RX7Club.com - Mazda RX7 Forum

RX7Club.com - Mazda RX7 Forum (https://www.rx7club.com/)
-   3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) (https://www.rx7club.com/3rd-generation-specific-1993-2002-16/)
-   -   Turbos - stock vs 99 spec (https://www.rx7club.com/3rd-generation-specific-1993-2002-16/turbos-stock-vs-99-spec-732442/)

dblboinger 02-21-08 04:55 PM

Turbos - stock vs 99 spec
 
I have gotten a LOT of conflicting information regarding turbos, so I pose this question to people who have actually switched from stock to 99 spec....Did you notice a difference? If any other mods were done at the same time please include that info as well.

7racer 02-21-08 05:13 PM

nope. Didn't notice much of a difference. I did have the car ported and increased the boost. I expected to be totally blown away. Instead if feels about the same.

I road in a totally stock working car and it seems to boost quicker. I do have a boost issue where I am not hitting 4psi with no load, which maybe part of the problem. However, I am hitting targeted 10-9-10 13-11-13 with my lo/hi boost settings.

If I where to do it again and stay with twins, I would probably go the BNR route. FWIW

RX7LINK 02-21-08 05:31 PM

If i didn't get these 99specs for a good deal, i would've gone with BNRs.

might be because my old twins were a bit worn, but my 99spec pulls noticeably harder and hit the 2nd turbo switchover a lot quicker at same boost level compare to my OEM twins.

GoodfellaFD3S 02-21-08 05:44 PM

Being that the 99s will be brand new and you'll be ditching old tired turbos, you'll probably see a bit of a difference.

I just recently gave my dad's motor a mild port and build, and he bought brand new oem (usdm) turbos. Car is much faster than it was before at the same boost level.

varendra7 02-21-08 06:06 PM

the turbos of the 99 spec spool faster.
I think they are also more reliable at higher boost levels

dblboinger 02-21-08 06:19 PM

Running stock port with ~12k on the engine and turbos. I'm getting set for these upgrades with all parts in hand...Greddy FMIC and downpipe, Apexi intake and N1 catback, Power FC, Bonez hi-flow cat. I have a set of 99 spec turbos with ~15k on them. Should I put on the 99 spec turbos or sell them and hold out for the BNR's?

Previously I was told, with the other mods I have in mind, I would also need an upgraded fuel system and ignition to run the BNR's. The total cost was approaching $4500 and I didn't want to drop that much all at once so I picked up the 99 specs instead. Based on what I'm now hearing I might as well stay with the stock turbos.

GoodfellaFD3S 02-21-08 06:30 PM


Originally Posted by varendra7 (Post 7895151)
I think they are also more reliable at higher boost levels

Negative, they are LESS reliable at higher boost levels.

I think we need a sticky thread at the top of this section on this subject :)

dblboinger 02-21-08 06:38 PM

how do you change the boost level on stock turbos?

RX7LINK 02-21-08 06:47 PM

^^ gotta hook up a boost controller

manual or electronic.. both work



Originally Posted by GoodfellaFD3S (Post 7895234)
Negative, they are LESS reliable at higher boost levels.

I think we need a sticky thread at the top of this section on this subject :)

+1, yes. OEM vs 99spec turbos and difference between Efini vs 99spec :P

GoodfellaFD3S 02-21-08 07:00 PM


Originally Posted by dblboinger (Post 7895270)
how do you change the boost level on stock turbos?

You have a lot of reading to do ;)

Spend some time in the archives and you'll be up to speed.

rx7doorhandles 02-22-08 12:07 AM

If you are going to upgrade the turbos, and rip everything out, you might as well go single turbo in my opinion (once again just my opinion).

I have stock U.S. spec turbos that were on my 94 rx7 and made 301 whp at 15psi with the Power FC (which can cantrol boost levels on stock turbo's using stock boost solenoids), 3inch TB, other bolt ons after Dee Karagiannis tuned it. He told me that with stock twins with No porting you will max out at 320whp!!

