Another T78 Dyno Thread..
1 Attachment(s)
Hey guys Just got my car Dyno tuned last weekend, my setup is basically a stockport motor with a t78, the car was only tuned for 14.5 pounds ( due to the wastegate spring) and i ended up making 347whp and 301 wtq on a mustang dyno. I had an opprotunity to get tuned by a very good tuner from new jersey, and i am pleased with the results, also does anybody have an idea of about how much power it would have read on a dynojet? i read somewhere that the difference is about 12%, but i'm not too sure. Car was tuned by Abraham Alba, here's the video:
Dynosheet: Attachment 678301 |
Originally Posted by drftinmx6
(Post 11413635)
Hey guys Just got my car Dyno tuned last weekend, my setup is basically a stockport motor with a t78, the car was only tuned for 14.5 pounds ( due to the wastegate spring) and i ended up making 347whp and 301 wtq on a mustang dyno. I had an opprotunity to get tuned by a very good tuner from new jersey, and i am pleased with the results, also does anybody have an idea of about how much power it would have read on a dynojet? i read somewhere that the difference is about 12%, but i'm not too sure. Car was tuned by Abraham Alba, here's the video:
1. Brian Diaz tuned by Abraham Alba. T78. - YouTube Dynosheet: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...ps87a01bfa.jpg |
Car sounded really good. Healthy motor done by eccentric performance. And the tune was crisp. Abraham did an amazing job on it.
|
Mustangs read about 10% lower than a Dynojet. Your numbers seem a little low but as long as the car runs well I wouldn't worry about it.
|
looks like a professional shop.
NOT! all things aside, that is not a safe way to run a dyno. Especially where that fat ass guy with the rusky hat is standing. One minor problem with the tie-down and his fat ass will shrink real quick when the car flattens him against the lift post. IMO there shouldnt be anyone within 15ft of a dyno run except the person pressing on the gas pedal. |
Those numbers are low even for that dyno. My old T78 was at about 400 around that psi. I was street ported though.
|
i figured the tuner told me he kept it pretty conservative, but the car feels great on the road so i'm happy with it for now, they're just numbers, it could really read anything depending on how it's set up. so i'm not too worried about it.
|
i say 400whp on a dynojet . i hate those mustang dynos lol pretty sure that turbo works alot better on higher boost then that
|
Originally Posted by bmwrx7man
(Post 11416817)
i say 400whp on a dynojet . i hate those mustang dynos lol pretty sure that turbo works alot better on higher boost then that
|
Originally Posted by Jason
(Post 11413790)
Mustangs read about 10% lower than a Dynojet. Your numbers seem a little low but as long as the car runs well I wouldn't worry about it.
https://www.rx7club.com/time-slips-d...w-dyno-613443/ |
Is it just me or does any one else hear the breakup on the top end? Suprised not reflected on the dyno grap.
350@ 1 bar does seem low for that turbo, but stock ports are limiting |
Originally Posted by Bacon
(Post 11424958)
Is it just me or does any one else hear the breakup on the top end? Suprised not reflected on the dyno grap.
350@ 1 bar does seem low for that turbo, but stock ports are limiting |
i make around 60-70whp less on a mustang dyno. but its just a number. i actually like tuning on them since everyone thinks you have a slow car then next thing you know you have a bus length on them lol.
|
Originally Posted by 82streetracer
(Post 11414433)
looks like a professional shop.
NOT! all things aside, that is not a safe way to run a dyno. Especially where that fat ass guy with the rusky hat is standing. One minor problem with the tie-down and his fat ass will shrink real quick when the car flattens him against the lift post. IMO there shouldnt be anyone within 15ft of a dyno run except the person pressing on the gas pedal. |
Originally Posted by smg944
(Post 11434096)
i make around 60-70whp less on a mustang dyno. but its just a number. i actually like tuning on them since everyone thinks you have a slow car then next thing you know you have a bus length on them lol.
|
Originally Posted by junito1
(Post 11434118)
People.like you is why this world is.so lame!!! Go nag somewhere else you square.
|
Originally Posted by Bacon
(Post 11424958)
Is it just me or does any one else hear the breakup on the top end? Suprised not reflected on the dyno grap.
350@ 1 bar does seem low for that turbo, but stock ports are limiting |
Originally Posted by deftones1868
(Post 11434179)
I thought the same thing! @ 9-10seconds it sounds like it breaks up but it might be distorted sound as well.
|
Originally Posted by drftinmx6
(Post 11434186)
Yeah I believe it's distorted sound now that I listen to it again, the video was recorded from a phone
|
Originally Posted by Bacon
(Post 11434739)
Yes its literally a blip,, then 2-300 more rpm then blip blip blip, then he gets out of it, would have like to see him pull it to 7,500
|
I can bare witness to the 'pullage' his tune consists of. That dyno must have read very very low. Tune held up well on the Dragon.
...Thanks B, the M3 is scared to come out of the garage now |
Originally Posted by smg944
(Post 11434096)
i make around 60-70whp less on a mustang dyno. but its just a number. i actually like tuning on them since everyone thinks you have a slow car then next thing you know you have a bus length on them lol.
|
Mustang dyno's are known as heart breakers, now you know why ahhaa. Just use a dyno for tuning purposes, they all show different numbers like stated above. As long as the tune is correct, you're good to go!
|
OOH.. this thread has gotten me all excited!
I've got a T78 I need to get up and running. Problem is I am a little low on funding at the moment and still need to get a PFC and intercooler. I was thinking of running a cheaper M-spec, or god-speed FMIC with it so I can get the project moving faster. anybody with t-78's been successful with cheaper inter cooler options? I see it as the item I may be able to save a little money on and spend towards engine management and gauges instead. any input? |
Originally Posted by Rotary Madman
(Post 11449950)
OOH.. this thread has gotten me all excited!
I've got a T78 I need to get up and running. Problem is I am a little low on funding at the moment and still need to get a PFC and intercooler. I was thinking of running a cheaper M-spec, or god-speed FMIC with it so I can get the project moving faster. anybody with t-78's been successful with cheaper inter cooler options? I see it as the item I may be able to save a little money on and spend towards engine management and gauges instead. any input? |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:43 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands