Dee Karagiannis PCS Test and tune video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zhn_Y2DtoU0
4.60@153 to the 1/8 would have like to gone the full quarter but it is only 1/8 mile track. I guess everyone is testing now ;) |
Very nice Dee :ylsuper:!! 153mph in the 1/8th is fly'n!
-J |
Originally Posted by rotor_dee
(Post 7799067)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zhn_Y2DtoU0
4.60@153 to the 1/8 would have like to gone the full quarter but it is only 1/8 mile track. I guess everyone is testing now ;) Nice clean pass btw. :) |
Thanks we learned alot last year, Made lots of small changes, hopefuly it will show during the regular season.
|
Originally Posted by rotor_dee
(Post 7799323)
Thanks we learned alot last year, Made lots of small changes, hopefuly it will show during the regular season.
|
great pass lookin good...
|
Nice job Dee. Car is rolling out for sure. Take care and I hope to see you run in person this season.
Dee E. |
Clean, straight run... Good luck n '08
|
4.60
Originally Posted by rotor_dee
(Post 7799067)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zhn_Y2DtoU0
4.60@153 to the 1/8 would have like to gone the full quarter but it is only 1/8 mile track. I guess everyone is testing now ;) |
2.3 I4 turbo?
Arent these the same motors(engine design) from ford? |
yes 2.3l I-4. This powerplant is shared on the Mazda 3, 6, and some of the ford products.
|
Originally Posted by rotorholic
(Post 7799621)
Hey Dee, How fast is the 4.60 equal to in the quater mile?
|
For reference on my 7.39 pass I went 4.79 @ 149 to the eight. Prob somewhere around 7.2 The car weighs 2350 and runs a 78mm turbo. Because i know someone wants to figure power output ;)
|
That looked like an awesome run. Car is straight and launched very nice.
Good luck this season.... L8R |
Looking good Dee. I cant wait to watch you this season and hangin with the crew
|
Originally Posted by rotor_dee
(Post 7800093)
For reference on my 7.39 pass I went 4.79 @ 149 to the eight. Prob somewhere around 7.2 The car weighs 2350 and runs a 78mm turbo. Because i know someone wants to figure power output ;)
Dee E. |
Originally Posted by rotor_dee
(Post 7800093)
For reference on my 7.39 pass I went 4.79 @ 149 to the eight. Prob somewhere around 7.2 The car weighs 2350 and runs a 78mm turbo. Because i know someone wants to figure power output ;)
This is no mystery!!! They sure know how to make power, thnx for sharing the video Dee |
Very nice.
|
Thanks Rotorious, how is your project coming?
|
Originally Posted by rotor_dee
(Post 7799067)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zhn_Y2DtoU0
4.60@153 to the 1/8 would have like to gone the full quarter but it is only 1/8 mile track. I guess everyone is testing now ;) Very nice DEE....to go from 7.4013b then a 4cyl to the same ..good stuff. God bless |
Straight as an arrow!
|
Holy crap i just heard the funniest thing in that video i never heard before. Turn your volume up and at the end you will here a local comment on the pass. LOL
|
Originally Posted by rotor_dee
(Post 7806762)
Holy crap i just heard the funniest thing in that video i never heard before. Turn your volume up and at the end you will here a local comment on the pass. LOL
I can't make it out. |
"dat btch wuz gittin it" LOL
|
Originally Posted by rotor_dee
(Post 7807174)
"dat btch wuz gittin it" LOL
|
Originally Posted by rotor_dee
(Post 7804033)
Thanks Rotorious, how is your project coming?
|
If you need any info on tuning on methanol etc etc I would be glad to tell you what i know or dont know :)
|
It does make a clean run.. no doubt.. But jesus MAN. HE is rocking a FORD engine. That engine used to go on merkur turbos.(single cam version) ANd on other cars suck as the thunderbird turbo from the 80's and a few mustangs if i recall correctly.
One thing about those motors is... they could take 20 psi on the stock block like nothing...and great torque. but i hate those shits. I hope mazda redesigned it. |
I do not think that 2.3 has anything in common with the old iron head SOHC 2.3.
|
the same way the MX-6 turbos didnt have the probe turbo motor right?
yeah right. The block is probably nearly 80% original ford design. The heads now on the mazda is a twincam so thats 100% mazda engineering. PS. sick rx3!!!!!! |
There are many differences between the old iron sohc 2.3 and the all aluminum dohc 2.3 most of wich i just covered in this one sentence.
