1st Generation Specific (1979-1985) 1979-1985 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections

racing rear end gears.. need info from pros

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-26-01, 09:46 PM
  #1  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Dean84SE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lightbulb racing rear end gears.. need info from pros

Hello .. my 84 gslse's ring and pinion teeth were broke off when i was racing last week .. my car has a 4.076 rear end gear stock and i was wandering since i have to buy a new ring and pinion if i should get a 4.078 , 4.444 or a 4.875 rear end ... the 4.875 rear end would be realy high gears and accelerate fast but would it be to much of a acceleration where my top speed will be 80 or some thing.. i autocross and drive my car a couple times a week..
thanks in advance for the advice
Old 10-26-01, 09:56 PM
  #2  
8krpm is not enough

 
speckamp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Since you auto-x, I'd check the rule book to see where changing rear-end gears will put you. If going to a different ratio would put you somewhere where you wouldn't be competative then I'd suggest against it. If, you're already in a class (or ok with going to a class) that allows the swap, then 4.444's might be a good choice. There's a guy in the local area with a MG midgit w/ a half-bridge 13B w/ 4.444 rears, and it really is noticeable off the line. Also, with the stock 4.076 ratio my -SE holds 70MPH @~3200RPM, the 4.444's would move that into the 4000RPM range. Not too much of a loss I don't think.

Just my 2 yen,

matt
Old 10-26-01, 10:12 PM
  #3  
Learn to swim.

 
stinkfist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Mobile,AL
Posts: 1,301
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah the 4.44 is a good compramise. You won't lose to much top end but you will gain low end acceleration. Some people will tell you that the 4.44 is too much. I think it is perfect for the street. A buddy of mine got a 4.11 and wish he would have gotten a 4.44.

Good luck,
Mike
Old 10-26-01, 11:48 PM
  #4  
Hunting Skylines

 
REVHED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Posts: 3,431
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I went from a 3.9 to a 4.44 and the difference in acceleration is very noticeable. IMO 4.44:1 is the best compromise ratio for street driving/track use.
Old 10-28-01, 06:31 PM
  #5  
Rotary Freak

 
Blake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,267
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Rear end gears

Personally, I would go with 4.88 gears. This would give you the best accelleration without going to the weaker 5.13 gears. 4.44 performance is just too moderate for the cost. And, the 4.88 gears only cost $250 through Mazda Comp. Since it's a "competition" part, no Team Support Program membership is required to order them.

If you need to figure out your new gearing as it relates rpm to speed, I have an Excel spreadsheet to calculate all of that (see attachment).
--
Blake Qualley
Rotary Engine Illustrated
Old 10-28-01, 06:34 PM
  #6  
Rotary Freak

 
Blake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,267
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Excel Spreadsheet

Sorry, the attachement didn't go through. I'll try again. If it still doesn't go through, shoot me an email if you want a copy....
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mazdaverx713b
Build Threads
48
04-21-16 06:45 AM



Quick Reply: racing rear end gears.. need info from pros



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:11 AM.