![]() |
how to go from sequential to inline...?
what are the steps i need to go from my sequential setup to inline, just take out the butterfly? i need ab oostcontroller too right?
|
if your sequential works fine DONT go the parellel... it sucks ass
|
they dont , my second hits and i justhear air blowing. not sure whati s wrong
but has no leakage. any ideas? |
Re: how to go from sequential to inline...?
Originally posted by wanarace74 what are the steps i need to go from my sequential setup to inline, just take out the butterfly? i need ab oostcontroller too right? http://www.scuderiaciriani.com/rx7/non-sequential.html |
If you hear air blowing but your not getting any psi you should check your plastic elbow, your most likely leaking.....
Honestly, only go parellel as a last option. It ruins the fun of the car. IMO |
If you have a boost leak, going non-sequential isn't going to make anything better....you'll still have a boost leak.
|
then is there even a benefit?
|
Originally posted by REDNECK then is there even a benefit? - they have problems with the twin control system that they can't solve. - the transition tends to get more violent as you mod the car and raise the boost. Non-sequential obviously eliminates this - they regularly road race the car and the non-sequential torque curve is more predictable with no surprises - they are deluding themselves thinking that non-sequential is more fun in street driving. |
Originally posted by rynberg There's a difference between a boost leak and a problem with some aspect of the twin control system. Most people go non-sequential because: - they have problems with the twin control system that they can't solve. - the transition tends to get more violent as you mod the car and raise the boost. Non-sequential obviously eliminates this - they regularly road race the car and the non-sequential torque curve is more predictable with no surprises - they are deluding themselves thinking that non-sequential is more fun in street driving. Mazda Australia raced there FD RX-7's in non-sequential form for the 92-93-94-95 Bathurst 12-hour. This was to ensure a predictable torque curve & get every last ounce of power from them. Having driven there 95 race car both on the track & street, it was a complete dog until after 4000rpm & I would have hated it if it were a street machine. |
wow ,thanx guys, so maybe a vacuum line is hooked up wrong?
|
infact!!!!!!T the seoncd turbos intake... thats the wrong way.... you can hear it boosting OUT the second intake!!!!!
|
Originally posted by wanarace74 infact!!!!!!T the seoncd turbos intake... thats the wrong way.... you can hear it boosting OUT the second intake!!!!! :confused:Huh:confused: |
Originally posted by wanarace74 infact!!!!!!T the seoncd turbos intake... thats the wrong way.... you can hear it boosting OUT the second intake!!!!! Check this site: http://www.autosportracetech.com/RX-...leshooting.htm Look at the area for the secondary boost. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:39 AM. |
© 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands