-rotor engine, bringing more naturally aspirated power to the lightweight unit. "

This is an article that I read this morning on a link from rotary news.com (http://newsmotoring.news.com.au/news...E21822,00.html), there's the actual link. It has SOME good news, but there's that bad part about not turbocharging the RENESIS. :-(
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2002 | 09:57 AM
  #77  
faster7's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
From: Springfield, Missouri USA
More capacity?

Hmmm. Perhaps more capacity that adds a bit of weight? I'd settle for a 2 piece eccentric shaft, you know.


"Mazda powertrain managers have ruled out the chance of turbocharging the RX-8 RENESIS rotary engine but admit they are looking at ways of increasing capacity of the 1300cc two-rotor engine, bringing more naturally aspirated power to the lightweight unit. "
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2002 | 11:07 AM
  #78  
KiyoKix's Avatar
Thread Starter
13B N/A POWA!
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,013
Likes: 0
From: Everywhere, WRLD
I would actually really like to see Mazda or someone start work on the 21A/22A engines again. They were mamouth sized engines (1054cc per chamber...2108cc all together!!!), it would be REALLY interesting to see how much power they could get out of one of those (w/out forced induction...maybe later). I like seeing how much "honest power" you can get out of a motor (and still keep it reliable) before you go the forced induction route to get some more power. I can only imagine what power they would make with an engine that size. I'm actually more excited about that engine than I am about the 3,4, and 6 rotor engines! Call me crazy, but I swear if I had to machining tools and materials I would love to try and tackle something like that.
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2002 | 11:29 AM
  #79  
vaughnc's Avatar
knowledge junkie
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,595
Likes: 6
From: Atlanta, GA
2 engine power levels in the rx-8?? They must mean auto vs stickshift.

Um, like I said before MAZDA NEEDS A 3 rotor NA in the next rx-7. They're going NA for ultra reliability & increased engine life.

Tune that 3 rotor for 325hp/275 ft-lbs
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2002 | 02:13 PM
  #80  
KiyoKix's Avatar
Thread Starter
13B N/A POWA!
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,013
Likes: 0
From: Everywhere, WRLD
That's also true though...I'd like the see a 3 rotor as something standard in America (they should've brought the Cosmo out here anyway). It's be easier and "more reliable" than tuning a 2 rotor (13B) for something high class.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ray green
1st Gen General Discussion
2
Sep 2, 2015 06:35 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:13 PM.