Time Slips and Dyno Section is for posting 1/4 mile time slips and dyno graphs

best 1/4 on stock turbos?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 1, 2005 | 10:40 PM
  #1  
vhalin's Avatar
Thread Starter
manned by boarderators
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
From: Fremont Ca
best 1/4 on stock turbos?

Whats the best 1/4 time here on stock turbos? Are 11s achievable on stock turbos?
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2005 | 10:41 PM
  #2  
Mahjik's Avatar
Mr. Links
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 27,595
Likes: 43
From: Kansas City, MO
Originally Posted by vhalin
Are 11s achievable on stock turbos?

Yes.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2005 | 01:00 PM
  #3  
Fd3BOOST's Avatar
Recovering Milkaholic
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 8,206
Likes: 0
From: Budds Creek, Maryland
I don't have the thread link handy but John (forgetting screen name) from Jersey went 10.9's on twins and posted the time slip in the N.E. forum. I know many who have been 11's on the twins.
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2005 | 11:35 PM
  #4  
iron4jones's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, Texas
If you go to www.rxtuner.com and go to the articles and scroll down, you will see and article called "Evil Twins". I dont personally know the guy but he went like 10.9 on stock twins non-sequential. Pretty interesting article.
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2005 | 07:32 PM
  #5  
Boostn7's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 867
Likes: 0
From: Union, NJ
Originally Posted by vhalin
Whats the best 1/4 time here on stock turbos? Are 11s achievable on stock turbos?
YES :-) 11's is definetely achievable on the stock twins.....mainly non-seq ones.

Just need the obvious required bolt-ons....injectors, fuel pump, intercooler, ECU upgrade, exhaust and so on....

JD
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2005 | 02:54 PM
  #6  
Twitch1's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
From: CA San diego area
Have any of you located that video that they are talking about? I tried finding it on www.vwsport.com but still counld not locate it
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2005 | 11:44 PM
  #7  
Boostn7's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 867
Likes: 0
From: Union, NJ
Originally Posted by Twitch1
Have any of you located that video that they are talking about? I tried finding it on www.vwsport.com but still counld not locate it
Wow....alot has changed with the vwsport.com website. Wonder were all the videos went !!!

Here's another link to it anyway...
http://car-trix.com/movies/10.98@121.mpg

JD
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2005 | 08:04 PM
  #8  
Twitch1's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
From: CA San diego area
WOW ......Thanks
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2005 | 06:41 PM
  #9  
efini_fd3s's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
From: Irvine, CA
I remember one of my friends showing me that post way before I joined this forum. The guy said he was going to rebuild his engine so he cranked up the boost and went to see how fast he could go in the 1/4 mile.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2005 | 12:10 PM
  #10  
Boostn7's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 867
Likes: 0
From: Union, NJ
Originally Posted by efini_fd3s
I remember one of my friends showing me that post way before I joined this forum. The guy said he was going to rebuild his engine so he cranked up the boost and went to see how fast he could go in the 1/4 mile.

Weird, I don't remember ever saying or thinking that........

After running numerous 11.0-11.2's it was a matter of time and good traction, therefore I kept trying......and motor was still the same 'til early this year.

JD
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2005 | 09:32 PM
  #11  
TwinTurbo_SE7EN's Avatar
resU deretsigeR
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 675
Likes: 0
From: TN
Originally Posted by Boostn7
Weird, I don't remember ever saying or thinking that........

After running numerous 11.0-11.2's it was a matter of time and good traction, therefore I kept trying......and motor was still the same 'til early this year.

JD
how much boost did you run? Were your twins modified (other than the essential non-seq. stuff)?

I just ran a 12.43 @ 114 with a 1.99 60 ft. on et streets. I'd like to go faster.
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2005 | 10:31 PM
  #12  
Full Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 112
Likes: 1
From: USA
Meineke 93 Rx7 12.10 @ 115mph

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

93 Touring Twins Non Sequential, Air To Water Intercooler, Stock Ignition, Haltec E6k, Stock Injectors, Ported Upper & Lower Intake, Ported Turbo Manifolds, Twin Cold Air Intake. Kumho Street Tires

Dyno @ Rx7.com 313 Hp 250 Ft Lbs.


12.10 @ 115
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2006 | 03:39 PM
  #13  
Twitch1's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
From: CA San diego area
Originally Posted by Boostn7
Weird, I don't remember ever saying or thinking that........

After running numerous 11.0-11.2's it was a matter of time and good traction, therefore I kept trying......and motor was still the same 'til early this year.

JD

What tire pressure where you running? What Rpm did u launch at, more info
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2006 | 07:46 PM
  #14  
DaiOni's Avatar
Wankler
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,565
Likes: 2
From: Kobe, Japan
a series 7 in australia ran 11.2@121 on the stock sequential system. What's most shocking - did it on the stock fuel system (well, he swears that he did) - we worked that to be injector duty @ 99%

I'm well dubious, but there is vid and timeslip to back up the time

not sure if this link still works: http://www.mazdarotaryclub.com/forum...s/wsid_rx7.avi
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2006 | 10:53 PM
  #15  
mdpalmer's Avatar
T O R Q U E!
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,034
Likes: 1
From: far far away
Question

Originally Posted by Boostn7
YES :-) 11's is definetely achievable on the stock twins.....mainly non-seq ones.

Just need the obvious required bolt-ons....injectors, fuel pump, intercooler, ECU upgrade, exhaust and so on....

JD
Hmm... Very nice. What is the estimated (or known) hp/torque on this motor/setup? I'm very curious. Also what was the weight at time of racing?

EDIt: oops.... just saw your profile:

JD
94 White FD
*stock motor & turbos/pump gas*
-11.56@ 122 mph( Nitto drags)
-402 rwh-356rwt -dynoed

*Ported-motor/stock twins/pump gas*
-10.98 @ 122.9mph(ET streets)
-11.08 @ 125.3mph ( Nitto drags)

so were you making more power with the ported motor? enough to shave off that extra 0.58 seconds? Damn..... how long did that engine last you?

Last edited by mdpalmer; Mar 14, 2006 at 10:56 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2006 | 02:48 AM
  #16  
OBX3's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
From: California United States
11' would be very nice on stock turbo's..
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2006 | 04:07 AM
  #17  
Narfle's Avatar
Rx7 Wagon
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 6,989
Likes: 893
From: California
Ill be happy if I run low 12's with everything but a standalone to really run the poor turbos into the ground.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2006 | 10:13 AM
  #18  
cloead's Avatar
sold--no longer in debt
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,659
Likes: 11
From: Cleveland, Ohio
On my old car with stock seq twins I was running 14psi through the stock ic.. it was good for high 11's heh.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2006 | 10:51 AM
  #19  
Narfle's Avatar
Rx7 Wagon
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 6,989
Likes: 893
From: California
Youre a brave man. I reckon ill have my scramble boost set up near that.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2006 | 12:27 PM
  #20  
Rotarded's Avatar
"Challenged" since 1993
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 540
Likes: 0
From: Columbus, Oh
11.83 @ 15 psi, 1.77 60 foot, stock diff, Non-sequential, all the bolt ons
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2006 | 12:30 PM
  #21  
Narfle's Avatar
Rx7 Wagon
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 6,989
Likes: 893
From: California
was that with a PFC?
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2006 | 12:39 PM
  #22  
Veritas
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
From: Dublin, OH
Yeah he had a PFC for that.
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2006 | 12:44 AM
  #23  
94blkFD's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
From: texas
went 11.8 at 12 pounds, with stock turbo and sequential setup. dyno at 335whp and 118mph trap speed. And may I say street tires too..
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2006 | 06:04 PM
  #24  
Fsunoles06's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 292
Likes: 0
From: Pearland/Houston
well i'm hoping to break into the 11's.

I'd like to know if 11's seem achivable with a mildly aggressive street tune up to not exceeding 15psi while on street tires. Completely new suspension bushings and balljoints.

Heres a full list of mods done to the car.

full non-seq twins w/ ported wastegate
mild street port w/ port matched UIM and LIM
full open 3" exhaust w/ APEXi GT Catback
Magnacor Plug wires
M2 Performance Carbon Fiber Intake w/ aluminum piping
ASP Large SMIC w/ Greddy Elbow
Koyo Radiator
1300cc Secondaries
Greddy Pully Kit
Greddy Strut Bar
ACT Street/Strip Clutch
APEXi Power FC
PLX Wideband
Greddy Profec Type S
Improved grounds w/ 10 gauge wiring

what kind of power do the guys who have been her before expect to be put down at 15 psi?
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2006 | 07:04 PM
  #25  
matty's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,014
Likes: 40
From: CT
Originally Posted by 94blkFD
went 11.8 at 12 pounds, with stock turbo and sequential setup. dyno at 335whp and 118mph trap speed. And may I say street tires too..
118mph at only 12 psi. WOW!
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:46 PM.