1st Generation Specific (1979-1985) 1979-1985 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections

Low octane fuel better?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-20-05, 04:03 AM
  #1  
Rotary Enthusiast

Thread Starter
 
H4Inf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: The World
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question Low octane fuel better?

I've read a number of people say they dont bother with premium fuel because their car runs better on low octane... I'm just wondering if anyone can back this up with some reasoning.

Cheers
Old 01-20-05, 04:22 AM
  #2  
HEAVY METAL THUNDER

 
rotary emotions's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Elsenborn, Belgian Eifel
Posts: 3,864
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If that was true we wouldn't make any power overhere: the lowest we get is 95ron, the next being 98 and 99+.
The thruth is not lower is better for the engine, but just that higher isn't needed. In other words: why bother buying expensive (hell, what's expensive, you guys pay way less then us) fuel if cheaper will do just as good.
One execption though: high powered (high boost) turbo engines will benefit from better fuel as it will help avoiding early detonation which, esp. under boost, can be fatal for the apexseals. If you're running NA, you don't need the better fuel. But it won't harm either.
Old 01-20-05, 04:28 AM
  #3  
Rotary Enthusiast

Thread Starter
 
H4Inf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: The World
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ah so basically its because the compression is relatively low, theres no need.

Are there any figures/formulas that relate compression to the octane fuel used?
Old 01-20-05, 04:59 AM
  #4  
HEAVY METAL THUNDER

 
rotary emotions's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Elsenborn, Belgian Eifel
Posts: 3,864
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
it's not the compression only: one of the main problem area's in piston engines are the valves. After a while they get covered in carbon, and they become of course very hot. The combination of these two facts makes them rather troublesome. Fuel (or better: mixture of fuel and air) tends to burn around these hot valves, esp once they aren't perfectly smooth anymore (due to carbon build up etc). The incoming mixture always has to pass these hot valves, so some will tend to ingite there. Higher compression makes this worse.
In a rotary engine, even a higher compression one, this problem does not occur. First of all, they don't have valves. Second, the hot spot of the engine (combustion chamber) is perfectly sealed from the cold (intake area) one. Whereas in a piston engine, the intake is of course right in the hot area. Therefor valves etc never really cool down.
The incoming mixture in a rotary engine will stay relatively cool (at least not hot enough for self-ignition) up to the moment where it is ready to be burned.
Old 01-20-05, 08:14 AM
  #5  
Rotary Enthusiast

Thread Starter
 
H4Inf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: The World
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That is a rather nice feature Thanks for the info!
Old 01-20-05, 10:52 AM
  #6  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
christaylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 1,546
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Lower octane = higher heat content = good. The rotary isn't thermally efficient, so it wants higher heat content. Back in the day, before the 7 (I think) the Mazda pits at LeMans and other endurance races smelled like Kerosene.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Queppa
New Member RX-7 Technical
8
09-02-18 09:53 AM
Jeff20B
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
4
06-26-16 10:21 AM
alphawolff
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
17
11-17-15 05:57 PM



Quick Reply: Low octane fuel better?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:38 PM.