3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Thoughts on hot air vs cold air intakes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 14, 2006 | 10:21 AM
  #1  
DamonB's Avatar
Thread Starter
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,617
Likes: 8
From: Dallas
Thoughts on hot air vs cold air intakes

Hot air vs cold air intakes seems to always be argumentative. I think everyone will agree that cold air is better, it just comes down to how much better and some feel it's not worth it. The hot air guys seem to think that as long as you have a decent intercooler it doesn't matter. I think they're full of hot air

All of us notice the difference in power of our turbo cars between a cool summer night and a hot summer afternoon and that difference is soley due to intake temps! If the difference in intake temps didn't matter you wouldn't notice a change in power. Anyone running a hot air intake is not making the power they should be. End of story.
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2006 | 10:33 AM
  #2  
airborne's Avatar
King of the Duct Tape
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,177
Likes: 0
From: PA
I have the pettit hot air intake and it sucks and blows. I also have the ASP large IC and while cruising on the highway in 70f weather my intake temp on the PFC was 105f. Thats with hardly any boost.

A while back I used a temp gauge with a remote sensor to see what the temps were like around those filters and its terrible. As soon as you come to a stop the air just bakes. Easily double ambient. It cools when you get moving, but slowly. My intake temps on 80+ days are at least 120+. Worst $/benefit ratio of any mod I've done. The extra $50-$100 for a box seems well worth it.
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2006 | 10:34 AM
  #3  
jd to rescue's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 542
Likes: 1
From: scottsdale, az
I absolutely agree. But, the theory goes that, the only time it makes any difference is when the engine is running while the vehicle is at a stand still--e.g., at a traffic light. At all other times, air is flowing through the front of the vehicle and is essentially allowing cool air to enter the intake. I just think 'why make the engine suffer at stops while making it suck in hot engine bay air?'
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2006 | 10:50 AM
  #4  
DaveW's Avatar
Racecar - Formula 2000
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,034
Likes: 370
From: Bath, OH
Originally Posted by DamonB
All of us notice the difference in power of our turbo cars between a cool summer night and a hot summer afternoon and that difference is soley due to intake temps! If the difference in intake temps didn't matter you wouldn't notice a change in power. Anyone running a hot air intake is not making the power they should be. End of story.
Although I basically agree with what you said, there IS another factor:

The ability of the IC to cool the air after the turbos compress it. That is also directly related to the temperature of the air passing through it, and may have an even bigger effect than the intake air temperature.

BTW, I run a cold air intake, and a larger IC - see my sig.
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2006 | 11:01 AM
  #5  
matty's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,014
Likes: 40
From: CT
having a cooler "starting" temp is a no brainer.
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2006 | 12:00 PM
  #6  
adam c's Avatar
Cheap Bastard
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,368
Likes: 50
From: San Luis Obispo, Ca
Wow, a new topic!!! Just kidding Damon

I agree. Even while driving at highway speeds, a "hot air intake" wil be sucking hot air that comes off the engine, intercooler, and radiator. That can easily be 50 degrees hotter than ambient. At a stop, air intake temps can be 150+ over ambient.
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2006 | 12:03 PM
  #7  
recon fd's Avatar
semper Fi
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,478
Likes: 1
From: LA
Well, I do have a "hot air" blitz intake, but I was going to try and fabricate a cool air box just to see what happens. Has anyone tried this before and have any pointer for me?

thanks,
-josh
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2006 | 12:19 PM
  #8  
DamonB's Avatar
Thread Starter
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,617
Likes: 8
From: Dallas
Originally Posted by jd to rescue
I absolutely agree. But, the theory goes that, the only time it makes any difference is when the engine is running while the vehicle is at a stand still--e.g., at a traffic light. At all other times, air is flowing through the front of the vehicle and is essentially allowing cool air to enter the intake.
If that were true I could drive down the highway for hours and immediately pull over, pop the hood and find that the air around a hot air intake under the hood is no warmer than the air outside the car. Wrong!
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2006 | 12:32 PM
  #9  
jd to rescue's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 542
Likes: 1
From: scottsdale, az
Originally Posted by DamonB
If that were true I could drive down the highway for hours and immediately pull over, pop the hood and find that the air around a hot air intake under the hood is no warmer than the air outside the car. Wrong!
Well you'd need to be pretty fast, because our little cookers heat the engine bay asap.

