2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

Counterweights & Flywheels

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 12, 2003 | 01:23 AM
  #1  
Ni5mo180SX's Avatar
Thread Starter
White Comet
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,145
Likes: 0
From: Orange County
Question Counterweights & Flywheels

Well, I know this topic has been covered a few times and I have searched but the answers appeared to be somewhat inconclusive.

First the scenerio: I have a 87NA engine and driveline (MT). The engine I have is a 88 T2 auto. Ive been preparing for the swap for almost 6 weeks now, and with the day of the swap just next sunday the idea of the flywheel and counterweight reoccured. I've also spoken to a few different people and recieved as what I interpreted to be different messages.

I've heard that flywheels within series are interchangable but the counterweights are different. At this point, I dont think I can use the stock NA flywheel. I believe I have to use a aftermarket NA flywheel and use the auto T2 counterweights or something of that sort? Id appreciate some help, esp those who have done the swap themselves. Thanks in advance.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2003 | 01:35 AM
  #2  
Icemark's Avatar
Former Moderator. RIP Icemark.
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 25,896
Likes: 24
From: Rohnert Park CA
You are using the NA tranny right?, then yes use a aftermarket NA flywheel and the T2 counterweight.

BTW: I heard you can order just the flywheel from Mazdatrix or RB and save quite a bit of money since you already have the counter weight. You'll have to call them though.

Last edited by Icemark; Apr 12, 2003 at 01:51 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2003 | 01:46 AM
  #3  
nillahcaz's Avatar
you are missed
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 987
Likes: 1
From: St. Louis
Re: Counterweights & Flywheels

what do you mean by
Originally posted by Ni5mo180SX
auto T2 counterweights
?
there was not a turbo TII auto tranny.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2003 | 01:50 AM
  #4  
Icemark's Avatar
Former Moderator. RIP Icemark.
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 25,896
Likes: 24
From: Rohnert Park CA
Re: Re: Counterweights & Flywheels

Originally posted by nillahcaz
what do you mean by
?
there was not a turbo TII auto tranny.
there was in Japan, AUS, NZ, and Europe
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2003 | 01:55 AM
  #5  
Ni5mo180SX's Avatar
Thread Starter
White Comet
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,145
Likes: 0
From: Orange County
Originally posted by Icemark
You are using the NA tranny right?, then yes use a aftermarket NA flywheel and the T2 counterweight.

BTW: I heard you can order just the flywheel from Mazdatrix or RB and save quite a bit of money since you already have the counter weight. You'll have to call them though.
Thanks for clearing that up

Yup, thats the NA tranny im still using. Auto on the T2 engine because its a jspec.
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2003 | 10:47 PM
  #6  
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 145
Likes: 2
From: Irvine, California
since the rotors are the same weight between NA and Turbo why cant u use the stock flywheel from the 87 NA?
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2003 | 12:17 PM
  #7  
Ni5mo180SX's Avatar
Thread Starter
White Comet
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,145
Likes: 0
From: Orange County
^
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2003 | 12:47 PM
  #8  
pillage6's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,060
Likes: 2
From: Jax, FL
You can use the same flywheel, but the counterweight has to match the rotating assembly, which in this case is a Turbo 2 motor.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2003 | 03:34 PM
  #9  
Ni5mo180SX's Avatar
Thread Starter
White Comet
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,145
Likes: 0
From: Orange County
But wouldnt that cause problems being that the S4 NA flywheel is stock and has its own counterweight built in?
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2003 | 03:50 PM
  #10  
Cosmo Donk's Avatar
Queer
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 742
Likes: 0
From: Formerly in the Ass end of the pacific.
You know, I have been trying to figure this out for a while and it always seems to be confusing but I think I figured it out

They need to match I know it sounds dumb but I had this problem with my Cosmo motor. Basically you want the front to match the rear so...

Cosmo auto rear and cosmo front = ok with light flywheel

89NA auto rear with 89NA front = ok with light flywheel

88T2 auto rear with 88T2 front = ok with light flywheel

So you can't use the stock NA flywheel with your auto engine because the weights are wrong.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2003 | 04:07 PM
  #11  
Rob500's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
From: Long Beach, CA, USA
The stock flywheels have the counterweight built into them. If you are going to put a t2 motor in the car you will need one of two things. Either the stock t2 flywheel for the year of the motor OR a lightweight flywheel and the automatic counter weight that matches the year of the motor. The flywheel has to match the motor.

Rob
Reply
Old May 4, 2003 | 04:16 AM
  #12  
Ni5mo180SX's Avatar
Thread Starter
White Comet
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,145
Likes: 0
From: Orange County
If the rotors are weighted them same for S4 T2 and NA, then why would the counterweights between them be different? What would keep me from using my stock NA flywheel on the T2 motor?
Reply
Old May 4, 2003 | 12:44 PM
  #13  
HAILERS's Avatar
HAILERS
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 20,563
Likes: 27
From: FORT WORTH, TEXAS,USA
http://www.mazdatrix.com/b5.htm
Reply
Old May 4, 2003 | 01:16 PM
  #14  
Ni5mo180SX's Avatar
Thread Starter
White Comet
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,145
Likes: 0
From: Orange County
Checked it out and it pointed out the front counter weights are the same for turbo and NA........
Reply
Old May 5, 2003 | 01:39 AM
  #15  
Ni5mo180SX's Avatar
Thread Starter
White Comet
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,145
Likes: 0
From: Orange County
^
Reply
Old May 5, 2003 | 01:14 PM
  #16  
Ni5mo180SX's Avatar
Thread Starter
White Comet
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,145
Likes: 0
From: Orange County
^
Reply
Old May 5, 2003 | 01:33 PM
  #17  
HAILERS's Avatar
HAILERS
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 20,563
Likes: 27
From: FORT WORTH, TEXAS,USA
I have this site on my hard drive.... http://www.mazdaformance.com/rx7parts.htm

and I double checked and sure enough the front counterweights are the same on a turbo as a N/T.
Part number N326-11-061A.

I DID NOT look up the weight for the flywheel. More or less figured if the front are the same, then the rear are the same. That was for a 86-88 model. One has to look for himself for different models. See page 1-I3 and 1-J3 of the 86-88 Engine.

BUMP TO THE TOP!
Reply
Old May 5, 2003 | 08:09 PM
  #18  
Ni5mo180SX's Avatar
Thread Starter
White Comet
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,145
Likes: 0
From: Orange County
odd.................

Anyone thats done this wanna chime in??
Reply
Old May 5, 2003 | 10:11 PM
  #19  
Trav's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,273
Likes: 0
From: Kansas
blah, just spring for the RB alum. flywheel. I just bought mine, fact it should be in transit right now. $370 or something w/o the counterweight + a few bucks for the hardware. All told, should be right at $400 or less if you don't need the counterweight. I'm going to pet mine for a few hours after it arrives. Such a shame to put that beautiful peice where it can't be seen.
Reply
Old May 5, 2003 | 10:14 PM
  #20  
chrismckinless's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 174
Likes: 1
From: Arlington, VA
I think you can use your NA flywheel, Mazdatrix only offers one rear counterweight for S4's, it must mean the weighting of the rotors is the same, even thought the weight is different. You are using your NA tranny also correct?

Sell me the counterweight. Ill give you $50 shipped for it.

Chris
Reply
Old May 5, 2003 | 10:22 PM
  #21  
Ni5mo180SX's Avatar
Thread Starter
White Comet
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,145
Likes: 0
From: Orange County
Well since im still in the process of doing this engine swap, I dont wanna spend money needlessly, esp. if the NA driveline wont last. $310 is a lot of money saved to put towards something else if theres a problem with this swap.
Reply
Old May 5, 2003 | 10:42 PM
  #22  
Trav's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,273
Likes: 0
From: Kansas
Conflicting reports on strength of NA driveline. Will definitely blow the clutch quickly, so upgrade that. But have heard of quite a few guys running pretty decent HP numbers and have not killed their NA tranny yet -- I hope to add my name to that list. If you're staying near stock on the T2 motor, I think you'll be fine.

Besides, I don't think you'd have any trouble selling a lightweight flywheel around here if you did have to upgrade eventually. Not my decision and definitely not my money, but this is what I'd recommend.
Reply
Old May 5, 2003 | 10:47 PM
  #23  
Ni5mo180SX's Avatar
Thread Starter
White Comet
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,145
Likes: 0
From: Orange County
Yea, I would like to find out on my own how long it'll last but would probably rather hang on to the cash for now as I dont think power is going to be an issue with the setup. I do have a brand new RB HD clutch and PP with all bearings ready to go.

Has ANYONE used their NA flywheel on the NA driveline for a T2 motor?
Reply
Old May 6, 2003 | 01:26 AM
  #24  
Ni5mo180SX's Avatar
Thread Starter
White Comet
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,145
Likes: 0
From: Orange County
^up!
Reply
Old May 6, 2003 | 12:56 PM
  #25  
Ni5mo180SX's Avatar
Thread Starter
White Comet
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,145
Likes: 0
From: Orange County
^
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:04 AM.