3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Engine Build Problem

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 17, 2005 | 05:18 PM
  #1  
Fulblown's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton, AB, CA
Engine Build Problem

OK.... first thankyou in advance.

I have a 1994 Rx7 with a single turbo conversion.

I went to go FINALLY have my RX7 tuned and the tuner told me that my motor had a S6 housing on the front and a S4 housing on the rear. He told me that my motor is UNtunable, because there is a timing variance between the spark plug position of a S4 vs. a S6. (apprx 8 degrees)

Is this true?

Am I going to have the tear out my whole install to rebiuld my motor with two S6 housings??

The setup I have is able to push 500Hp+, we were going to tune it to approx 440hp.

Thank you,

Please verify this and please send me your comments.

fulblown@gmail.com
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2005 | 08:32 PM
  #2  
OneRotor's Avatar
RAWR
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,860
Likes: 2
From: 90024
free bump, because i have no clue whether the tuner is tellin you the truth or not, but why do you have a S6 housing in the front and a S4 housing on the rear? aren't S4 housings 4 port, and S5 and up are 6 port? i'd be interested in the flow characteristics between the two
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2005 | 08:58 PM
  #3  
rynberg's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 10
From: San Lorenzo, California
So you are saying that your engine was built using a rotor housing from a 13B-REW and another rotor housing from a 13B n/a? Since you can't tune each housing individually, yes, it's very likely you are screwed.

Who the hell built your motor?
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2005 | 12:17 AM
  #4  
lopedl's Avatar
Forever Modified
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,423
Likes: 0
From: WA
Hayes Rotary? I have witnessed such incedents.
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2005 | 12:38 AM
  #5  
RotaryResurrection's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,576
Likes: 27
From: Morristown, TN (east of Knoxville)
Yeah, it wouldnt be half as bad if there were 2 of EITHER set of housing...2 s4's, though not recommended, would have worked no problem...just relocate the knock sensor to the INT iron and you're golden (like the s4 turbo engine has it stock). Though I have, in rare instances, did a housing swap like this (out of necessity, with prior clearance), I would never try and mix and match the housings like that.

You have 2 options. Go ahead and run it as-is, tune it as best as possible and hope for the best, or tear it down and replace both that s4 housing AND the seals that rode on it, unless it was in new condition with no grooving or wear patterns. Either way, you have to come out of pocket for a housing...if you wait, you might have to pay for a rotor as well. If the engine is tight at this point I'd be tempted to do a conservative tune and let it play out...you're only talking a couple or 3 hundred bucks difference at that point, between replacing it now while the rotor is still good, or waiting for it to tear up and tearing up the rotor in the process.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rotor_veux
Build Threads
46
Jun 12, 2018 10:39 AM
alphawolff
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
17
Nov 17, 2015 05:57 PM
gtcd
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
30
Aug 19, 2015 02:44 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:32 AM.