For the record there are about two generations of blocks that have had major changes from the generation of engine you are describing. The MZR block, wich has made as much as 1100whp and the DISI wich has made as much as 1300whp. The old 2.3 and the new 2.3 are as about as much a like as the rotary that chevy made to put in the corvette and the one we have grown to love in our cars LOL!! |
well different metals.. yes...
same bore? same stroke? same block, as in measurements. |
A 302 ford and a 350 chevy are the same bore too :) .
|
If i drill 4 91 mm holes in a sheet of plywood is that a 2.3l ford engine also LOL
Sorry I could not ressit. Yes they are both four cyl yes they are both 2.3l and this makes them similar and just about as similar as any other 4cyl that is around that same displacement honda, DSM, toyota, chevy etc etc. They are all just a little different :) |
Dee Karagiannis PCS Test and tune video
so what kind of boost are you running and how much torque are you making like ball park figures.
|
Car is running 45psi and torque is right about 1000
|
Dee Karagiannis PCS Test and tune video
so after racing both rotary and piston what are the differences between them if any that you have noticed.
|
That is a very difficult question but i will try my best to answer.
From a technical standpoint the biggest difference in racing a rotary powered car vs a piston powered car a side from the different engines is the way they make power. This created a huge learning curve for us when it came to gearing, fourlink, shocks, clutch and launching procedures because prior to this race car, the only race cars we ever raced were rotary powered. |
Originally Posted by rotor_dee
(Post 7825114)
That is a very difficult question but i will try my best to answer.
From a technical standpoint the biggest difference in racing a rotary powered car vs a piston powered car a side from the different engines is the way they make power. This created a huge learning curve for us when it came to gearing, fourlink, shocks, clutch and launching procedures because prior to this race car, the only race cars we ever raced were rotary powered. |
I have not totally left.....I don't thing that is possible :)
|
Originally Posted by rotor_dee
(Post 7827028)
I have not totally left.....I don't thing that is possible :)
|
Originally Posted by rotor_dee
(Post 7823117)
If i drill 4 91 mm holes in a sheet of plywood is that a 2.3l ford engine also LOL
Sorry I could not ressit. Yes they are both four cyl yes they are both 2.3l and this makes them similar and just about as similar as any other 4cyl that is around that same displacement honda, DSM, toyota, chevy etc etc. They are all just a little different :) SO all of you are saying that you are 100% sure that mazda and ford did not share info on the new mazda 2.3's You guys would be surprised how many manufacturers share designs and information. Especially since FOrd owns a huge part of mazda. |
No one is saying anything. I think we are not sure the point you are trying to make when you say "But jesus MAN. HE is rocking a FORD engine."
What we are saying is that those two engines are not exactly alike and if Mazda and ford work together that is not a good or bad thing just strictly informational just like chevy and saab on the ecotec or volvo and ford or Mitsu with Dodge. |
Originally Posted by rotor_dee
(Post 7827525)
volvo and ford
|
Cris,
It is real easy if you fill them with Hard-blok and run methanol LOL I have to admit learning a whole new "thing" was fun but having all this time to look at the old datalogs with the Rx7 I feel i could change a few things and go faster..Maybe one day LOL |
Originally Posted by rotor_dee
(Post 7827671)
Cris,
It is real easy if you fill them with Hard-blok and run methanol LOL I have to admit learning a whole new "thing" was fun but having all this time to look at the old datalogs with the Rx7 I feel i could change a few things and go faster..Maybe one day LOL You never stop learning. When you're racing professionally there's little time to mess with a combination and sometimes when you do it does not work in your favor. You gotta keep at it and eventually it pays off no matter what platform you chose to do so with. Imagine having a race track available to you 24hrs a day all year round. You could learn a lot in a short time. |
Originally Posted by rotor_dee
(Post 7827671)
Cris,
look at the old datalogs with the Rx7 I feel i could change a few things and go faster..Maybe one day LOL tell us more dee, if you please :) |
Jesus man, Your rocking a ford engine = damn i would love to see that car go down the track with a rotary...=/
WOuld you say its cheaper to maintain the 2.3 instead of the rotary? easier to make faster? |
Why did you go to a piston engine? Werent' you running a 20b before? I'm not trying to be a prick but this is a rotary drag racing forum. I kind of take this as you are trying to slap this in our faces here?
|
Originally Posted by ultimatejay
(Post 7828144)
I'm not trying to be a prick
I hope you have a flame suit! :lol: |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:35 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands