1st Generation Specific (1979-1985) 1979-1985 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections

Rear Jounce Bumpers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 12, 2008 | 04:49 PM
  #1  
elwood's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,589
Likes: 46
From: Michigan
Rear Jounce Bumpers

I have some ReSpeed adjustable rear springs, and my setup bottoms out on moderate bumps. My jounce bumpers are the original ones, with about half their height removed. When the car bottoms out, there's a fairly hard "thud", and I think this will upset the car when it's on the track. I want to try some of the foam progressive jounce bumpers, but I haven't found any that bolt into position, like the OEM ones. The other option is to put them on my shocks, but I don't know if the shock brackets are strong enough to withstand the forces generated.

Also, my rear spring rate is 175#. I'll consider upping the rate, but I want to try the progressive jounce bumpers first, since I'm happy with the handling balance the way it is.

Suggestions? Ideas?
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2008 | 05:07 PM
  #2  
woodonastick's Avatar
my fb is older than me
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 690
Likes: 0
From: San Jose
what kind of bumps are you hitting? how low is your car? i have stock rear bump stops non cut and havent bottom'd out. (im using 175# eibach with 2 coils cut.) on the track/autoX ive never had any problems cuz those pavements pretty smooth.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2008 | 07:58 PM
  #3  
elwood's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,589
Likes: 46
From: Michigan
The bumps are moderate ones, like the transition from a freshly paved section of road to an older one. As for the height of my car, it's fairly low. The only way to give a meaningful measurement is to go from the axle to the top of the bump stop (as installed), which I can't do this instant. But remember that my setup is different:
1. It's probably much lower than yours, since it was designed as a pure race setup.
2. Your spring rate is now higher than 175#, since you cut some coils.
3. Your spring may be progressive (are the coils closer together at one end?)

It's not a question of whether I need it -- I'm already pretty sure it's the best way to do it. The question is how to get some progressive jounce bumpers in there.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2008 | 08:09 PM
  #4  
woodonastick's Avatar
my fb is older than me
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 690
Likes: 0
From: San Jose
have a pic of the car? that may help.

i have eibach coil springs, not the progressives. the red ones. lol. but yea i have 330# up front and the 175 rear. the coils cut were dead coils.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2008 | 09:07 PM
  #5  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,837
Likes: 3,233
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
the eibach springs have some dead coils, so you can cut em to set ride height and it doesnt affect the rate.

mine are uncut, its probably lower than stock but not much
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2008 | 10:43 AM
  #6  
Kentetsu's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 11,359
Likes: 14
From: Grand Rapids Michigan
I'm running the adjusters, with 150 Lb springs and Bilstein shocks. Can't say that I've ever bottomed out, no matter how hard the bump was. I can't imagine why you'd be bottoming out with the stronger springs. The rear of my car is very low due to the short lenght of the Bilstein shocks.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Th0m4s
Build Threads
25
Feb 26, 2019 02:04 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:47 AM.