2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

What about the airbox is restrictive?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 22, 2003 | 02:34 PM
  #1  
Fingers's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,788
Likes: 0
From: Ottawa, Ontario
What about the airbox is restrictive?

Specifically what is restrictive? I have to keep the stock airbox for emissions/insurance inspection purposes.

Thanks
-Ross
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2003 | 02:41 PM
  #2  
Black13B's Avatar
In Full Autist Cosplay
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,330
Likes: 0
From: Alberta
Stock airbox?

I think you could construct your own and it would still be legitimate wouldn't it?
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2003 | 02:50 PM
  #3  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
Like most stock airboxes, it's the shape of the inlet and outlet. Anytime you dramatically change direction or cross-sectional area you create turbulence. Good airboxes have bellmouths to minimise this and you can add these to some airboxes with a little work, but the shape of the FC airbox makes this almost impossible to do

Don't bother with aftermarket panel filters unless you're looking for long-term dollar savings. Replacing the element with a K&N or whatever will give you no measureable performance gains, because the stock filter is not a restriction.
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2003 | 05:27 PM
  #4  
Batguano's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
From: The Cave North Carolina USA
For what it's worth, I installed a K&N filter and cut the top out of my box. Left the edges to hold the filter. It seemed to increase performance and sounds good too.
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2003 | 07:37 PM
  #5  
Icemark's Avatar
Former Moderator. RIP Icemark.
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 25,896
Likes: 24
From: Rohnert Park CA
The ribs inside and guide duct is the biggest restriction to the stock box.

If you are going to keep the stock box, make these mods for increased HP and Torque:




Ideally you would want to remove all the ribs and the duct, but making those cuts will provide you with a good proven compromise (based on RB air box work in the late 80's).

BTW, cutting the lid off/open is a bad idea and lets too much hot air in. Minimal extra holes on the cold air side are what is needed.
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2003 | 08:00 PM
  #6  
MtnRacer's Avatar
infini guru
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,183
Likes: 0
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Awesome pics mark. I'm going to keep my stock airbox too, but only because I like the stock look of the engine bay. I was planning on cutting out part of the bottom to make room for a cone filter. This airbox cutting idea looks interesting too though! I might try it. I wanted to clarify though, which side in the cold air side? The side that already has holes drilled in the picture? Thanks!

Steve
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2003 | 08:02 PM
  #7  
Icemark's Avatar
Former Moderator. RIP Icemark.
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 25,896
Likes: 24
From: Rohnert Park CA
Yeah I call the cold side of the box, where I (and RB used too also) drill the holes that are close to the head light and fender- rather than the hot side which is closer to the rad and engine.

Its pretty surprising the difference of flow with just those minor holes drilled. instead of the cold side building up all the dirt (as in the stock design), it is much more evenly distributed through the filter panel.

Last edited by Icemark; Nov 22, 2003 at 08:06 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2003 | 10:49 PM
  #8  
Batguano's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
From: The Cave North Carolina USA
Hey Icemark. Looks like your idea is better than mine. I kept my original box. Think I'll convert the same way.
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2003 | 11:40 PM
  #9  
jinx22630's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 328
Likes: 0
From: Front Royal, Virginia
Hey IceMark, have you had any experience with removing the airbox in favor of a cone filter, but leaving the fresh air intake duct, with an extention to direct cooler air to the filter?
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2003 | 11:48 PM
  #10  
Icemark's Avatar
Former Moderator. RIP Icemark.
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 25,896
Likes: 24
From: Rohnert Park CA
Originally posted by jinx22630
Hey IceMark, have you had any experience with removing the airbox in favor of a cone filter, but leaving the fresh air intake duct, with an extention to direct cooler air to the filter?
I use a K&N cone filter with factory fresh air duct and cool air box right now.

The drilled air box above I use at emissions testing time.
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2003 | 02:44 AM
  #11  
bighead's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 406
Likes: 0
From: Markham
Icemark... if I did this to my airbox, would that increase the fuel consumption? Does letting more and colder air increase fuel consumption?

I'd do this... but not if it increases fuel costs...
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2003 | 10:54 AM
  #12  
WTF
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 752
Likes: 0
From: Tennessee
id like to know that also...my mileage is bad enough as it is
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2003 | 11:01 AM
  #13  
Icemark's Avatar
Former Moderator. RIP Icemark.
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 25,896
Likes: 24
From: Rohnert Park CA
I have seen no increase in fuel consumption.

other than putting your foot into it a little more from a minor seat of the pants HP increase, and a slight audible increase.
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2003 | 11:41 AM
  #14  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,833
Likes: 3,232
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally posted by Icemark
Yeah I call the cold side of the box, where I (and RB used too also) drill the holes that are close to the head light and fender- rather than the hot side which is closer to the rad and engine.

Its pretty surprising the difference of flow with just those minor holes drilled. instead of the cold side building up all the dirt (as in the stock design), it is much more evenly distributed through the filter panel.
yah i did that mod way back in the day, its amazing you can actually feel the difference

mike
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2003 | 12:44 PM
  #15  
jpd3253's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
From: Tampa Bay
Why holes on the interior portion of the inlet duct, as opposed to removing it completely?

JDP
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2003 | 12:46 PM
  #16  
Fingers's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,788
Likes: 0
From: Ottawa, Ontario
Originally posted by jpd3253
Why holes on the interior portion of the inlet duct, as opposed to removing it completely?

JDP
If you take the lid off, or the whole box off, you'll be sucking in hot air from the engine bay. The best bet is to cut holes in the front of the box and remove the rubber trim right behind the headlight.
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2003 | 12:48 PM
  #17  
Icemark's Avatar
Former Moderator. RIP Icemark.
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 25,896
Likes: 24
From: Rohnert Park CA
Originally posted by jpd3253
Why holes on the interior portion of the inlet duct, as opposed to removing it completely?

JDP
Probably would be better to remove the duct for reduced turbulence, but leaving part of it does force the air to flow over the entire filter, rather than straight in and down.
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2003 | 12:49 PM
  #18  
Fingers's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,788
Likes: 0
From: Ottawa, Ontario
Correct me if i'm wrong, but isnt turbulence before the air filter better? It will dissipate the airflow over the entire filter area, instead of a single concentrated spot.
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2003 | 12:54 PM
  #19  
Icemark's Avatar
Former Moderator. RIP Icemark.
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 25,896
Likes: 24
From: Rohnert Park CA
There are two unproven thoughts on that.

One, is that the smoothest air flow in, no matter what is better.

The other is mixed stream turbulence is better before the AFM, but smooth stream after.

The holes drilled work on the 2nd idea.
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2003 | 05:50 PM
  #20  
bighead's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 406
Likes: 0
From: Markham
Cool... I am gonna do it! But... how did you cut those oval holes?!
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2003 | 06:06 PM
  #21  
Rotorific's Avatar
I dont know a damn thing
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,703
Likes: 1
From: Evans, Ga
Would you really need to keep the tunnel thing? into the air box or just cut it completely off?
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2003 | 07:03 PM
  #22  
Icemark's Avatar
Former Moderator. RIP Icemark.
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 25,896
Likes: 24
From: Rohnert Park CA
Originally posted by bighead
Cool... I am gonna do it! But... how did you cut those oval holes?!
with a 1"x2" oval hole saw.








Just kidding there is no such thing as a oval hole saw.

anyway, I just cut two holes, one on each side of the rib, and then filed it down between them.
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2003 | 11:40 PM
  #23  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
Originally posted by jinx22630
...have you had any experience with removing the airbox in favor of a cone filter, but leaving the fresh air intake duct, with an extention to direct cooler air to the filter?
This will have little if any effect. The stock snorkel needs to be connected to a sealed airbox to draw any air in. Air won't be pushed through it to a pod filter.
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2003 | 12:09 AM
  #24  
bighead's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 406
Likes: 0
From: Markham
Originally posted by Icemark
with a 1"x2" oval hole saw.
That's great! I already HAVE an oval saw. Thanks!
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2003 | 12:22 AM
  #25  
jinx22630's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 328
Likes: 0
From: Front Royal, Virginia
Originally posted by NZConvertible
This will have little if any effect. The stock snorkel needs to be connected to a sealed airbox to draw any air in. Air won't be pushed through it to a pod filter.

Well I'll be damned. Is there anything you don't know?
You know, I didn't really think about it like that, I just have a cone filter, but i still have the fresh air snorkel in place. I guess it can't really hurt anything, so I'm just gonna leave it there.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:42 AM.