So if you want more than 320whp go Single Turbo not 99 spec turbo's.

Here is a link to what a Well Tuned rx7 can do with stock Apex seals and a single turbo:) ENJOY!!

http://videos.streetfire.net/video/1...2c00e8acb1.htm

dblboinger 02-22-08 12:55 AM

Not interested in going single, but I'd like to know more about your setup.

And, no offense Goodfellas, but from my experience the search engine on this site is marginal at best. I did a search for threads on increased boost from stock turbos and got some threads on seats, wheels and even a cup-holder (?). I did get some on the turbos too though, so I'll do more research. It's just hard to find time to read a bunch of superficial garbage to get 1 or 2 tid bits of info, especially when you work as many hours as I do.





Originally Posted by rx7doorhandles (Post 7896536)
If you are going to upgrade the turbos, and rip everything out, you might as well go single turbo in my opinion (once again just my opinion).

I have stock U.S. spec turbos that were on my 94 rx7 and made 301 whp at 15psi with the Power FC (which can cantrol boost levels on stock turbo's using stock boost solenoids), 3inch TB, other bolt ons after Dee Karagiannis tuned it. He told me that with stock twins with No porting you will max out at 320whp!!

So if you want more than 320whp go Single Turbo not 99 spec turbo's.

Here is a link to what a Well Tuned rx7 can do with stock Apex seals and a single turbo:) ENJOY!!

http://videos.streetfire.net/video/1...2c00e8acb1.htm


dradon03 02-22-08 01:03 AM

The problem is you didn't bother looking in the 3rd Gen FAQ's. If you look there I am sure you will find all you need. Or else go back to the old Big List saved emails on www.fd3s.net, it is older but TONS of good information as well.

RX794 02-22-08 01:08 AM


Originally Posted by rx7doorhandles (Post 7896536)
If you are going to upgrade the turbos, and rip everything out, you might as well go single turbo in my opinion (once again just my opinion).

I have stock U.S. spec turbos that were on my 94 rx7 and made 301 whp at 15psi with the Power FC (which can cantrol boost levels on stock turbo's using stock boost solenoids), 3inch TB, other bolt ons after Dee Karagiannis tuned it. He told me that with stock twins with No porting you will max out at 320whp!!

So if you want more than 320whp go Single Turbo not 99 spec turbo's.

Here is a link to what a Well Tuned rx7 can do with stock Apex seals and a single turbo:) ENJOY!!

http://videos.streetfire.net/video/1...2c00e8acb1.htm

I beg to differ that you'll "max out" stock turbos at 320RWHP. I know this because my previous FD made more than that on stock motor/turbos as well as a few other people on this forum.

FallenCho 02-22-08 01:12 AM

Everyone always says go single but everyone forgets that you are far from street legal when going this route and some people don't wanna deal with the ways around that. I'm planning on going BNR's in May so I'm curious as to what differences there are at equal boost levels compared to the stockers.

garners_69 02-22-08 03:14 AM

even though ur changing turbos the 13btt is completely different to the 13brew motor

RX7LINK 02-22-08 01:21 PM

if you want more HP output, there's a lot of other things that can help you to have better power transfer onto the wheels like lightweight flywheel, twin or triple plate clutch, LSD, torque brace, engine bushings....etc.. ofcourse the condition of your motor, turbos, ignition, fuel, intake and exhaust also factors into your output

i'm making 338 whp @ 14psi with my 99specs. pumped gas stock port and a bad slipping clutch... here's my dyno and mods.. https://www.rx7club.com/showpost.php...&postcount=248

dtn666 02-22-08 03:34 PM

I went with new 99 twins since I wasn't sure if my Pettit ECU could handle the BNRs. My MBC is set for about 9 psi and it feels like the old stockers powerwise (I know, I'm at 9 psi :), the new twins do seem to boost quicker.

