1st Generation Specific (1979-1985) 1979-1985 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections

Why did mazda retard timing at idle on carb'd 12A?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 1, 2007 | 04:10 PM
  #51  
Jeff20B's Avatar
Lapping = Fapping
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 15,725
Likes: 91
From: Near Seattle
I need to worry about this stuff too. What was the final verdict on the rat's nest made easy for PCV valve function? I don't have a purge valve or a PCV valve for this '84 12A I'm working on.

Rather than hijack this thread I'll describe it in detail in a new thread with pics and interesting info. Maybe others will learn something from my efforts.
Old Apr 2, 2007 | 12:45 PM
  #52  
purple82's Avatar
Absolute Power is Awesome
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,973
Likes: 5
From: Issaquah, WA
Originally Posted by Gen1onr
Oh man, now im confused.

Im about to go out and set the timing on my car, so I read over this:
http://www.yawpower.com/pultime.html

Which says that the vacuum advance works off manifold vacuum, and advances the timing at idle.

Is there a straight answer for this???
That's right., vacuum advance works at high vacuum to compensate for mixture variations at low loads.

The workshop manual is the best place to find out where to plug the vacuum line and how to do the timing. Yaw's description works too, though.
Old Apr 3, 2007 | 12:05 PM
  #53  
Kentetsu's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 11,359
Likes: 14
From: Grand Rapids Michigan
We really need to come up with a definitive answer to this question...
Old Apr 3, 2007 | 12:57 PM
  #54  
Jeff20B's Avatar
Lapping = Fapping
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 15,725
Likes: 91
From: Near Seattle
I hooked up the vacuum tubes like the second version of the pic with the red line, and it runs fine. So in my opinion, use the updated version.
Old Apr 6, 2007 | 03:54 PM
  #55  
Rogue_Wulff's Avatar
Too old to act my age
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,164
Likes: 0
From: Tulsa, Ok.
Originally Posted by Gen1onr
Oh man, now im confused.

Im about to go out and set the timing on my car, so I read over this:
http://www.yawpower.com/pultime.html

Which says that the vacuum advance works off manifold vacuum, and advances the timing at idle.

Is there a straight answer for this???
I e-mailed them about this obvious blunder, and never got a response from them. That was over a year ago.
I've been offline for a couple weeks due to a move in my residence, sorry for the delay in adding the correct $.02.....
Old Apr 6, 2007 | 06:13 PM
  #56  
purple82's Avatar
Absolute Power is Awesome
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,973
Likes: 5
From: Issaquah, WA
My thesis for my masters ME graduate degree was in engine airflow. I've had alot of experience in engine operation.

Any reference source you look at will tell you the same thing that I'm saying.
Old Apr 6, 2007 | 08:28 PM
  #57  
trochoid's Avatar
Old Fart Young at Heart
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 15,145
Likes: 8
From: St Joe MO
Haha guys, I learned a while ago not to argue with Purple82.
Old Apr 6, 2007 | 09:15 PM
  #58  
Stevan's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,041
Likes: 1
From: Jax, FL.
I think your car will run ok either of the 2 ways you connect it.
The rat nest made easy drawing is drawn from Carl and Pratch's tutorial.
If you look on page 254 of the Haynes manual, you will see the source of both leading and trailing vacuum is above the throttle plates.
Old Apr 7, 2007 | 12:23 AM
  #59  
Rogue_Wulff's Avatar
Too old to act my age
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,164
Likes: 0
From: Tulsa, Ok.
Originally Posted by trochoid
Haha guys, I learned a while ago not to argue with Purple82.
Engineers and teenagers. Can't tell 'em a dern thing, cause they know everything.......
Old Apr 7, 2007 | 12:56 AM
  #60  
purple82's Avatar
Absolute Power is Awesome
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,973
Likes: 5
From: Issaquah, WA
Originally Posted by Rogue_Wulff
Engineers and teenagers. Can't tell 'em a dern thing, cause they know everything.......
The folks who I listened to to learn what I know are the people who designed the things in the first place. Then I became one of those people. Engineers listen, they just know who the right people are to listen to.
Old Apr 7, 2007 | 08:16 AM
  #61  
REVHED's Avatar
Hunting Skylines
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,431
Likes: 4
From: Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Originally Posted by Rogue_Wulff
That proves my point. If you hook the vac advance to manifold vac, it becomes a vacuum retard. Manifold vacuum drops as you open the throttle. Venturi vacuum increases, as the airflow thru the venturi's increases, hence the name.
Those diagrams show the total advance of the mechanical and vacuum advance individually, but they are combined to achieve the total advance.
Mechanical is 12.5* on both Leading and trailing, while the vacuum is 4.5* L, and 15* T. Total advance becomes 17* L (12.5 + 4.5) & 27.5* T (12.5 + 15) (12A figures quoted, as that is what the title of the thread is dealing with).
Anyone who say vacuum advance should be hooked to a manifold vacuum source, is wrong. I don't care who they are, or how many books they may have written.
Did you not read the friggin diagram?

As manifold vacuum increases the amount of advance increases. It's really not that hard to follow.

Vacuum advance is there to provide more timing during light load/low throttle situations. Purple82 is absolutely correct.
Old Apr 7, 2007 | 10:42 AM
  #62  
dbragg's Avatar
Say hello to Mr.Wankel
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 5,962
Likes: 1
From: Cartersville, Ga
so which nipple is the correct nipple? the one from the original thread(2nd from the left) or the one farther to the right?
Old Apr 7, 2007 | 03:51 PM
  #63  
mar3's Avatar
Administrator
Tenured Member: 25 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 12,974
Likes: 62
From: So. Arlington, TX!!!
I'd say 24 - 26 mpg on a carb'd streetport 12A has probably got it on the correct nipple....for all the folks going with the red diagram, what's the mpg been for y'all? Maybe that isn't the answer after all, despite the smooth idle. Results are more important than belief this time around.

And if we're going to start yakkin' about degrees and letters, post PROOF by posting a pic of your degree...surely that isn't too daunting a task for an ME or even a PhD kind guy...,...too much 'Net BS sometimes about accomplishments w/o really proving anything goes on everywhere these days, speakin' of BS...BS in Science here...Pre-Med degree pursued in folly...

Old Apr 7, 2007 | 04:03 PM
  #64  
brandonick2000's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
From: Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio
so i am new here but i know something about this but i have some questions first i dont have the time right now to read through five pages of posts but has anyone checked the vaccum routing diagrams in a factory service maual
Old Apr 8, 2007 | 11:44 AM
  #65  
Jeff20B's Avatar
Lapping = Fapping
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 15,725
Likes: 91
From: Near Seattle
The '84 with the automatic was hooked up with the red diagram. It requires a good smooth idle. It runs well enough, even at high RPM, so I'm going to leave it.
Old Apr 8, 2007 | 11:57 PM
  #66  
Rogue_Wulff's Avatar
Too old to act my age
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,164
Likes: 0
From: Tulsa, Ok.
Originally Posted by REVHED
Did you not read the friggin diagram?

As manifold vacuum increases the amount of advance increases. It's really not that hard to follow.

Vacuum advance is there to provide more timing during light load/low throttle situations. Purple82 is absolutely incorrect.
Fix't.
Old Apr 9, 2007 | 12:50 AM
  #67  
Intense_7's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
From: urf
http://members.iinet.net.au/~awcabren/DSC00114.JPG
http://members.iinet.net.au/~awcabren/DSC00113.JPG

I've got mine hooked up to the far left nipple and the far right nipple, should i move the far left one to the second far right one?
Old Apr 9, 2007 | 08:32 AM
  #68  
purple82's Avatar
Absolute Power is Awesome
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,973
Likes: 5
From: Issaquah, WA
Originally Posted by Rogue_Wulff
Engineers and teenagers. Can't tell 'em a dern thing, cause they know everything.......
LOL, who's the stubborn one? Admit when you're wrong and move on.

By the way, I'm not saying that you've got it plugged into the wrong port. I'm just saying you don't have the right reason for plugging it into that port.

Again folks, use the workshop manual for the correct location.
Old Apr 9, 2007 | 11:33 AM
  #69  
Rogue_Wulff's Avatar
Too old to act my age
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,164
Likes: 0
From: Tulsa, Ok.
Originally Posted by purple82
LOL, who's the stubborn one? Admit when you're wrong and move on.

By the way, I'm not saying that you've got it plugged into the wrong port. I'm just saying you don't have the right reason for plugging it into that port.

Again folks, use the workshop manual for the correct location.
But I ain't wrong. Using the workshop manual to find the right port is excellent advice, as it backs up what I have been trying to tell you. Even the vacuum diagram under the hood shows where the vac line should be hooked up.
Manifold vacuum drops as the throttle is opened, while venturi vacuum increases as it's opened. Don't take my word on it, though. Use a vacuum guage and test it for yourself.
I don't come on here trying to prove I'm right by backing up what I say with degrees and other stuff that says I be edumacated, instead I stated what every old-school hot rodder has known for years.

The vac advance increases timing under lower RPM's and engine loads by using venturi vacuum, because under those conditions, manifold vacuum is actually decreasing. Why do you think the brake booster has a check valve in it?
Old Apr 9, 2007 | 03:13 PM
  #70  
purple82's Avatar
Absolute Power is Awesome
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,973
Likes: 5
From: Issaquah, WA
Originally Posted by Rogue_Wulff
But I ain't wrong. Using the workshop manual to find the right port is excellent advice, as it backs up what I have been trying to tell you. Even the vacuum diagram under the hood shows where the vac line should be hooked up.
Manifold vacuum drops as the throttle is opened, while venturi vacuum increases as it's opened. Don't take my word on it, though. Use a vacuum guage and test it for yourself.
I don't come on here trying to prove I'm right by backing up what I say with degrees and other stuff that says I be edumacated, instead I stated what every old-school hot rodder has known for years.

The vac advance increases timing under lower RPM's and engine loads by using venturi vacuum, because under those conditions, manifold vacuum is actually decreasing. Why do you think the brake booster has a check valve in it?
I'm not proving I'm right by telling you I'm an engineer. I'm telling you I'm an engineer to give what I say credibility. I'm proving I'm right by backing up what I know with sources. There are 3 sources in this thread alone besides myself that contradict what you are saying, including Paul Yaw. Are they all wrong? I'd challenge you to find a writeup that backs up your theory, but I know you can't.
Old Apr 9, 2007 | 04:11 PM
  #71  
Rogue_Wulff's Avatar
Too old to act my age
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,164
Likes: 0
From: Tulsa, Ok.
Engineers have no credibility with me. As for Yaw's write up, I already answered that. Yes, it's wrong, and I told him so. He never bothered to respond.
Hook it however you want, I don't care. I know what the correct method is, and I use it.
I'm done with this rediculous thread. You can make a person go to school, but you can't make them learn.
Old Apr 9, 2007 | 04:30 PM
  #72  
Kentetsu's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 11,359
Likes: 14
From: Grand Rapids Michigan
Simple; I typed "vacuum advance" into google, and this is what it spat out (top link) http://www.leeric.lsu.edu/bgbb/7/ecep/auto/h/h.htm

In this article, it states that vacuum for the advance mechanism is taken from above the throttle plates so that vacuum increases with throttle opening. This is exactly how I always understood it to be.

Purple82, I believe you are operating under a misconception here...
Old Apr 10, 2007 | 01:42 AM
  #73  
REVHED's Avatar
Hunting Skylines
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,431
Likes: 4
From: Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Originally Posted by Kentetsu
Simple; I typed "vacuum advance" into google, and this is what it spat out (top link) http://www.leeric.lsu.edu/bgbb/7/ecep/auto/h/h.htm

In this article, it states that vacuum for the advance mechanism is taken from above the throttle plates so that vacuum increases with throttle opening. This is exactly how I always understood it to be.

Purple82, I believe you are operating under a misconception here...
I believe you are the one who is under a misconception. Read the WHOLE article. The vacuum is taken from just above the throttle plates so there is no vacuum at idle. But, as soon as you crack the throttle it uncovers the port which is then exposed to manifold vacuum! Having the port way above the throttle would be redundant as it would advance at virtually the same rate as the centrifugal advance.

The part I've underlined explains this clear as day. Vacuum advance is for low engine speed/load. The only reason it's above the throttle is to prevent advance at idle in some cases. I hope this puts an end to this nonsense.

Only when a strong enough vacuum signal is present will it advance the ignition timing. The higher the vacuum signal, the greater the timing advance. High vacuum signals are indicative of low engine loads at a closed or nearly closed throttle position. At idle, when the throttle is almost completely closed, vacuum is highest; however, during idle, no vacuum signal is present at the vacuum advance. This is accomplished by tapping the vacuum for the advance system above the throttle plate.
Old Apr 10, 2007 | 04:21 AM
  #74  
Kentetsu's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 11,359
Likes: 14
From: Grand Rapids Michigan
But you're saying the same thing I am! No advance at idle, only at low rpms when you put a load on it (open the throttle plates). The two sentences after the part you underlined explains how this works.
Old Apr 10, 2007 | 08:03 AM
  #75  
djjjr42's Avatar
Registered Offender
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 689
Likes: 0
From: Bishopville, SC
Originally Posted by REVHED
I believe you are the one who is under a misconception. Read the WHOLE article. The vacuum is taken from just above the throttle plates so there is no vacuum at idle. But, as soon as you crack the throttle it uncovers the port which is then exposed to manifold vacuum! Having the port way above the throttle would be redundant as it would advance at virtually the same rate as the centrifugal advance.

The part I've underlined explains this clear as day. Vacuum advance is for low engine speed/load. The only reason it's above the throttle is to prevent advance at idle in some cases. I hope this puts an end to this nonsense.
The only nonsense I hope to see put to an end is a$$holish remarks and interactions with others like this from kids with no human relations skills. See sig.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:54 AM.