Seriously, I cannot argue with you. I have a cold air intake setup and I see it no other way. Traffic these days keeps you idling at lights too many minutes on any trip or commute. Maybe someone can rig up a digital thermometer in the intake to measure intake temps and we'll all know.
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2006 | 12:39 PM
  #10  
rynberg's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 10
From: San Lorenzo, California
Guys, intake temps were measured YEARS ago! http://www.fd3s.net/intake.html#COM

The M2 intake listed was the metal one, not the C/F one. As you can see, even the M2 is much hotter than the stock intake, but much cooler than an open intake. This is why I think the PFS intake is actually the best intake available, it's unfortunate it has to steal from the IC duct to get it's air. And it also makes working on the car a PITA, which is why I run an rx7fashion box now.

Bottom line, IMO, running an open intake is a bad move. There is no reason to, as the box intakes get plenty of air and run much cooler.
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2006 | 12:59 PM
  #11  
jpandes's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,236
Likes: 1
From: San Francisco, CA
Originally Posted by airborne
I have the pettit hot air intake and it sucks and blows. I also have the ASP large IC and while cruising on the highway in 70f weather my intake temp on the PFC was 105f. Thats with hardly any boost.

A while back I used a temp gauge with a remote sensor to see what the temps were like around those filters and its terrible. As soon as you come to a stop the air just bakes. Easily double ambient. It cools when you get moving, but slowly. My intake temps on 80+ days are at least 120+. Worst $/benefit ratio of any mod I've done. The extra $50-$100 for a box seems well worth it.
I have a similar set us as you: Large M2/ASP SMIC and with 2 4" K&N filters. I also added 3" ducting to channel cold air from the nose up through the gap between the frame rail and the raditator to them along with a home made heat sheild. It sucks hot air from the engine bay into the engine while at a stop.

Does anyone know if an M2 or PFS "enlcosed" intake box will fit with an ASP/M2 Large SMIC?
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2006 | 01:00 PM
  #12  
DamonB's Avatar
Thread Starter
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,617
Likes: 8
From: Dallas
Originally Posted by rynberg
Guys, intake temps were measured YEARS ago!
I don't think anyone argues that there IS a difference in intake temps, but the hot air guys often insist that these differences don't matter because they happen to have a "big" intercooler. Rubbish.
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2006 | 01:13 PM
  #13  
Whizbang's Avatar
Respecognize!
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,106
Likes: 72
From: Anchor Bay, CA
start lower. end lower. physics owns you.
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2006 | 01:17 PM
  #14  
DaveW's Avatar
Racecar - Formula 2000
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,034
Likes: 370
From: Bath, OH
Originally Posted by DamonB
I don't think anyone argues that there IS a difference in intake temps, but the hot air guys often insist that these differences don't matter because they happen to have a "big" intercooler. Rubbish.
Agreed. Cooler, denser air to the turbos means more efficient (more rapid output rise to controller limit, more output-pressure capability, etc.) turbo operation.

Period.
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2006 | 01:40 PM
  #15  
jayk's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 587
Likes: 0
From: DC
Originally Posted by DamonB
Hot air vs cold air intakes seems to always be argumentative. I think everyone will agree that cold air is better, it just comes down to how much better and some feel it's not worth it. The hot air guys seem to think that as long as you have a decent intercooler it doesn't matter. I think they're full of hot air

All of us notice the difference in power of our turbo cars between a cool summer night and a hot summer afternoon and that difference is soley due to intake temps! If the difference in intake temps didn't matter you wouldn't notice a change in power. Anyone running a hot air intake is not making the power they should be. End of story.

Won't the IC work more effectively also given cooler ambient air? Meaning that, yes, the cool night air is providing colder intake temps, but I would also expect that the IC is cooling the post turbo air more than it would on a hot day. Plus everything along the path (intake manifold, engine, exhaust, turbos) is going to get better cooling given cold ambient temps.

I'm not speaking to the hot air vs. cold air debate, but I would make an uneducated guess that the difference is probably not soley due to intake temps.
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2006 | 01:54 PM
  #16  
jayk's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 587
Likes: 0
From: DC
Originally Posted by jayk
Won't the IC work more effectively also given cooler ambient air? Meaning that, yes, the cool night air is providing colder intake temps, but I would also expect that the IC is cooling the post turbo air more than it would on a hot day. Plus everything along the path (intake manifold, engine, exhaust, turbos) is going to get better cooling given cold ambient temps.

I'm not speaking to the hot air vs. cold air debate, but I would make an uneducated guess that the difference is probably not soley due to intake temps.

By intake temps I mean pre-air filter...
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2006 | 02:55 PM
  #18  
poss's Avatar
Slower Traffic Keep Right
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,194
Likes: 2
From: Dayton, OH
Originally Posted by DaveW
Agreed. Cooler, denser air to the turbos means more efficient (more rapid output rise to controller limit, more output-pressure capability, etc.) turbo operation.

Period.
I've said this many times on this forum, yet people still want to argue with me saying that a big intercooler is just as good!
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2006 | 03:02 PM
  #19  
rynberg's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 10
From: San Lorenzo, California
Originally Posted by DamonB
I don't think anyone argues that there IS a difference in intake temps, but the hot air guys often insist that these differences don't matter because they happen to have a "big" intercooler. Rubbish.
Good point....and I fully agree with you, of course.
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2006 | 03:03 PM
  #20  
coolvette's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 836
Likes: 0
From: Daytona Beach FL
yes,there is a way to get cooler air. someone on this forum runs piping thru/under sleek headlight unit, right to the duct for oil cooler.I bet it lower the temps quite a bit.
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2006 | 03:04 PM
  #21  
rynberg's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 10
From: San Lorenzo, California
Originally Posted by jpandes
Does anyone know if an M2 or PFS "enlcosed" intake box will fit with an ASP/M2 Large SMIC?
The old metal M2 or rx7fashion box will....John, give Rick a call. He's running the rx7fashion box with an ASP large now. He is still running the PC680 on the side of the IC.

The PFS should work but it would need to be modified quite a bit.....

Last edited by rynberg; Jun 14, 2006 at 03:08 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2006 | 03:19 PM
  #22  
Nuvolari's Avatar
Veni, Vidi, Vici
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,253
Likes: 1
From: Metro DC
Quote :'the PFS intake is actually the best intake available"

You must be on crack, its a horrible unit. One its seriously old technology, second its so restrictive and it just cooks the air. I called it the the PFS hot box.

I have a single turbo with no air box just a K&N filter. My air intake temps are 15c lower then when I ran the PFS equipment.

When my Fd is running the intake pipes on the turbo side are very hot, but on the other side going to the TB its cool to touch. Guess my FMIC works

Last edited by Nuvolari; Jun 14, 2006 at 03:25 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2006 | 03:38 PM
  #23  
John Magnuson's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,147
Likes: 1
From: San Diego, CA
I have the carbon fiber M2 air box. I wonder if it's better than the old metal one. I'd assume the carbon fiber does not asorb and radiate heat as much as the metal box would?
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2006 | 04:00 PM
  #24  
sonix7's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,766
Likes: 1
From: ft. collins, colorado
Here is some info on Carbon Fiber for you guys!

http://www.everything2.com/index.pl?node=carbon%20fiber

Here are some pipe guards for motorcycles. I would say that the heat protection properties of Carbon Fiber would be substantial.

http://www.motoworldracing.com/wb-06...pe-guards.html

In this link K&N talks about the heat resistance in paragraph 2.

http://www.knfilters.com/Racing/crbnfiber.htm

It is the resin that is laminating the Carbon Fiber fabric that is the weak link for heat. Now a days we have vinylester resin, a cross between polyester and epoxy resins. It is formulated to be extremely heat and chemical resistant. Maybe I need to make a duct that comes from the front bumper straight to the intakes and with a good heatshield for the intake, you should get much improved air flow and intake temps. Also what do you guys think a vented hood would do to change the equation?
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2006 | 04:35 PM
  #25  
F0RSAKEN's Avatar
Cheese
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
From: Lynnwood, WA
I think (imo) the best intake ever made for the FD was the one that was hand made of welded pieces of titanium piping that went down to the corner vent in the front bumper, where the oil cooler in the R1 resides. I cannot for the life of me remember who made that, I havent seen him post in months, and I cant find the thread w/ Search.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:42 AM.