I have a mild streetported engine.

rx7doorhandles 02-23-08 09:16 PM

twin turbo setup
 
dblboinger thats cool sticking with the twin turbo setup, also I agree finding what your looking for can take some time on this site

Here is my setup (my goal was to max out my twin turbo setup and keep it a street legal daily driver)
- Have my Air pump still in my car
- 3 inch downpipe, midpipe w/high flow cat(rx7 store), 3inch HKS cat back
- Apexi PFC tuned by Dee Karagiannis
- ACT heavy duty clutch, 9.5 lb Flywheel
- Redline fluids
- Efini Y pipe
- Upgraded intercooler (in stock location) one off custom job with Tial BOV welded to it)
- Aluminum Race Radiator
- Hard Intercooler piping (RE Amemiya)
- M2 Carbon Fiber Intake w/K&N filters
- Hard pipes intake(rx7 store)
- SS Clutch line
- New Fuel Filter
- Religous Oil changes
- Boost gauge and CD player(my ice JK)

I love how many people here are making these high horsepower #'s or fast 1/4 mile times and their clutch's are always slipping?:)? If the clutch's are slipping how are they putting down the power. Well there is always someone to one up you out there.
I dont want to start fights here, I was just repeating what Dee Karagiannis said "320 whp with no porting and stock twins" and he has some serious credentials http://rotarynews.com/node/view/709 he tuned that 7.86 at 169.13 RX7...enough said:)!!!

Good Luck with what ever you do dblboinger! You can always PM with any further questions

twomucboost4u 03-14-08 02:51 PM

So i made 322 @!12lbs of boost stock ports and tired turbos was told if my turbos were not up to snuff and I could have made 330 easy at the same 12lbs? I dont understand why people put stock twins on large ported motors you are decreasing the efficiency and making it harder to make power by overworking the stock components.

Chris

SiH 03-14-08 04:19 PM

FWIW, I have just made 343fwhp on a stock engine, stock ports with 99 spec twins, HKS DP, silenced mid pipe, Nur spec, XSP intercooler (V-mounted) , and Apexi filters, all managed by a PFC.
Unfortuantely the car came with the 99 specs so can't give a valid comparison.
Certainly seems to boost and spool very well though. I'll try to get some figures within the next few days.

ahad 03-14-08 04:37 PM


Originally Posted by twomucboost4u (Post 7978342)
So i made 322 @!12lbs of boost stock ports and tired turbos was told if my turbos were not up to snuff and I could have made 330 easy at the same 12lbs? I dont understand why people put stock twins on large ported motors you are decreasing the efficiency and making it harder to make power by overworking the stock components.

Chris

eyy man im switching to the 99 spec twins too next week...wanted to knw how much boost i can safely run without the power FC...ill be getting a walbro 255 with it and an FPR so any idea how far i can take it with these mods...intake, downpiping n intercooler included...thanks!

Montego 03-14-08 04:47 PM

^^^ 10 lbs and I'm not kidding

twomucboost4u 03-14-08 04:49 PM

^^^^ Wouldnt take it very far without a engine management(Power FC) not worth the risk.

Chris

MAXX65 03-14-08 04:54 PM

Its best not to bump up the boost till you have tuned it properly.

Although, per my reserch about 99 twins, just installed a set a month ago, they are ment to run 11 psi with a 99 spec ECU. however; without the 99 ECU or a PFC your really don't want to push the engine. Bad engine management equals a rolling frame. stay stock boost till you have a good management system.

This is just my 2 cents. I'm the type that believes in doing it all at one time the right way or not doing it at all.

XxMerlinxX 03-14-08 05:04 PM


Originally Posted by MAXX65 (Post 7978826)
Its best not to bump up the boost till you have tuned it properly.

Although, per my reserch about 99 twins, just installed a set a month ago, they are ment to run 11 psi with a 99 spec ECU. however; without the 99 ECU or a PFC your really don't want to push the engine. Bad engine management equals a rolling frame. stay stock boost till you have a good management system.

This is just my 2 cents. I'm the type that believes in doing it all at one time the right way or not doing it at all.


Hey Jason, how are those '99 twins working out for you?

MAXX65 03-14-08 05:40 PM

Thanks for asking...

After figuring out the engine was flooded, I finally got it started on Weds. within 5 min. of being started the temp gauge went through the roof and the coolent started boiling and I got some smoke from the engine bay. I think its either a clogged coolent line or the water pump. Unfortunetly I am limited on time to get under the hood, so it will probably be another month before I can get back to the car. hopefully it will be a quick fix, so I can focuse my time on installing my PFC and boost controller.

Its fun to work on cars when your making it better, not making it run!

XxMerlinxX 03-14-08 06:11 PM

Sorry to hear you're having trouble with it, it's more fun when you get to drive them more than work on them too. Let me know if you need a new water pump, I should have one laying around from my old motor.

Sukai94 03-14-08 06:21 PM

I have 99 specs. I think they spool faster. If you are going to buy them new go with BNR's.

ahad 03-15-08 01:50 PM


Originally Posted by MAXX65 (Post 7978826)
Its best not to bump up the boost till you have tuned it properly.

Although, per my reserch about 99 twins, just installed a set a month ago, they are ment to run 11 psi with a 99 spec ECU. however; without the 99 ECU or a PFC your really don't want to push the engine. Bad engine management equals a rolling frame. stay stock boost till you have a good management system.

This is just my 2 cents. I'm the type that believes in doing it all at one time the right way or not doing it at all.

and what would u suggest i do if u live in a country where there is no such thing as tuning a rotary engine?:wallbash:

XxMerlinxX 03-15-08 01:55 PM

You can buy a pre-programmed ecu on this board. RE Amemiya, Knightsports, XS Engineering, and a few others have stock ecu's that they reprogram for more mods and higher boost. You'll just swap out ecu's and then you'll be able to safely raise the boost for whatever it's been programmed to. Most of these have a limit of around 14-16psi, which is basically the limit of what you can do with stock twins anyway.

sonick117x 03-15-08 02:13 PM


Originally Posted by FallenCho (Post 7896693)
Everyone always says go single but everyone forgets that you are far from street legal when going this route ...

Don't mean to jack this thread, but why is this far from street legal? :Wconfused

Tim Benton 03-15-08 08:35 PM


Originally Posted by GoodfellaFD3S (Post 7895234)
Negative, they are LESS reliable at higher boost levels.

I think we need a sticky thread at the top of this section on this subject :)

Rich,

Not as active on the forum as I used to be, just curious where the 99 are less reliable comes from?

Tim

tom94RX-7 03-15-08 11:43 PM

FWIW, I also got 343 hp on a stock internal motor, stock seq. turbos that are probably tired with 104k miles. But I can do 11.19 @ 123.8 in the 1/4 mile and many people here think that the dyno must be wrong and that I should be making more than 343 hp. I'm thinking about getting and trying out a set of low mile stock seq. turbos and see if I can make more power, or maybe try to get some low miles full non seq. turbos to try out and get into the 10s (would like to do that with seq. turbos). I wouldn't spend the money for the 99 spec. BNR's would be nice but I got the car fast enough already with stock turbos that it wouldn't be worth it for me to pay for BNRs now.

GoodfellaFD3S 03-16-08 10:26 AM


Originally Posted by Tim Benton (Post 7982028)
Rich,

Not as active on the forum as I used to be, just curious where the 99 are less reliable comes from?

Tim

Supposedly all the japanese tuners limit the 99 spec-equipped cars to about 0.9 bar/13 psi due to their intolerance to long term higher boost applications. If you search, I believe Daioni (Daoini?), who lives in japan, has posted in depth about the differences.

dblboinger 03-17-08 01:06 AM

After reading a lot and talking to a lot of people I think the 99spec turbo upgrade is over rated. From what I have heard/read the OEM turbos are capable of hp numbers as higher or higher than the 99spec. People claim the 99spec spool quicker, but I have yet to find any documented evidence that this is true. I don't know if there is any way to plot boost or hp vs response time, but if there is I have't found it yet. Everything I have found plots hp vs rpm only. IMO, that'a a lot of $$$ for such a small return...think I'll use my $$$ to improve the fuel and ignition in preparation for the BNR's. Anybody looking for a good set of slightly used 99 spec turbos?

varendra7 03-17-08 08:14 PM

i think that it prob is overrated too...i mean my car is a 2001 so it comes with the turbos but I wouldnt buy them if my car had the older spec turbos.
my 2c

ahad 03-18-08 10:45 AM

and what if u need new twins neway? THEN what would you guys suggest?

XxMerlinxX 03-18-08 11:41 AM


Originally Posted by dblboinger (Post 7985999)
After reading a lot and talking to a lot of people I think the 99spec turbo upgrade is over rated. From what I have heard/read the OEM turbos are capable of hp numbers as higher or higher than the 99spec. People claim the 99spec spool quicker, but I have yet to find any documented evidence that this is true. I don't know if there is any way to plot boost or hp vs response time, but if there is I have't found it yet. Everything I have found plots hp vs rpm only. IMO, that'a a lot of $$$ for such a small return...think I'll use my $$$ to improve the fuel and ignition in preparation for the BNR's. Anybody looking for a good set of slightly used 99 spec turbos?

I think a Datalogit will plot boost over rpm, and the '99s do indeed spool more quickly than the earlier models. This comes from the abradable seal that's used, which also makes them more efficient, and so will produce slightly more hp at the same boost level. As evidence, Tim Benton ran the same mods and fuel map for the US spec twins at 14.2 psi and made 334, but with the '99 spec twins he made 340. A small difference obviously, but when he retuned for the '99 spec twin's extra efficiency, he ended up making 363rwhp overall, and that's on a stock port motor.

XxMerlinxX 03-18-08 11:42 AM


Originally Posted by ahad (Post 7990859)
and what if u need new twins neway? THEN what would you guys suggest?

I would see if I could get a deal on a set of used '99 spec. They're not worth price when purchased brand new, but used you can find some good deals. If not, go with a set of used stock twins that you know are in good condition.

MAXX65 03-18-08 11:48 AM

Unless you can get them for a good price like I did, you should go with BNR if you want to stay with twins. her is the web site: http://www.bnrturbos.com/3rdGen.htm

I wanted to go BNR, but the wallet was not permitting it at the time, maybe next year. They are $2350 U.S.

I think it was goodfellaFD3s that made 400+ rwhp on his twin BNRs. (I could be wrong since i've seen a lot of peoples numbers on this forum.)

spaceman_spiff 03-18-08 12:53 PM


Originally Posted by XxMerlinxX (Post 7981128)
You can buy a pre-programmed ecu on this board. RE Amemiya, Knightsports, XS Engineering, and a few others have stock ecu's that they reprogram for more mods and higher boost. You'll just swap out ecu's and then you'll be able to safely raise the boost for whatever it's been programmed to. Most of these have a limit of around 14-16psi, which is basically the limit of what you can do with stock twins anyway.

I've never heard of this, I always thought that the PFC or Haltech was the only way to go as a full-replacement over the stock ECU. These are stock ecu's for sale? And you can just plug these in and safely turn up the boost?

ahad 03-18-08 02:35 PM


Originally Posted by spaceman_spiff (Post 7991337)
I've never heard of this, I always thought that the PFC or Haltech was the only way to go as a full-replacement over the stock ECU. These are stock ecu's for sale? And you can just plug these in and safely turn up the boost?

man ive heard thats too risky...i knw a guy selling an ecu like that here but he doesnt knw the specs...and from what ive haerd if u have the wrong ecu ur engines goin bye bye...

tom94RX-7 03-18-08 02:38 PM

If you have a wideband to monitor the AFRs I think you should be fine, increase the boost until the ecu stops adding enough fuel to keep you from running lean, of course you have to watch the inj. duty cycles. not sure about the timing maps

XxMerlinxX 03-18-08 04:37 PM


Originally Posted by ahad (Post 7991739)
man ive heard thats too risky...i knw a guy selling an ecu like that here but he doesnt knw the specs...and from what ive haerd if u have the wrong ecu ur engines goin bye bye...

There's nothing risky about it, people have been using them for years. If you don't have any idea what it's tuned for, as in the original shop's label is gone or the original owner never kept track, then no, I wouldn't use it. RE Amemiya ecu's have a sticker on the back that tells what the ecu is tuned for, and most of the people with the Pettit ecu's know exactly what it's tuned for.

dblboinger 03-18-08 11:29 PM


Originally Posted by ahad (Post 7990859)
and what if u need new twins neway? THEN what would you guys suggest?

I'd go with the BNR Stage 3. They're cheaper than new 99 spec and you can get more out of them.

j9fd3s 03-19-08 02:27 PM


Originally Posted by rx7doorhandles (Post 7902576)
dblboinger thats cool sticking with the twin turbo setup, also I agree finding what your looking for can take some time on this site

Here is my setup (my goal was to max out my twin turbo setup and keep it a street legal daily driver)
- Have my Air pump still in my car
- 3 inch downpipe, midpipe w/high flow cat(rx7 store), 3inch HKS cat back
- Apexi PFC tuned by Dee Karagiannis
- ACT heavy duty clutch, 9.5 lb Flywheel
- Redline fluids
- Efini Y pipe
- Upgraded intercooler (in stock location) one off custom job with Tial BOV welded to it)
- Aluminum Race Radiator
- Hard Intercooler piping (RE Amemiya)
- M2 Carbon Fiber Intake w/K&N filters
- Hard pipes intake(rx7 store)
- SS Clutch line
- New Fuel Filter
- Religous Oil changes
- Boost gauge and CD player(my ice JK)

I love how many people here are making these high horsepower #'s or fast 1/4 mile times and their clutch's are always slipping?:)? If the clutch's are slipping how are they putting down the power. Well there is always someone to one up you out there.
I dont want to start fights here, I was just repeating what Dee Karagiannis said "320 whp with no porting and stock twins" and he has some serious credentials http://rotarynews.com/node/view/709 he tuned that 7.86 at 169.13 RX7...enough said:)!!!

Good Luck with what ever you do dblboinger! You can always PM with any further questions

stock port engine? then 320ish is about right, especially with a main cat, and some reliability.

friend of mine did 387rwhp on stock turbos, but he's got no cat and a big port, turbos were basically boosting as much as he could make em (17ish, dropping at high rpms)

ahad 03-19-08 02:52 PM


Originally Posted by XxMerlinxX (Post 7992169)
There's nothing risky about it, people have been using them for years. If you don't have any idea what it's tuned for, as in the original shop's label is gone or the original owner never kept track, then no, I wouldn't use it. RE Amemiya ecu's have a sticker on the back that tells what the ecu is tuned for, and most of the people with the Pettit ecu's know exactly what it's tuned for.

man i dunno i knw a couple o guys who ordered ECU's and ended up blowin their engines...

XxMerlinxX 03-19-08 05:21 PM

You know multiple people who ordered redom ecu's and blew their engines because of it? That seems pretty unlikely.

ahad 03-20-08 09:48 AM


Originally Posted by XxMerlinxX (Post 7996811)
You know multiple people who ordered redom ecu's and blew their engines because of it? That seems pretty unlikely.

haha dude it is unlikely but it did happen...one guy ordered the ecu put it in his fd blew his engine...his friend tried that same ecu and ended up blowing his engine:lol: so umm yeah it happened bro...


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:29 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands