Single Turbo RX-7's Questions about all aspects of single turbo setups.

Is 2.5" Intercooler piping too small???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 12, 2012 | 01:22 PM
  #1  
fd3s20b's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 128
Likes: 1
From: Mass
Is 2.5" Intercooler piping too small???

I am currently going to a single turbo (S472) but is 2.5" intercooler piping too small for this application?

I would like to run 3" piping but the intercooler I would like to use only offers 2.5" inlet/outlet tubes.

So would I be better off using 3" pipes and reducing it to 2.5" at the intercooler or just use 2.5" all the way through and just reduce it right from the turbo outlet which is 3"?

Thanks for any and all input. Trying to figure this out before I place my order.
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2012 | 05:56 PM
  #2  
thewird's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,603
Likes: 15
From: Toronto, Canada
2.5" is probably a restriction for that turbo. I would switch intercoolers personally but if you don't want to do that, keep it 3" all the way to the intercooler.

thewird
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2012 | 10:06 PM
  #3  
fd3s20b's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 128
Likes: 1
From: Mass
After much thinking I think you are right. I would hate to choke that turbo with too small of a piping. I will have to choose another intercooler. Any sugestions?
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2012 | 11:14 PM
  #4  
thewird's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,603
Likes: 15
From: Toronto, Canada
Have BELL intercoolers make an intercooler to your specifications. People spend way too much with namebrand crap which often doesn't fully suit their application.

thewird
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2012 | 12:12 AM
  #5  
RENESISFD's Avatar
Wastegate John
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,979
Likes: 9
From: Long Island NY 11746
^ And bell is not a name brand?
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2012 | 12:14 AM
  #6  
thewird's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,603
Likes: 15
From: Toronto, Canada
No, they actually make the intercoolers, not resell someone elses core with ridiculous markup.

thewird
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2012 | 12:16 AM
  #7  
RENESISFD's Avatar
Wastegate John
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,979
Likes: 9
From: Long Island NY 11746
I know about them. They are a widely known brand. I actually have one of their cores on my car.

It was $400 just for the core. I have no idea how much the custom endtanks would cost. That why it may be cheaper to get something used
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2012 | 12:28 AM
  #8  
thewird's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,603
Likes: 15
From: Toronto, Canada
My 3.5"x11.0"x14.0" core with endtanks was $676. I like there endtanks, they flare the outlets and have nice curves leading up to them. Not a boxy setup. This is from a previous intercooler I had them make...



thewird
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2012 | 05:58 AM
  #9  
fd3s20b's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 128
Likes: 1
From: Mass
The Bell intercooler looks like a quality unit. I'll have to look into it. Thanks for the info.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2012 | 01:24 PM
  #10  
sngl13b's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
From: pennsylvania
bell are very good..however they aren't cheap,but good things usually aren't
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2012 | 08:55 PM
  #11  
MazdaSpeedDan's Avatar
Cav Scout
Tenured Member 10 Years
Veteran: Army
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,101
Likes: 3
From: East Coast
I have 3' piping with a 2.5 intercooler. Mine works fine.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2012 | 09:06 PM
  #12  
thewird's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,603
Likes: 15
From: Toronto, Canada
Originally Posted by MazdaSpeedDan
I have 3' piping with a 2.5 intercooler. Mine works fine.
That information is not helping anyone LOL

thewird
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2012 | 09:49 PM
  #13  
MazdaSpeedDan's Avatar
Cav Scout
Tenured Member 10 Years
Veteran: Army
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,101
Likes: 3
From: East Coast
Originally Posted by thewird
That information is not helping anyone LOL

thewird
Yes it is. At least now he knows its a option and can be done.

