|
Originally Posted by jshiz
(Post 9179536)
Realist is a better term. I ride in a stock GSL SE. My car is slow as balls but it's fun as hell. Yes, I new civic si or a scion tc would burn it. But it's a fun car.
The guy you're trying to defend got butthurt when his car got called slow and posted some shit about disrespecting the rx7. A N/a rx7 is slow but it'll last forever pending you don't wreck it while doing something stupid. |
Originally Posted by pls91fc
(Post 9192789)
stupid shit
A stock GSL SE is faster and that car wasn't all that fast. here. I'll just name some random cars (taken from another forum) http://www.explorerforum.com/forums/...d.php?t=231495 1986 Mazda RX-7 GXL 8.5 16.5 1987 Mazda RX-7 Turbo 6.6 15.2 1988 Mazda RX-7 Conv. 9.7 17.5 1989 Mazda RX-7 GTU 8.5 16.5 1989 Mazda RX-7 Turbo 6.7 15.1 1990 Mazda RX-7 GTU 8.6 16.7 1991 Mazda RX-7 Conv. 8.8 16.7 1990 Isuzu Impulse 9.2 16.8 1986 Honda CRX Si 8.7 16.7 1988 Honda CRX Si 8.2 16.4 1991 Honda CRX Si 8.7 16.5 1989 Ford Taurus SHO 6.6 15.2 1988 Ford Probe GT 7.3 15.6 1990 Ford Probe GT 7.6 16.0 1984 Ford Mustang SVO 7.9 15.8 1985 Ford Mustang GT 6.4 14.9 (C&D, Jan. 85) 1987 Ford Mustang GT 6.4 14.4 (Automobile, April 87) 1988 Ford Mustang GT 6.4 15.0 (MT Jan '88) 1989 Ford Mustang GT 5.0l Manual 6.2 14.8 (MT Jan '89) 1990 Ford Mustang LX 5.0 6.4 14.9 1987 Chrysler LeBaron 8.8 16.8 1989 Mitsubishi Eclipse GS 7.2 15.8 1971 Datsun 240Z N/A 17.1 1972 Datsun 240Z 9.0 16.3 1974 Datsun 260Z 9.9 16.7 1983 Datsun 280ZX 9.4 16.9 |
You might be right but hell i didnt know the GSL-SE was faster than a n/a Fc. Learn something new everyday, love this forum. - Nick
|
The N/a FC only got 10 more hp than the GSL SE but got an added 300 lbs. The only thing the base FC has on a GSL SE is a better suspension.
|
jshiz, first of all that time sheet you posted is not very accurate due to the fact that it says the s4 and s5 run the same times and theres no way that's possible. and also there are only like 5 cars on the second list that are comparable to the 7 and they all have very similar times. its rediculous to compare a 1.3l to a 5.0 and even still it wasn't much slower!
|
Click the link you dolt. If you are too lazy, just admit i'm right
|
nice race man.
|
Originally Posted by R3AL.CH1CK3N
(Post 9194901)
nice race man.
It would have been a better race on my part if my aux ports were working and i had the cat removed. I also had a very slight hesitation around 4k but after cleaning some grounds today it went away. |
i have a N/A fc s4 with a K&N intake and apexi duals. raced a '08 civic Si. i lost but i wasnt smoked. i have hopes for my 7 :)
felix what grounds did u clean exactly cause im experiencing the hesitation also |
Civics Si's run low 15's IIRC. You did pretty decent to keep up.
|
Originally Posted by xxifearixx
(Post 9195749)
felix what grounds did u clean exactly cause im experiencing the hesitation also
Big thanks for Aaroncake of course. |
Originally Posted by jshiz
(Post 9194105)
The N/a FC only got 10 more hp than the GSL SE but got an added 300 lbs. The only thing the base FC has on a GSL SE is a better suspension.
My S5 NA used to be considerably faster than any first gen, including the GSL-SE (all of them on stock intake manifold\carbs and stock efi on teh GSL-SE). A popular mod to the 1st gen (back home) was a RB intake manifold, and carb. There was no contest when racing a properly modified 1st gen on my S5 NA, they would put the hurting on me, and it wasn't even funny :dunno: |
Originally Posted by FelixIsGod29X
(Post 9181247)
Can anyone confirm this for me? Sorry to put you on the spot but you did say "i guess".
Removing the 5&6th port sleeves, and BLOCKING the ports with JB weld would take tons and tons of that crap; besides, if the ports were in fact blocked, your engine would have a hard time reaching anything above 7K rpms (or so) |
Originally Posted by KNONFS
(Post 9201615)
Have you raced a NA FC?
My S5 NA used to be considerably faster than any first gen, including the GSL-SE (all of them on stock intake manifold\carbs and stock efi on teh GSL-SE). A popular mod to the 1st gen (back home) was a RB intake manifold, and carb. There was no contest when racing a properly modified 1st gen on my S5 NA, they would put the hurting on me, and it wasn't even funny :dunno: |
Originally Posted by KNONFS
(Post 9201623)
I am sure he is right...
Removing the 5&6th port sleeves, and BLOCKING the ports with JB weld would take tons and tons of that crap; besides, if the ports were in fact blocked, your engine would have a hard time reaching anything above 7K rpms (or so) |
Originally Posted by KNONFS
(Post 9201623)
I am sure he is right...
Removing the 5&6th port sleeves, and BLOCKING the ports with JB weld would take tons and tons of that crap; besides, if the ports were in fact blocked, your engine would have a hard time reaching anything above 7K rpms (or so) |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:51 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands