87_rocket

which do you prefer, 16's or 17's on an 87 N/A base?

unek87

16's i think. they just look good on a lowered fc ,is your lowered?

Espoc19

how about 16's in the front and 17's in the rear.

87_rocket

Mine isnt lowered. And staggered 16's with 17's would look sick, cept it would be more expensive :-\

NOPR

22's!!!!!



but seriously, 17's.

Jager

iTrader: (10)

16's for me. Just lower it.

Turbo23

iTrader: (4)

17 front 18 rear, fills the gaps quite nice, if your going for racing 17's all around

deltr0n`

18's... 17's are too small

Eternal_Gamer

iTrader: (10)

16s but i got a fucked up setup right now. 18 rear 16 front, it came like that.

SpiffyD

17s looks nice slammed fills in the gap great 18s are nice also but 17s i guess are just right for me lol

doomtrain

i have 17s on my fc. its also lowered but to tell u the truth its going to raise your ride hight like an inch or more. i rather go with 16s.

88IntegraLS

Just putting on my 16's with 245 rear tires raised my ride height over my old 15's with 60 series tires, but the larger rims do fill out the fenders nicely and grip more in turns.

For NA I'd go with 16's, just because rotational inertia increases with the square of the radius, and rotational inertia is part of what slows the car down, not simply wheel weight. But 17's are usually heavier than 16's anyhow. For pure NA straight line acceleration, the stock BBS 15's are the best bet IMO.