Stock Port N/A with AFC Neo Tune
Max Tune
Base Power: 134 whp @ 7200 rpm Base Torque: 109 lb-ft @ 4750 rpm After Tune Max Power: 143 whp @ 7300 rpm Max Torque: 110 lb-ft @ 4750 rpm Mods: K&N Drop-In Intake Filter Racing Beat Road Race True Dual Exhaust AFC Neo + Dyno Tune (15's for cruise, 13's for load) |
What year is this? not bad man!! Probably about 160ish hp?
You should look into porting your UIM and LIM now! |
Its an S5 with a conservative tune. Should yield more power with a better tune later.
|
S5s have 160 stock at the crank I thought. Shouldn't it be higher for an S5 block with open exhaust and an AFC Neo?
|
We had very little time to tune the car. With more tuning, the power will increase.
|
probably could benefit from a standalone or a true cold air box, plus a custom intake manifold......
But I'm happy with the way it's running now, though it would've been nice if the 5th and 6th ports hadn't stuck open in the low end! |
Those # seem low to me, I dynoed last weekend, s4 with 180k miles, RB header to silencer, 2.5 single racing, straight through muffler. I have a good CAI pulling air from outside of the engine bay, right in front of the pass. tire. I made 126.27HP @ 5900 and 122.68 TRQ, between 42-4600, with the six ports closed. With them wired open, it made 142.69HP @ 6100, and 126.70 TRQ @ 56-6500 where it drops 5-8 lbs to 7 grand. But over all, without a tune, that a damn good base to start from!
|
^^ I agree it seems low too like I said. I thought to myself his mods should put him considerably higher and pondered if his VDI and 6PI are working. I hope you guys can get a good deal more power out of it!
|
I wonder what you'd gain with a paired off intake of the right runner length ;)
|
Did you guys ever get the tuning done? what were you able to get?
|
We located the problem with the run:
The secondary throttle plates weren't opening up, the thermovalve that usually opens at 75 F didn't open until 200+ F, so they were closed on the dyno. Still, it's pretty nice to be making 143 hp with primary throttle plates only! |
hah, yeah. Those butterflies are removed on my car promptly after purchase. Pull those things out and get it to the dyno again! I'm interested in your results!
|
Most power for the money on an N/A
Exhaust & piggyback... |
Stock Port N/A with ITS Rtek7 Tune
please delete this post
|
Roen, What'd you end up getting for power on this setup?
|
I haven't redynoed it yet!
Gimme a couple of weeks, I should be able to get a side-by-side dyno with the GTUs. According to the accelerometer I have in the car, I've made 177 bhp. |
cai install
anything crazy i need to now to install a cai on my 87 TII. ? I know its a noob question. but help me out if you know something i dont
|
um, i don't have a CAI.
|
I'll be watching to see what you get! I'm going to put an AFC NEO onto my FC soon too. I suppose 17bhp increase is not too bad from just a tune. I imagine I'm over that right now though with my intake port matching and TB mod along with my exhaust. Stock S5 is ~160 bhp I think, so it seems you may still be having 6PI or VDI opening problems?
Your RB exhaust should put you near that on a stock engine alone. I'll bet your next tune and dyno you get more that 177! |
no, both systems seem to kick in fine, who knows.....
That was the in car accelerometer......not the most trustworthy, but a good baseline indicator. It definitely doesn't feel like the 170 whp of my other car. |
could you show the maping/air/fuel ratio on the neo?
|
Sure, on my next dyno
|
https://www.rx7club.com/time-slips-dyno-128/5-dyno-runs-today-some-interesting-conclusions-743510/#post8034867
Jrat, either you got the most power you could get from this motor, or the motor has gotten weaker in the months in between the two dyno sessions. I think this really is the limitation of the AFC though, the Rtek is a much better choice for people debating which to get. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:37 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands