RX7Club.com - Mazda RX7 Forum

RX7Club.com - Mazda RX7 Forum (https://www.rx7club.com/)
-   New Member RX-7 Technical (https://www.rx7club.com/new-member-rx-7-technical-256/)
-   -   Which RX7 generation has the greatest potential (https://www.rx7club.com/new-member-rx-7-technical-256/rx7-generation-has-greatest-potential-990599/)

kabbie 03-27-12 07:06 PM

I am partial to FD as well but I can see a case for FC's

damusto 03-27-12 09:46 PM

thanks Guys...
...nice video Kentetsu, congratulates the results, and thanks for info(4k I mean)

RX7andI 03-28-12 01:14 AM

3rd gen, though, the FC is still pretty slick.

JDM user 03-29-12 01:31 PM

i think you'll be please with a 1st gen

damusto 03-29-12 04:05 PM

thanks but I still need more numbers

smal update:

SA/FB .....................................FC
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Engine: ................... 12A-1156cc .......................... 13B-1308cc ....................
Power: ..................... ~105 hp (6000)...................... ~ 148 hp (6500)...............
Torque: ..................... ~ 144 Nm (4000)................... ~ 182 Nm (3000)..............
durability: ................. +4000km .............................. (similarly) ......................
fuel consumption: ....... 15.2 l/100km .......................... 15.1 l/100km .................
------------------------------------------ weight distribution -------------------------------
Weight: .................... 1009 kg ................................ 1175 kg ......................
reduce ability: ........... 192,5 kg ................................ *** kg ........................
bhp/ton: ..................... 104 ....................................... 126 ..........................
Front/Rear: ................ 48.7/51.3% ................................ AA/BB% .......................
Left/Right: .................. 52.5/47.5% ................................ AA/BB% .......................
CGH : ........................ 455mm .................................. XXXmm ......................
-------------------------------------------- aerodynamics -----------------------------------
Cd : ........................... 0.36 ....................................... 0.31 .......................
Area: ......................... X.XXm2 .................................. X.XXm2 ......................
Cl(front): ........................ 0.XX ....................................... 0.XX ...........................
Cl(rear): ........................ 0.XX ....................................... 0.XX ...........................
-------------------------------------------- ugrade price -----------------------------------------
..................................... ~ 4000 $ .................................. XXXXX $ .......................

*weight distribution with full tank and (83,5 kg) driver

Verify all that please.

damusto 03-29-12 05:30 PM

smal update: (request to the moderator to remove the previous post)

SA/FB .....................................FC
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Engine: ................... 12A-1156cc .......................... 13B-1308cc ....................
Power: ..................... ~105 hp (6000)...................... ~ 148 hp (6500)...............
Torque: ..................... ~ 144 Nm (4000)................... ~ 182 Nm (3000)..............
durability: ................. +4000km .............................. (similarly) ......................
fuel consumption: ....... 15.2 l/100km .......................... 15.1 l/100km .................
------------------------------------------ weight distribution -------------------------------
Weight: .................... 1009 kg ................................ 1175 kg ......................
Front/Rear: ................ 48.7/51.3% ................................ AA/BB% .......................
Left/Right: .................. 52.5/47.5% ................................ AA/BB% .......................
bhp/ton: ..................... 104 ....................................... 126 ..........................
reduce ability: ........... 192,5 kg ................................ *** kg ........................
(RW)bhp/ton: ............... 128.6 ....................................... *** ..........................
CGH : ........................ 455mm .................................. XXXmm ......................
-------------------------------------------- aerodynamics -----------------------------------
Cd : ................. (sa)0.36 /(fb)0.32 ............................. 0.31 (0.29).......................
lights up : .................. 0.38 / 0.34 .....................................*.** ...........................
Area: ....................... 1.8Xm2 ....................................... 1.81 m2 ........................
Cl(front): .................... 0.18 / 0.12 .................................. 0.08 (0.08) ..........................
Cl(rear): ..................... 0.XX / 0.XX .................................. 0.14 (0.07) ..........................
-------------------------------------------- ugrade price -----------------------------------------
..................................... ~ 4000 $ .................................. XXXXX $ .......................

*weight distribution with full tank and (83,5 kg) driver

Verify all that please.

PS
this impossibility of editing posts is very cumbersome, maybe it should be apply only to the distribute transactions sections ?

Richdip 03-29-12 06:14 PM

s4 (; lightest

damusto 03-31-12 09:35 AM

I doubt that S4 was lighter Richdip, I browsed a lot of papers before I entered this value.
However thats only papers, I found a number of inaccuracies in them to be honest.
So my question is did You weigh your car ? Maybe You can give more accurate mass balance too ?
It would be very helpful if You might have a bit of free time to check this out.

Anyway its puzzling, I have few road tests from old magazines (Im writing about 1st gen. this time) and in all them mass balance is different, whats more inverse than proven by the user.

So help me please are we talking about F/R: 48.7/51.3% or 51.3/48.7% ? I am lost in this...

damusto 04-06-12 02:20 PM

another update

SA/FB .....................................FC
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Engine: ................... 12A-1156cc .......................... 13B-1308cc ....................
Power: ..................... ~105 hp (6000)...................... ~ 148 hp (6500)...............
Torque: ..................... ~ 144 Nm (4000)................... ~ 182 Nm (3000)..............
durability: ................. ****** km .............................. 50k-175k km ................
in race : .................... +4000 km .............................. ***** km ......................
fuel consumption: ....... 15.2 l/100km .......................... 15.1 l/100km .................
------------------------------------------ weight distribution -------------------------------
Weight: .................... 1009 kg ................................ 1175 kg ......................
Front/Rear: ................ 48.7/51.3% ................................ AA/BB% .......................
Left/Right: .................. 52.5/47.5% ................................ AA/BB% .......................
bhp/ton: ..................... 104 ....................................... 126 ..........................
reduce ability: ........... 192,5 kg ................................ *** kg ........................
(RW)bhp/ton: ............... 128.6 ....................................... *** ..........................
CGH : ........................ 455mm .................................. XXXmm ......................
-------------------------------------------- aerodynamics -----------------------------------
Cd : ................. (sa)0.36 /(fb)0.32 ............................. 0.31 (0.29).......................
lights up : .................. 0.38 / 0.34 .....................................*.** ...........................
Area: ....................... 1.8Xm2 ....................................... 1.81 m2 ........................
Cl(front): .................... 0.18 / 0.12 .................................. 0.08 (0.08) ..........................
Cl(rear): ..................... 0.XX / 0.XX .................................. 0.14 (0.07) ..........................
-------------------------------------------- ugrade price -----------------------------------------
..................................... ~ 4000 $ .................................. XXXXX $ .......................
-------------------------------------- additional Information -----------------------------------
..................................... none .................................. no FIA approval ..................

*weight distribution with full tank and (83,5 kg) driver

adialup78 04-08-12 03:21 PM

Fc's!fc

azstyles 04-26-12 10:13 AM

fc will the least amount of $

azstyles 04-26-12 10:40 AM

the fd3s

azstyles 04-26-12 10:41 AM

i hv a 94 going single turbo


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:20 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands