1st Generation Specific (1979-1985) 1979-1985 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections

80 intake on a 83

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 30, 2006 | 09:24 PM
  #1  
Qbuilt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
From: EDMONTON ALBERTA
80 intake on a 83

Hi guys,
I was just wondering if anybody has put an 79-80 intake onto a 81-85 12a. I have an intake off an 80 that i have cleaned up and what not, but have noticed that it looks a little different from the 83 one i have just taken off the car. My main concern is that there is a rectangular port right below the primary intake ports on the 83 intake manifold. The 80 does not have this. What is the reason for this? The 80 12a block i have has this rectangular notch below the ports that lines up with the 83 intake but on the block it is just a notch, doesnt go in or lead anywhere. Really doesnt look like its used for anything. Especially since the intake does not have the port. However on my engine right now, 83, its all gunky and oily inside the notch and i cant tell if it goes any deeper into the block. Can i just make my gasket to block this off??
Any input is greatly appreciated.
Thanks
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2006 | 09:49 PM
  #2  
Hades12's Avatar
Burning Oil-Grinding 3rd
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,094
Likes: 1
From: Union Mills NC
The 80 does not have the anti backfire valve like the 83. It has been said that the 79 and 80 are better then the later ones.
Reply
Old May 22, 2006 | 12:23 PM
  #3  
tboltkc's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
From: Liberty, MO
Bringing this back from the dead a little, but found this in the search and had another question.

I am going to put an '80 mani on a (I think) '81 block. From the info above, it sounds like I can just use the 79/80 gasket set and call it good? Right not the car has a Weber on it that I am probably taking off, and I assume it doesn't have the anti-backfire valve either.

Just want to make sure I get the right gasket for my application since they are different part numbers.
Reply
Old May 22, 2006 | 02:52 PM
  #4  
IanS's Avatar
Ricer
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 4,424
Likes: 1
From: Washington, Iowa
ooh, yes I too would like to know about the gasket. I have the same scenario going on with my 80 intake manifold.
Reply
Old May 24, 2006 | 01:27 PM
  #5  
Jeff20B's Avatar
Lapping = Fapping
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 15,725
Likes: 91
From: Near Seattle
'76-'80 engines used thermal reactors. The rotor housings on these engines had small ports communicating with the exhaust through the exhaust port sleeves and the thermal reactor through a hole down near the lower exhaust stud. The rectangular port below the primary intake ports on the intermediate plate, was unused. It's fine to use a '79-'80 manifold on these engines or any engine which has these rotor housings.

The '74-'75 and '81-'85 engines made use of the rectangular port below the intermediate intake ports. If you want to use a '79-'80 manifold, you can fill this port with devcon, quicksteel or any other steel putty (just make sure you clean the carbon and oil from the inside first). This is easiest if the engine is apart for a rebuild. I'm probably leaving some info out, but that's the basic idea.

The engine I'm building for my rotary MG Midget project will use some '76-'78 rotor housings and a '76 manifold which also does not cover the rectangular port below the intermediate ports. The intermediate plate is most likely from an '81-'85 12A; it's a tall port Y casting with a carbon filled rectangular port. The tall ports match the reversed runner '76 Cosmo manifold in which the primaries actually flow to the front and rear plates, and the secondaries are port matched (tall) which is is ok since the secondaries only open at high RPM anyway. Strange, but it supposedly gives up some throttle response for increased torque. The nice thing is the secondaries come on nice and quick. I've already tested it and had good results in this car with a light steel flywheel (primary throttle response was actually plenty quick), plus it's the only manifold that will fit comfortably without modding the car etc.
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:45 AM.