**sleepy~eyez**
Ho's and Cadillac Doors
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,703
Likes: 1
From: ATL, GA
Originally posted by jsmiley
and there is a wrong way and a right way to do it, the wrong way is to just do all fuse junk, and the right way is to fab or shorten the bracket, or to get a controller....
and there is a wrong way and a right way to do it, the wrong way is to just do all fuse junk, and the right way is to fab or shorten the bracket, or to get a controller....
Actually, there is no right or wrong way to do it, because it was never meant to be done. Its pointless in fact.
Ho's and Cadillac Doors
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,703
Likes: 1
From: ATL, GA
Originally posted by gnome311
I think it looks good, and at high speeds it should reduce the drag a little bit.
I think it looks good, and at high speeds it should reduce the drag a little bit.
1. No one here is gonna be travelling at speeds high enough for that to even matter
2. Having your headlights in the closed position is the ultimate reduced drag position
3. Having your lights sleepy eyed at night in order to reduce drag at high speeds is flat out retarded. No one should be driving that fast at night, especially with half of the outward visibility they normally would have if their headlights weren't in *** mode.
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
From: Zeeland/Holland ,Michigan
Originally posted by 2ndGen.rocket
No one should be driving that fast at night, especially with half of the outward visibility they normally would have if their headlights weren't in *** mode.
No one should be driving that fast at night, especially with half of the outward visibility they normally would have if their headlights weren't in *** mode.
