3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

V-mount intercooler vs front mount?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 4, 2006 | 02:12 PM
  #26  
BLitzed33's Avatar
...
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 802
Likes: 0
From: md
Originally Posted by twokrx7
Then I guess my experince with a fan on a SMIC is not worth sharing, hold on to your unfounded dreams.
everyones experience's are different...just because you said your setup didnt work, doesnt mean someone elses's doesnt benefit them with a smiliar setup thats all I am saying, but you came off with a attitude "ITS WORTHLESS", and dreams, no, reality, car is making 544 whp with another 5 lbs to go if and when I put a stiffer wg spring in.
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2006 | 02:33 PM
  #27  
FDNewbie's Avatar
Sponsor
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,216
Likes: 4
From: Tampa, FL
I believe you owe me a ride...
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2006 | 02:38 PM
  #28  
BLitzed33's Avatar
...
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 802
Likes: 0
From: md
Originally Posted by FDNewbie
I believe you owe me a ride...
Lol, I pm'ed ya
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2006 | 02:40 PM
  #29  
rynberg's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 10
From: San Lorenzo, California
Originally Posted by DaiOni
FMIC no good for the track?? ahh... so how do panspeed, fujita, amemiya, et al make the fastest rwd cars in japan such great track weapons?? They've all stuck with FMIC for their top cars.

Not to say VMIC isn't a wonderful thing - but FMIC being no good for the track is an overstatement, at best. It can and HAS been done - repeatedly.

That said, you can certainly poke holes in the setup of many, many people who have posted engine bay shots....
You are pointing out full setup RACE CARS. Why don't you search the boards/archives here and see how many people have overheating problems at the track with FMICs? With these cars, in hot weather, it's difficult to keep them from overheating as it is. Howard Coleman measured the airflow through his IC -- it was less than 10 mph when the car was going 70 mph. Guess what that means? On track, when you are beating the **** out of the car, your radiator is only seeing the same amount of air it would normally see tooling around at 10 mph.

We always get a few responses like yours in these threads. People who have never been on a track always feel entitled to discount the experiences of dozens of owners over a 13-years period....just because some JDM tuners get away with the setup on a FULL RACE CAR.

There are pros and cons to all three setups, but to say the FMIC is good for track use, as compared to the other three, is to have your head stuck in the sand. Or up something else.
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2006 | 08:34 PM
  #30  
DaiOni's Avatar
Wankler
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,565
Likes: 2
From: Kobe, Japan
how do you know whether or not I've been to the track?

I didn't say that the FMIC was as good as the others - I said that it can and has been done.

Get yourself a copy of the hyperrev catalog and look at some of the setups on the street cars - not just the FULL RACE CARS - take a look at what fujita racing does with their twin turbo car. Take a look at what amemiya has been doing for YEARS with their street cars.

There are hundreds of FD circuit and targa competitors around the world who are successfully competing with FMIC setups.

Can't be done?

I think you have your head buried in a set of data which you take as 'bible'.

It was a bad blanket statement. That's my opinion, anyway.
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2006 | 08:40 PM
  #31  
DaiOni's Avatar
Wankler
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,565
Likes: 2
From: Kobe, Japan
Ramy: if fujita has been using a v-mount, I haven't seen it. Their big single and twin turbo track cars (which, I'll add, are not dedicated race cars - the twin car is far from it, yet still records extremely competitive times) still run FMIC and fat rad. Fujita have always used a setup with air intake piping and where the IC sits a little higher than the rad.
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2006 | 09:41 PM
  #32  
rynberg's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 10
From: San Lorenzo, California
Originally Posted by DaiOni
how do you know whether or not I've been to the track?
You're right, I lumped you into the vast majority of people who chime in on threads like this. My bad.

Originally Posted by DaiOni
I didn't say that the FMIC was as good as the others - I said that it can and has been done.

Get yourself a copy of the hyperrev catalog and look at some of the setups on the street cars - not just the FULL RACE CARS - take a look at what fujita racing does with their twin turbo car. Take a look at what amemiya has been doing for YEARS with their street cars.

