motors
 

Which motor is better 13b 20b or rennises or v8 (yuck)

Is this a serious question?

Lol

Yes.

V12's they are the best.

V12s are okay. And yes it's a serious question if u don't want a part a part of it unsubscribe

F119-PW-100- turbo

Okay Sean dizzle you're the winner lol

Hamsters are better than ducks. Ducks are better than goats. But some types of goats are better than Hamsters. How does that work?

Original HD- Whats the application. Your question is vauge and the answers will be based more around opinion.

I am glad I won. Yay!!!!

I know it's supposed to be opinion u say what motor you like best

Your random opinion poll (to build up post counts) does not belong in the tech support section....

I know i didn't have the post count for the lounge. So fuss at guys who DO have the post count. Have a nice day:)

And it's not to build up post count

either way it's still a vague question.

long block engines can't put out as much power without twisting. 12A>13B>20B
high compression engines are limited in power capability, ie boost limited. 13B-MSP renesis< anything above 275 crank horsepower
V8's cannot rev as high or freely as a rotary engine but they have a much more flat torque curve to make power all around. 13B <+/-> V8
turbo V8 owns a rotary hands down, 13B lovers can whine and moan all they want. turbo V8>>>>>13B

difference is a 13B does not equal V8 displacement, though it does equal modern V8 engine weight.


that is all

How can it be unclear you post what your favorite motor is only Seandizze has been able to do that and his was a jet

because the rotary is a spirit killer engine, even the most hardcore of us have a hard time defending these pieces of shit sometimes. but only a few who have totally disowned the rotary will admit that a V8 is a better alternative, in some ways it is, in others it isn't. if the 20B was more readily available you'd hear less whining, more swaps and more n/a conversions making decent reliable figures(at the cost of fuel consumption where the V8s would still rule over the rotary).

my favorite would be a 90* phased 4 rotor, fuck V8s because they will never make you squirm at a sound like that.

Okay i agree with that statement

The rotary is just so far behind the piston engine in technology and R&D over the past 100 years it really isn't a fair comparison. Even if it did have the same development as the piston engine there were be only a few places where the rotary would be better. If you are only concerned about a smooth long liniar power delivery and a engine that is very compact for it's power potential then the rotary is the way to go. Once you starting being concerned with MPG, reliablity, torque, cost of parts, then there really isn't a comparison.

The rotary delivers a driving experience that is much more in tune with performance driving. For me it is about the driving experience. Blazing accelleration? nah. Huge power numbers? 120 whp :P Perfect balance and a engine that loves to rev, YES.

Mazda needs to put a next gen 13b in the miata chassis and keep it under 2600 lbs. a 16X isn't needed. 240-250 hp would be more than enough. Take it back the the FB roots. Strip it down, keep it cheap and light. The RX8 was successful but a failure at the same time. Do what Toyota did with the GT86 but even more bare bones.

You're answer is best...for now

I just saw a Miata today with what sounded like a bridge ported 13b