1st Generation Specific (1979-1985) 1979-1985 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections

rats nest removal?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 17, 2006 | 07:38 PM
  #1  
Ozmodiar-X's Avatar
Thread Starter
Wants Traction!
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 292
Likes: 0
From: Regina, SK, Canada
rats nest removal?

why would i not want to remov the rats nest if i get better milage and power?
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2006 | 08:28 PM
  #2  
aussiesmg's Avatar
Thunder from downunder
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,843
Likes: 1
From: Convoy, Ohio, USA
Several reasons, less problems, worn out rubber leads to vacuum leaks, simpler, looks cleaner and easier to work on.

Legal issues due to emmissions requirements.

I dont necessarily agree that you get better mileage as you lose several gas savers when they work, ie: shutter valve.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2006 | 10:10 PM
  #3  
Ozmodiar-X's Avatar
Thread Starter
Wants Traction!
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 292
Likes: 0
From: Regina, SK, Canada
so the only thing "Bad" is my emmisions get crappy?
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2006 | 12:20 AM
  #4  
Mazda12AGS's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
From: Columbiana, AL
I removed mine and it seemed to run smoother, but the main thing was it made it 400X easier to work on and it looked alot cleaner.
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2006 | 12:28 AM
  #5  
Ozmodiar-X's Avatar
Thread Starter
Wants Traction!
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 292
Likes: 0
From: Regina, SK, Canada
any more backfire or anything? If emistions dont matter here, would u recomend me doing it?
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2006 | 07:15 AM
  #6  
capt murph's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
From: PA
I would keep it. It is not a race car.
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:30 PM.