There are hundreds of FD circuit and targa competitors around the world who are successfully competing with FMIC setups.

Can't be done?

I think you have your head buried in a set of data which you take as 'bible'.

It was a bad blanket statement. That's my opinion, anyway.
You are correct, it was a blanket statement. However, it applies to 99% of how cars are setup, in the US anyway. Don't forget that temps in the US are quite a bit hotter than in Japan, an FMIC may work just fine on a 70-75 track day, but fail on anything hotter. I have a lot of experience with temp control on the track, both personal and through other track guys here, and FMICs just don't cut it.

Anyone who is planning to track their car at least occasionally would be well advised to avoid an FMIC. I personally don't care what tuners in Japan are using. My view is based on the average owner car, not some professional tuner/racing team.
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2006 | 09:59 PM
  #33  
FDNewbie's Avatar
Sponsor
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,216
Likes: 4
From: Tampa, FL
Originally Posted by DaiOni
Ramy: if fujita has been using a v-mount, I haven't seen it. Their big single and twin turbo track cars (which, I'll add, are not dedicated race cars - the twin car is far from it, yet still records extremely competitive times) still run FMIC and fat rad. Fujita have always used a setup with air intake piping and where the IC sits a little higher than the rad.
You know what? That prob explains what I thought was a large SMIC (the IC higher than the radiator). So thanks for the clarification. But I know for a fact that Panspeed has a V-mount, as does RE (and not just for sale; but on their cars as well).

~Ramy
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2006 | 10:28 PM
  #34  
DaiOni's Avatar
Wankler
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,565
Likes: 2
From: Kobe, Japan
Yeah they do - and they are smart for running them (I agree - v-mounts are awesome). I think amemiya is running a v-mount on their d1 car, aren't they?

Panspeed, iirc, still run a FMIC on their awesome, awesome track car - probably the best in japan today, maybe with the exception of amemiya.

Amemiya also, last time I checked, still run a FMIC on their track cars. But, yes, these particular cars are far from 'street'.
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2006 | 11:30 AM
  #35  
A3ON7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 597
Likes: 0
From: CO,CA,NV,WA
Originally Posted by FLA94FD
From personal experience going from a FMIC from stock didn't make that much of a difference. I struggled with the same problem the V-Mount cost. All in all if you don't track your car or just take it to the strip a few times any system will work. On the stock twins the piping and size of a FMIC will increase lag by about a second down low. Where you are over heating shouldn't become a problem unless you retain the stock radiator.

Don't forget the attention factor as well for the FMIC.
I have already upgraded the radiator to fluidyne radiator and i'm going to buy the FC thermoswitch from atkins rotary, they can get it for around $50.

so if i expand the piping to 3 inch custom piping, will that reduce the lag?
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2006 | 11:36 AM
  #36  
A3ON7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 597
Likes: 0
From: CO,CA,NV,WA
Originally Posted by twokrx7
That fan is worthless unless you pop the hood. I ran the same setup and found that the fan will only circulate hot underhood air back thru the core dur to the restrictive cold air ducting. The fan did work well to cool the core with the hood up, say between autox runs or drag strip runs or dyno runs, but otherwise it did nada.

