Trying to plan a WI setup
Thread Starter
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,410
Likes: 2
From: Atlanta, GA
Trying to plan a WI setup
So it was only a few days ago that I was considering water injection vs. no water injection, now it seems like I'm considering basic single stage pressure actuated water injection vs. full aquamist with fail safe water injection. I guess I just need some input. I am planning on running 93 octane gas only with max boost around 15psi through my ball bearing T04R (or Borg Warner S362 FMW if I end up changing turbos in the future). This should net me wheel horsepower in the low 400 range.
I don't feel like I'm pushing the engine/boost enough to really justify a $600+ water injection system, but it I want something that is dead nuts reliable since this is technically a track car build. In an ideal world I would get the Aquamist HFS-3 with the RX-7 summer circuit, however because this system will cost much more money that I am willing to spend right now, I am looking at MUCH simpler setups.
Would a standard single stage check valve system for AIS (Devil's Own) serve my needs as well as I believe it should? Was looking at activating the system at 10psi and having two LED's on the dash...one to tell if the system is switched on and the other for the low fluid level.
I don't feel like I'm pushing the engine/boost enough to really justify a $600+ water injection system, but it I want something that is dead nuts reliable since this is technically a track car build. In an ideal world I would get the Aquamist HFS-3 with the RX-7 summer circuit, however because this system will cost much more money that I am willing to spend right now, I am looking at MUCH simpler setups.
Would a standard single stage check valve system for AIS (Devil's Own) serve my needs as well as I believe it should? Was looking at activating the system at 10psi and having two LED's on the dash...one to tell if the system is switched on and the other for the low fluid level.
LOL. Good suggestions, but Peter's kit is DEFINITELY not under his "don't feel the need to spend $600" restriction. I'm thinking about getting the Wannaspeed kit this or next month for my setup though, due to its simplicity and reliability.
I am in the same boat as you, but after reading tom94RX-7 recent thread i am going with a simple kit from Coolingmist but with the 200psi pump and a CM5 super atomizing noozle. My goal is 500whp con pump and 100%water with a Precision 6266.
. There is a few threads floatiing around with part numers to put together a kit. eaiser just to buy from wannaspeedthough.
Thread Starter
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,410
Likes: 2
From: Atlanta, GA
I like how robust a pre-turbo mechanical system is, but after reading tom94RX-7's pre vs. post turbo WI thread I'm not convinced that I want that extra lag associated with pre-turbo WI.
For your needs, I would recommend a simple pump/switch system. At 15psi, you aren't depending on the AI, but definitely benefiting from it being there. It will definitley help with reliability of your engine. A pump/switch system will be inexpensive, and easy.
Trending Topics
Lag/Threshold is all relative...
For your needs, I would recommend a simple pump/switch system. At 15psi, you aren't depending on the AI, but definitely benefiting from it being there. It will definitley help with reliability of your engine. A pump/switch system will be inexpensive, and easy.
For your needs, I would recommend a simple pump/switch system. At 15psi, you aren't depending on the AI, but definitely benefiting from it being there. It will definitley help with reliability of your engine. A pump/switch system will be inexpensive, and easy.
A mid frame turbo that requires AI to achieve big power will greatly benefit from preturbo. The pneumatic function of the Atomizer Nozzle based system simply makes it more effective, and more reliable. DudemaaaansownRx7 has been making over 500whp at 20psi on the very same kit he sells. Peter has been using this technology for over 10 years with nothing short of killer results.
Can you do it with a pump and progressive system? Of course. Can you do it with a boost fed system and atomizer? Absolutely....
The choice really lyes in your preference. I personally am completely sold on manual preturbo WI. A pumpless system with a single electronic component. I am also using a modified T3 GT35R with a Vmount. Obviously a street setup with spool in mind. Preturbo will work extrememly well in meeting my goals of 500whp.
Awaiting return from my deployment to put the parts together.
Thread Starter
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,410
Likes: 2
From: Atlanta, GA
So what would it cost to build my own pre-turbo mechanical setup? Anyone have a link to one of threads that just startin was refering to for self built parts?
If I can build a full setup for under $300 that will meet my needs, I would be happy...whether it is mechanical or a pumped system. Once you get to the $400 price range, I would probably start looking at the Aquamist HFS-2 for $500.
If I can build a full setup for under $300 that will meet my needs, I would be happy...whether it is mechanical or a pumped system. Once you get to the $400 price range, I would probably start looking at the Aquamist HFS-2 for $500.
Most recent one. READ THREAD, Followed by PM'ing him if interested. My suggestion.
https://www.rx7club.com/auxiliary-injection-173/my-pre-turbo-wi-974884/
https://www.rx7club.com/auxiliary-injection-173/my-pre-turbo-wi-974884/
Thread Starter
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,410
Likes: 2
From: Atlanta, GA
Here's a question....as your fluid level in the water resevoir gets low (say below 50% in a 1 gallon resevoir) and their is more air volume, how does this affect the water/air supplied to the atomizer nozzle?
I have to imagine that the air in the tank will pressurize more slowly when the tank gets lower, which will cause the water injection to lag the manifold pressure causing inconsistant water injection during spool. Everything should be fine when the system stabilizes, but I really question the transient consistancy of this type of system.
Remember, I want this for a track application where I need consistant results for at least 30 minutes and enough water to support that time, not a drag race situation where I can top off the tank after each run.
I have to imagine that the air in the tank will pressurize more slowly when the tank gets lower, which will cause the water injection to lag the manifold pressure causing inconsistant water injection during spool. Everything should be fine when the system stabilizes, but I really question the transient consistancy of this type of system.
Remember, I want this for a track application where I need consistant results for at least 30 minutes and enough water to support that time, not a drag race situation where I can top off the tank after each run.
Thread Starter
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,410
Likes: 2
From: Atlanta, GA
I think I'm just going to end up going with a basic Devils Own single stage check valve system (5 gal/hr nozzle)...should be effective and reliable. Haven't figured out if I'm going to be able to fit the pump and a large enough tank in the engine bay yet or what size tank will be required for a 30 minute track session. Any guesses on what percentage of track time will be spent above 10 psi?
I would also still like to know the effects of low water level on the transient flow response of a mechanical water injection system though.
I would also still like to know the effects of low water level on the transient flow response of a mechanical water injection system though.
Thread Starter
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,410
Likes: 2
From: Atlanta, GA
So last night I sent another member payment for a AIS 3gal tank and aquatec 250psi pump for $150....so now I'm committed to mounting it behind my seat. The rest of the kit I am going to piece together either from AIS or Devil's Own. Here is a picture of the tank...the pump gets mounted inside/below it.

I do have two questions though.
1) At what pressure are the nozzles rated for correct flowrate? The pump will be operating at 200psi through a 22psi check valve making the effective nozzle pressure ~178 psi. If I decided to run two check valves (one for pre-turbo and one for pre-TB), then the nozzle pressure would be ~157 psi.
2) I'm debating between the AIS 22psi check valve and the Devil's Own 16psi check valve. The AIS one is the more conventional style while the Devil's Own is a custom one that they have made for their kits. Anyone have any experience with this 16psi valve?
I'm not worried about the 6psi difference when using one check valve, but if I were to use two, that would add 12 psi to my nozzle pressures over the 22psi check valves.

I do have two questions though.
1) At what pressure are the nozzles rated for correct flowrate? The pump will be operating at 200psi through a 22psi check valve making the effective nozzle pressure ~178 psi. If I decided to run two check valves (one for pre-turbo and one for pre-TB), then the nozzle pressure would be ~157 psi.
2) I'm debating between the AIS 22psi check valve and the Devil's Own 16psi check valve. The AIS one is the more conventional style while the Devil's Own is a custom one that they have made for their kits. Anyone have any experience with this 16psi valve?
I'm not worried about the 6psi difference when using one check valve, but if I were to use two, that would add 12 psi to my nozzle pressures over the 22psi check valves.
Nice tank!
1) At what pressure are the nozzles rated for correct flowrate? 150psi usually
If I decided to run two check valves (one for pre-turbo and one for pre-TB), then the nozzle pressure would be ~157 psi. use a Tee before the check valves and install one close to each nozzle then both nozzles will receive ~178psi.
1) At what pressure are the nozzles rated for correct flowrate? 150psi usually
If I decided to run two check valves (one for pre-turbo and one for pre-TB), then the nozzle pressure would be ~157 psi. use a Tee before the check valves and install one close to each nozzle then both nozzles will receive ~178psi.
Thread Starter
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,410
Likes: 2
From: Atlanta, GA
Also, I'm working on a calculator that will give corrected nozzle flows given specific system parameters. That's why I'm interested in the pressure that nozzles are rated at.
Thread Starter
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,410
Likes: 2
From: Atlanta, GA
It looks like nozzles are actually based on flow at 100psi.
From the AI Nozzle/Jet sticky....
and
Also, after reading this thread it is hard for me to trust coolingmists' numbers as I completely agree with Richard L's math.
https://www.rx7club.com/auxiliary-injection-173/indepth-study-wai-injection-systems-820079/
From the AI Nozzle/Jet sticky....
Nozzle Nomenclature:
what's w M10? M15?
i think it would be great if we all settle on CC/Minute.
generally we talk in those measures re our fuel injectors.
so, re M10...
the 10 refers to gallons per hour. one gallon per hour is the same rate as 63 CC/Min..
M10 is 10X63= 630 CC/Min.
M15 is 15X63 or 945 CC/Min.
i run 2 M10s for a 1260 CC/Min rate.
this is all at 100 PSI. and for the detail people you need to net out the boost, so if you want a net 100 psi and you are running 20 psi boost your pressure at the nozzle must be 120 psi. just like what we do w fuel pressure.
howard coleman
what's w M10? M15?
i think it would be great if we all settle on CC/Minute.
generally we talk in those measures re our fuel injectors.
so, re M10...
the 10 refers to gallons per hour. one gallon per hour is the same rate as 63 CC/Min..
M10 is 10X63= 630 CC/Min.
M15 is 15X63 or 945 CC/Min.
i run 2 M10s for a 1260 CC/Min rate.
this is all at 100 PSI. and for the detail people you need to net out the boost, so if you want a net 100 psi and you are running 20 psi boost your pressure at the nozzle must be 120 psi. just like what we do w fuel pressure.
howard coleman
Found this chart on enginerunup.com Makes it easier to compare nozzles which are rated in different ways. Anyone care to comment on the validity of the numbers?
M1 - (.011") - 1.0 GPH @ 100 PSI, 1.2 GPH @ 150 PSI, 63 CC/min @ 100 PSI, 76 CC/min @ 150 PSI
M2 - (.015") - 2.0 GPH @ 100 PSI, 2.4 GPH @ 150 PSI, 126 CC/min @ 100 PSI, 151 CC/min @ 150 PSI
M3 - (.020") - 3.0 GPH @ 100 PSI, 3.6 GPH @ 150 PSI, 189 CC/min @ 100 PSI, 227 CC/min @ 150 PSI
M4 - (.024") - 4.0 GPH @ 100 PSI, 4.8 GPH @ 150 PSI, 252 CC/min @ 100 PSI, 303 CC/min @ 150 PSI
M5 - (.035") - 5.0 GPH @ 100 PSI, 6.0 GPH @ 150 PSI, 316 CC/min @ 100 PSI, 379 CC/min @ 150 PSI
M7 - (.045") - 7.0 GPH @ 100 PSI, 8.4 GPH @ 150 PSI, 442 CC/min @ 100 PSI, 530 CC/min @ 150 PSI
M11 - (.073") - 11 GPH @ 100 PSI, 13.2 GPH @ 150 PSI, 694 CC/min @ 100 PSI, 833 CC/min @ 150 PSI
M1 - (.011") - 1.0 GPH @ 100 PSI, 1.2 GPH @ 150 PSI, 63 CC/min @ 100 PSI, 76 CC/min @ 150 PSI
M2 - (.015") - 2.0 GPH @ 100 PSI, 2.4 GPH @ 150 PSI, 126 CC/min @ 100 PSI, 151 CC/min @ 150 PSI
M3 - (.020") - 3.0 GPH @ 100 PSI, 3.6 GPH @ 150 PSI, 189 CC/min @ 100 PSI, 227 CC/min @ 150 PSI
M4 - (.024") - 4.0 GPH @ 100 PSI, 4.8 GPH @ 150 PSI, 252 CC/min @ 100 PSI, 303 CC/min @ 150 PSI
M5 - (.035") - 5.0 GPH @ 100 PSI, 6.0 GPH @ 150 PSI, 316 CC/min @ 100 PSI, 379 CC/min @ 150 PSI
M7 - (.045") - 7.0 GPH @ 100 PSI, 8.4 GPH @ 150 PSI, 442 CC/min @ 100 PSI, 530 CC/min @ 150 PSI
M11 - (.073") - 11 GPH @ 100 PSI, 13.2 GPH @ 150 PSI, 694 CC/min @ 100 PSI, 833 CC/min @ 150 PSI
https://www.rx7club.com/auxiliary-injection-173/indepth-study-wai-injection-systems-820079/
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jeff20B
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
73
Sep 16, 2018 07:16 PM
msilvia
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
15
Sep 11, 2015 12:13 PM




