Race Techniques Talk about your Road Race, Time Trial, Autocross, Rally and Drag techniques in here

Single or twins for road course and autocross racing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 31, 2012 | 11:47 AM
  #1  
mgarlock's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
From: Cumming, GA
Single or twins for road course and autocross racing

I am sure this came up out there but a search found nothing. Still trying to figure out the search function.

Would like some input form actual track set ups. Want to know if I should plan for a single turbo or set up the twins non seq on my FD for track use. Have done a non seq. set up on previous FD and liked it. Have not driven a single turbo set up.

Any input is appreciated.
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2012 | 03:45 PM
  #2  
Robbie_B's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: Longmont, CO
I would got with the stock twins for road racing an autocross.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2013 | 11:43 PM
  #3  
bbreidhaupt's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
From: robinson, ky
twins. a single large turbo takes longer to spool up than two small chargers. and in most cases you can match those two small chargers to get the same output as the large single without having any lag.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2013 | 08:26 PM
  #4  
JR_85RX7's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: USA
I would run a single turbo set up. Here's why
Going single makes the engine bay less complex, you get rid of a whole lot of vaccum hoses. There are lots of good turbos that will spool nearly as fast the stock twins. Gt35r is one example. This turbo will make you power all the way to redline. The stocks twins are more prone to fail, especially the stocker that are atleast 10years old. I would personally go single, it more expensive this route, but you can have a reliable rotary.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2013 | 09:01 PM
  #5  
lOOkatme's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 11
From: Colorado Springs, CO
I own a single turbo set up and love it to death. But if I had functioning stock TT's that weren't blowing oil everywhere I would use those up till they are gone. Then I would switch to a single turbo.

Mine were blowing oil into the intercooler piping and I am up in the mountains so I opted to go the single turbo route.

I have a GT3574R which does very well. I think this turbo spools faster and better than my non-sequential TT set up and makes a lot more power.

It's also a lot more simple under the hood.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2013 | 09:02 PM
  #6  
Narfle's Avatar
Rx7 Wagon
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 7,008
Likes: 888
From: California
The twins arent great for the track due to their complex, fragile, hot nature. You'd do better with a tried and true single setup.

You don't have to go nuts. Get a cast manifold and a proven turbo. It will work every time.
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2013 | 02:58 AM
  #7  
Efinity's Avatar
Touge Legend
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,013
Likes: 5
From: CA
single. twins are fun, but they are problematic. theorycrafting is different then being broken down at the track.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2014 | 12:54 PM
  #8  
mitim3's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, CA
IMO I would think to go with the stock sequential setup. Although some singles (such as the GT35) have pretty good response, I still feel the stock turbos have exceptional response which would be really good especially for a tight nit course like an autocross. There are plenty of single setups that will produce good power compared to the stock twins but there are also different ways to create substantial power like upgrading the intake and exhaust, a higher performance intercooler setup. I agree the stock twins are very complex and are prone to failure, so the reliability aspect of a single can be a plus. I also think apart from spending money on adding power, why not decrease the weight of the car by removing stuff not necessary for auto-x? It's free!
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2014 | 12:18 PM
  #9  
Tem120's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,824
Likes: 6
From: Miami
small single for good spool , and less heat . small modern BB singles spool as quick as the twins with better torque /power quicker .
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2014 | 12:45 PM
  #10  
gracer7-rx7's Avatar
needs more track time
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,729
Likes: 784
From: Bay Area CA
Both work. It's a question of how well engineered your setup is. Single turbo setups often result in cracked manifolds (search Fritz Flynn's posts), fasteners that loosen quickly due to the heat cycles - search CrispyRX7's ? posts.

Never really had a problem with my sequential twins and track days. Once they work, they stay working.
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2014 | 01:20 AM
  #11  
GrossPolluter's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,075
Likes: 2
From: CA
I'm sure if you took the peak hp potential of the stock twins and got a twin entry ball bearing turbo that peaks the same, you would have better response with the single. twin entry is pretty much like twin turbos, but you just have to figure how big. Most people on the forum talk about 400hp+ single turbos, and journal bearing being the most affordable
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2014 | 07:37 PM
  #12  
briansfd's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 354
Likes: 46
From: Plano, TX
You need to know what kind of racing you're going to be doing. For me I'm planning on running TTB in NASA Time Trial races and upgrading anything will add points to my car and bump me out of my category.
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2015 | 02:44 AM
  #13  
RobertC's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
From: Houston, Texas
I have ran both sequential twins and a GT35R in an autocross setting. I would go with the Single personally. Granted, each has their advantages. The twins have a lot better transient response. I notice myself getting onto throttle with the single a few moments before I would have done with the twins in the same situation so I am on power at the exit of the corner. One thing that I have noticed being a downfall of the twins mainly on slick autocross courses, like Royal Purple Raceway here in Houston, is the transition can really throw your car out of line even going in a straight line. I have been in situations where the car decided to get very loose going straight. Overall, the response is very similar between a 35r and the twins and you will have a more consistent and linear power curve with the single. Much easier to control at all rpm ranges.

Going on the reliability part. I would regularly see the high 90s in autocross with the twins after runs, maybe low 100sC in water temps. Ever since I changed to the single turbo, I have never seen anything over 94C. Also much easier to work on with the single, very few vacuum lines. I have falling asleep writing this so I am going to get some shut eye and I'll finish this tomorrow.

Good luck in your research!
Robert
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2015 | 08:28 PM
  #14  
Rmagic's Avatar
1 Mo Gin
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 214
Likes: 14
From: DFW, TX
I know this is an old thread but what about the BNR stage 3's. My FD setup is to shoot for 350 - 375 rwhp with BNR's, plus water injection and a Power FC. Car will see track days, Auto X, and some trips up to DGRR and the Smoky Mtns. Going single has been gnawing at me though, especially considering this Florida heat.
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2015 | 10:08 PM
  #15  
eliminster's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
From: ft benning
IMO single with the Borgwarner efr 8374 iwg. Why do I say that simplicity, great transient response, and doesn't choke the exhaust side like the twins. Power side it is geared more towards the 25 psi range of boost so will want race fuel or e95 to get the best use out of it, and it will make a lot more torque than you are used to in a rotary. For autocross you may even think about the 7640 it spools just driving through the parking lot light load.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2015 | 06:35 PM
  #16  
Turblown's Avatar
Turn up the boost
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,174
Likes: 236
From: Twin Cities, MN
BorgWarner EFR IWG FD3S Turbo System
__________________
Rotary Performance Parts


Reply
Old Mar 30, 2015 | 09:18 AM
  #17  
rx7 SE's Avatar
Enthusiast
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,181
Likes: 1
From: Charlotte, NC
I agree with the majority here, a well engineered single should win 7/10 times vs seq turbos. The seq turbos are great for DDing, coming from a light etc. but anything after 3k rpms a good single like an efr should be just as good and even better as the rpms increase.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2015 | 10:07 AM
  #18  
evo_koa's Avatar
Martin S.
Tenured Member: 10 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,553
Likes: 123
From: Huntsville, Al
I have twins in my fd and I autox a lot, I have never had any issue at all. If you set it up right it with a proper intercooler etc, it will be a rock solid set up
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Skeese
Adaptronic Engine Mgmt - AUS
65
Mar 28, 2017 03:30 PM
4sfeedit
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
10
Aug 16, 2015 01:42 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:32 AM.