that's what i found out from some people on this forum regarding about running the SMIC, they did agree somehow about the restrictive air ducting.
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2006 | 11:40 AM
  #37  
Kento's Avatar
2/4 wheel cornering fiend
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,090
Likes: 3
From: Pasadena, CA
Originally Posted by A3ON7
so if i expand the piping to 3 inch custom piping, will that reduce the lag?
Expanding the piping will increase lag, because your turbos are required to pressurize more volume, and the airflow benefits will be minimal. Don't think the opposite either, because then you will start treading on airflow restriction within the IC piping.
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2006 | 11:47 AM
  #38  
the_glass_man's Avatar
Will u do me a kindness?
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 5,031
Likes: 4
From: Parlor City, NY
Originally Posted by FLA94FD
A custom triple or four pass radiator for the Rx-7 can cost little $600 I was going to have one install with my car but didn't want to wait 8 weeks for it. There is nothing about the FD radiator that makes it unique once it's mounted vertical. Yes it will require some minor fiting to get the hoses to line up right but considering all the Fitting work goes into most upgrades, most notably ducting which is a science this is pretty easy.
I built my custom triple pass for $250.
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2006 | 01:08 PM
  #39  
A3ON7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 597
Likes: 0
From: CO,CA,NV,WA
Originally Posted by Kento
Expanding the piping will increase lag, because your turbos are required to pressurize more volume, and the airflow benefits will be minimal. Don't think the opposite either, because then you will start treading on airflow restriction within the IC piping.
so what is the best way around, to prevent the lag and also to maximise the airflow using the FMIC.
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2006 | 03:08 PM
  #40  
z-beater's Avatar
REW'd FB
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,685
Likes: 1
From: WA
I know that this is not in a FD but thought that I would share. I went with a H-Mount. And since there is not a kit available I custom made the parts.

This setup was not cheap. Here is a cost break-down:

IC(24"x12"x3"): 162
Rad(Custom, most bad *** avail): 500
3" alum IC pipe(professionally welded): 300
High temp silicone couplers: 40
T-bolt clamps: 40
Steel for rad support: 30
AN fittings for OC: 70
Custom OC lines w pressed fittings: 130

As you can see it adds up fast. I am not too familiar with the price of 3rd gen v-mount systems.

When you are building for affordability FMIC is just fine. When you are building to race V-mount is the way to go IMO.

I have attached some pictures.

Hope this helps,
Z
Attached Thumbnails V-mount intercooler vs front mount?-car-garys-garage-2.jpg   V-mount intercooler vs front mount?-front-h-mount.jpg   V-mount intercooler vs front mount?-small-h-mount-side.jpg   V-mount intercooler vs front mount?-small-radiator.jpg   V-mount intercooler vs front mount?-small-complete-car-lic-plate.jpg  

Reply
Old Apr 6, 2022 | 07:31 AM
  #41  
kris98's Avatar
New to the Club!
 
Joined: Apr 2022
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
From: bingchilling
Originally Posted by rynberg
What threads did you read? FMICs are virtually unusable at the track. They even compromise the cooling system in extremely hot conditions on the street. The SMIC doesn't compromise cooling, but is subject to heat soak and cannot keep the AITs quite as low as a FMIC. It's a much better compromise for track driving and very hot street conditions though.

The v-mount avoids both of these problems and is the best of both worlds. Unfortunately, it puts the radiator fans extremely low to the ground and subject to damage. It is also more expensive/difficult to implement.

There are pros and cons to everything, unlike what some clueless people try to tell you. If you are only driving your car on the street or dragging the car, a FMIC will probably be fine. In any other case, there's no way in hell I would run one. My mechanic replaced his FMIC with an ASP large SMIC to reduce coolant temps...even in the Cali Bay Area.
hey, I was doing some research on the topic and I just wanted to say thanks. ur reply has cleared a lot of doubts regarding the topic.
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2022 | 09:11 AM
  #42  
TwinCharged RX7's Avatar
Built Not Bought
Tenured Member: 15 Years
Top Answer: 1
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 4,389
Likes: 962
From: Stamford, CT
FMIC Always worked well for me. Most of the time people don't duct them properly. They work fine as long as air still gets to the radiator. The rotary is not some magic engine with regard to cooling. FMIC is super common and proven to work across many platforms. Usually cooling problems are the result of other issues. Most VMount kits include ducting which is why they do not usually have issues.
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2022 | 09:36 AM
  #43  
ZumSpeedRX-7's Avatar
rotary amuse
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,102
Likes: 564
From: Massachusetts
Kudos Kris on your one and only post to date starting out with "I did some research on the topic" - melts my "use the search function - this question has been answered ad nauseam over the decades" grumpy old man heart


Two cents for posterity from a motorsport perspective - for autocross and track use I had nothing but issues keeping my temperatures down with a ducted HKS FMIC and Fluidyne radiator setup

My temps have been solid and in check going to a ducted Rotary Extreme v-mount intercooler with Koyo Radiator
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2022 | 11:58 AM
  #44  
Sgtblue's Avatar
Urban Combat Vet
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 12,159
Likes: 982
From: Mid-west
Originally Posted by TwinCharged RX7
….The rotary is not some magic engine with regard to cooling. FMIC is super common and proven to work across many platforms.
I think the large surface area of each combustion chamber, combined with the increased frequency of combustion events relative to a 4 cycle piston engine does make it sort of a “magic engine” when you’re talking load on the cooling system. Putting an additional heat-sink in front of the radiator, when much better alternatives exist, especially for a street driven car, makes no sense IMO.
I also doubt those many proven platforms would include the street driven FD on a hot summer day.

Last edited by Sgtblue; Apr 6, 2022 at 12:21 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2022 | 12:28 PM
  #45  
TwinCharged RX7's Avatar
Built Not Bought
Tenured Member: 15 Years
Top Answer: 1
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 4,389
Likes: 962
From: Stamford, CT
And do you have personal knowledge of this? Or just in the vmount fan club? a 2jz producing 700whp generates as much heat to extract than a 350hp FD. Yet they usually have FMIC.

Plenty of them running around in all kinds of cars with front mount intercoolers. Street driven, track driven, etc.

Again, it is not magic, proper sizing of the coolant system, making sure there is no in the system and the overflow is working properly, and good ducting. FMIC works fine. VMount also works fine. I'm just saying there is irrational sustain toward FMIC in the rotary community, not because they don't work, but because 1) lots of janky examples that weren't built right (similar to people saying rotaries aren't reliable or sequential twins aren't as good as parallel), and 2) V mount tends to have a "cool" factor in the FC/FD world. Most cars do not have room for a vmount.
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2022 | 12:58 PM
  #46  
TwinCharged RX7's Avatar
Built Not Bought
Tenured Member: 15 Years
Top Answer: 1
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 4,389
Likes: 962
From: Stamford, CT
I will admit that something like this will definitely not work though. This is what will give FMIC a bad name.



Reply
Old Apr 6, 2022 | 02:08 PM
  #47  
Red94fd's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 814
Likes: 96
From: Florida
I can't believe this topic still going on. The V mount is superior specially on a modified single turbo street car. Here in FL on humid summers and a front mount you will overheat on traffic.
I had both set ups, well ducted and the v mount is done and forgotten, no need to re invent the wheel.
Drag cars almost allways have the front mount intercooler as posted on the pic above.
Simple as no air to the heat exchangers no cooling, most front mount intercoolers cover the 85% of the front opening of the 7's bumper.
Now we all know that rotaries run hotter than piston engines so there is not comparison there.
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2022 | 02:20 PM
  #48  
TwinCharged RX7's Avatar
Built Not Bought
Tenured Member: 15 Years
Top Answer: 1
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 4,389
Likes: 962
From: Stamford, CT
You are incorrect. They produce more heat at the same power level, there are big hp cars running a lot more power than a typical FD, where they do produce as much, if not more heat, and work just fine with FMIC.

I also know a certain 4 rotor and a 3 rotor with over 1000hp and both have FMIC that appears to work fine. Including on track.
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2022 | 03:46 PM
  #49  
Red94fd's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 814
Likes: 96
From: Florida
Well, yes .. lol.. the block should run at the same temp as the one of the piston engine, but the exhaust runs about 250 °f hotter ence making the engine bay hotter. In a stop and go traffic that adds up quick to the components in the engine bay.
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2022 | 04:11 PM
  #50  
TwinCharged RX7's Avatar
Built Not Bought
Tenured Member: 15 Years
Top Answer: 1
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 4,389
Likes: 962
From: Stamford, CT
That's not what I'm talking about. Take one of the hundreds of 2jz cars with front mounts and running over 700hp, that will produce more heat to manage than a typical rotary with 400hp. Front mount can handle it just fine if executed properly. Just like a rotary can be reliable if executed properly.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:09 AM.