Is this too expensive ?
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Bellingham, WA
Posts: 382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In short-- Yes.
13,500 dollars for a 20 year old car is VERY expensive. Yes, that is a LOT of work... i am not disregarding how much work and time has been put into that car not to mention its emaculate condition... but you are talking about a swap that would cost you roughly three thousand dollars (not including labor) and very little modifications to teh interior... Also notice that it says 6,000km travelled... AFTER the turbo swap. So don't let that 6,000 km fool you.
Zachstylez
13,500 dollars for a 20 year old car is VERY expensive. Yes, that is a LOT of work... i am not disregarding how much work and time has been put into that car not to mention its emaculate condition... but you are talking about a swap that would cost you roughly three thousand dollars (not including labor) and very little modifications to teh interior... Also notice that it says 6,000km travelled... AFTER the turbo swap. So don't let that 6,000 km fool you.
Zachstylez
#4
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yah thats what i was thinking, way to much for the car... there are FD here in Aus still going for $29k au or $21k US which is pretty exy.... nice car tho thats for sure, and near me as well
#5
Beware Of Squirrely Wrath
Join Date: May 2002
Location: SW Washington
Posts: 713
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Things I noticed:
1. 1985 is not SA22C.
2. The Heat/AC logicon and center console look suspiciously more like a pre 1984 than a 1985.
3. Who would drop that much money into a rotary, and then list it as a 2 cylinder?
4. Is it actually 160HP or 160KW? Because 160KW is 214.4HP and sounds a lot more appealing for the money.
5. DAMN, that's a sweet looking car!
Just some observations,
Brian
1. 1985 is not SA22C.
2. The Heat/AC logicon and center console look suspiciously more like a pre 1984 than a 1985.
3. Who would drop that much money into a rotary, and then list it as a 2 cylinder?
4. Is it actually 160HP or 160KW? Because 160KW is 214.4HP and sounds a lot more appealing for the money.
5. DAMN, that's a sweet looking car!
Just some observations,
Brian
#6
Newbie
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Victoria B.C. Canada
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well.... it has a turbo and it looks nice but 160 hp to wheels isnt anything special... the 13B is like 138 stock and 6000km to the new engine can be horrible if he drives the **** out of it, and considering it has a turbo... its more than likely, but what do i know... you get get a 2nd gen turbo 2 in good shape for less than that for sure. but if you want to spend like 13k go ahead, they are awsome, i love mine, so much fun...
#7
Looks nice but what's the actual mileage?
No frikkin way would I ever pay close to that. Like it would cost 15-20k to get it to it's current state. Then again, I don't believe in paying for someone else's mods.
I've seen stock FDs go for less.
I guess as a seller mind as well throw the price out there and see who's stupid enough to bite.
F-
No frikkin way would I ever pay close to that. Like it would cost 15-20k to get it to it's current state. Then again, I don't believe in paying for someone else's mods.
I've seen stock FDs go for less.
I guess as a seller mind as well throw the price out there and see who's stupid enough to bite.
F-
Trending Topics
#8
wtb 1g rx7 jdm shiz
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
All 1st gens in Australia were SA22C chassis cars. There never was an FB imported there. They had a 12A, but they came with GSL-SE suspension if I remember correctly. The lack of the US-spec 84-84 interior is standard in Australia as well. The car is worth 15k most likely, just not to anyone who's responded to the thread yet. Is it worth 15k to me? Yep. Would I buy it? Nope, rather do the work myself. As far as FDs go, this car, if it IS actually 160 kilowatts and not 160 horsepower, should almost be able to keep up to a stock FD. It wouldn't take many more mods to make it much faster than an FD (then again, FDs respond quite well to mods as well). These things are going classic soon, so expect prices to gradually creep upwards to where they should be for fine examples, like the car in question (presumably).
Zac
Zac
#9
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I certainly wouldnt be paying that much for it, maybe take off $5-6k then it might be a bit more realistic...160kw wouldnt be all that bad, 160hp is pertty dismal for all the work he has done
Maybe i should email him and go check it out and see how it goes
Maybe i should email him and go check it out and see how it goes
#15
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Pensacola
Posts: 1,068
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
TOO EXPENSIVE!!
u can get a 10k 13bt thats way faster.. goes better and looks better too.
but i guess if i was in that guys positioin i would sell it for that much.. i might need the money
u can get a 10k 13bt thats way faster.. goes better and looks better too.
but i guess if i was in that guys positioin i would sell it for that much.. i might need the money
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jeff20B
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
73
09-16-18 07:16 PM