Originally Posted by thewird
I would like to run 3" piping but the intercooler I would like to use only offers 2.5" inlet/outlet tubes.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2012 | 09:53 PM
  #14  
thewird's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,603
Likes: 15
From: Toronto, Canada
That's obvious from the get go >_>. It could be done with 2" too, that's an option as well right?

thewird
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2012 | 10:21 PM
  #15  
MazdaSpeedDan's Avatar
Cav Scout
Tenured Member 10 Years
Veteran: Army
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,101
Likes: 3
From: East Coast
Originally Posted by thewird
That's obvious from the get go >_>. It could be done with 2" too, that's an option as well right?

thewird
That's obvious from the get go 0_o. It could be done with 1" too, that's an option as well right?
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2012 | 10:21 PM
  #16  
thewird's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,603
Likes: 15
From: Toronto, Canada
Pretty much, car would still run

thewird
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2012 | 08:30 PM
  #17  
PiginaBlanket's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
From: California
Question for Wird. Shouldn't OP be fine retaining his IC Considering the IC would nullify the effects of charge air heated from the 3in. to 2.5in piping change? Also the 2.5 piping is too short to create any real issue? Idk I've been nerding out just wanted to see if off base or not.
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2012 | 12:36 PM
  #18  
Zero R's Avatar
Just in time to die
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,143
Likes: 1
From: look behind you
You should run no smaller than the compressor discharge. If your turbo has a 2.5" outlet run no less than 2.5", if it is a 3" outlet run no less than 3".

Ideally you need to look at the IC end tanks separately as they each do things differently. On the compressor side it should be thought of as a diffuser both slowing down and spreading out the airflow evenly over the core. If you could gradually step up from your 3" discharge to 3.25" or 3.5" just before the tank and then have the tank "fan out" over the core it would work very well.

On the IC discharge side it needs to be viewed as a "nozzle" speeding up air velocity into the engine, this means a end tank that tapers inward to the outlet tubing which ideally would step down (ie cone off of the tank from the 3.25-3.5" to 2.5" this will help pick up the lost velocity and aid with reducing pressure drop. Nothing is more backwards than seeing a IC being fed with a 2.5" pipe and then has a outlet of 3" or more. Your airspeed has been reduced and needs to be regained. Let's not even get into it is also now more dense requiring less volume.

Bell cores are not expensive at all, they are all I use simply because they are a known quantity, that being the flow rate they give is conservative and at 10psi. This means I know I can size a core properly not just guess at it. Way too many IC cores are just oversized for no real benefit or gain.

~S~

Last edited by Zero R; Aug 10, 2012 at 12:38 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2012 | 05:33 PM
  #19  
PiginaBlanket's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
From: California
Thanks for the clarification, I wanted to hear someone apply some fluid dynamics with the real world situations. so basically your saying, slow down coming in for better spread through core, and accelerate out. My track car runs 2 .75 to 3 then 3 back to 2.75 I didn't set it up this way, I built it on a budget and it just happend to work out like that.
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2012 | 07:28 PM
  #20  
jfolsom28's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: United States
Go with 4inch
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2012 | 05:31 AM
  #21  
Phaat's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: auckland, NZ
ive got 3 inch with my single setup i wouldnt go smaller
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2012 | 11:22 PM
  #22  
abc's Avatar
abc
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
From: Central
2.5" works just fine with 450whp. I'd go with a 3" if your considering 550+
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2012 | 02:32 PM
  #23  
G's 3rd Gen's Avatar
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,066
Likes: 7
From: Home of the Rolex 24
Originally Posted by abc
2.5" works just fine with 450whp. I'd go with a 3" if your considering 550+
agreed.
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2012 | 05:15 PM
  #24  
WLD 07's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 107
Likes: 3
From: Australia
A well known street registered 13b Rx3 over here made over 600whp and ran low nines with 2.5" intercooler piping.
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2012 | 08:33 AM
  #25  
hondahater's Avatar
spending too much money..
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 10,117
Likes: 1
From: louisiana
got an s472 on mine with an ebay 12x3x24 intercooler and 3" inlet and outlet. It screems! I had 2.5" piping on my 66mm turbo setup but going from 3.5" at the turbo down to 2.5" piping is just a huge restriction. I do however have a hillarious looking 3.5 to 2.5" 90 degree coupler if you decide on going the 2.5" piping route.

Attached Thumbnails Is 2.5" Intercooler piping too small???-mail.jpg  

Last edited by hondahater; Aug 18, 2012 at 08:47 AM.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:31 AM.