1st Generation Specific (1979-1985) 1979-1985 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections

The Big Question.... Fuelie or no-fuelie

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-25-05, 12:19 PM
  #1  
Junior Member

Thread Starter
 
Kweasi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Big Question.... Fuelie or no-fuelie

Hey all,

I've got an 83' with a very agressively ported (but not bridge) 12a on which I'm currently running a Nikki with uprated jets and accelerator pump; but it's time I upgraded. I don't want to go the webber/dellorto/mukuni/etc route; as I don't want to deal with the constant fiddling so I've got it down to two choices:

Sterling or Megasquirt.

As I see it the benefits of the MS are: wicked tunability, wicked power potential, easy starting, better fuel economy and the sheer gadgetude of it. The disadvantages are CO$T, difficulty (agrovation) of install, need for an uprated fuel system, need for a custom manifold.

The sterling on the other hand, is way cheaper, way easier to install but I question if I'll see the performance gain I'm hopping for. I've been told by the local Rotary expert that my motor should be good for over 160hp if I can get enough air into it; will the sterling do this while still maintaining decend idle quality, fuel economy and easy starting?

I would appreicate your collective input, particularly from those of you who have one or the other (Sterling or Megasquirt).

Thanks,
-Kwe
Old 02-25-05, 03:29 PM
  #2  
Lapping = Fapping

iTrader: (13)
 
Jeff20B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Near Seattle
Posts: 15,725
Received 70 Likes on 64 Posts
I have a MegaSquirt but haven't run it yet because I have another project that needs to get done first.
Old 02-25-05, 10:09 PM
  #3  
Moderator

iTrader: (3)
 
diabolical1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: FL
Posts: 10,823
Received 307 Likes on 268 Posts
Originally Posted by Kweasi
I've been told by the local Rotary expert that my motor should be good for over 160hp if I can get enough air into it; ...
160 HP with the porting you describe sounds a bit conservative to me, but i'll leave that alone.

anyway, you're probably better off just PM'ing Sterling or Rx7Carl and having a talk with them. you can share your goals and concerns. i'm pretty confident that you'll get honest answers.

personally, i'd get something with a better flowing manifold and go with the fuel injection, but you listed just as many minuses as you did pluses, so ultimately only you can decide what you are and are not willing to do for better flow.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cook11
V-8 Powered RX-7's
1
10-02-15 11:52 AM
FC3S Timmy
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
8
10-02-15 08:08 AM



Quick Reply: The Big Question.... Fuelie or no-fuelie



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:36 PM.