RX7Club.com - Mazda RX7 Forum

RX7Club.com - Mazda RX7 Forum (https://www.rx7club.com/)
-   2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) (https://www.rx7club.com/2nd-generation-specific-1986-1992-17/)
-   -   Removed Rat's Nest, Vacuum for FPR? (https://www.rx7club.com/2nd-generation-specific-1986-1992-17/removed-rats-nest-vacuum-fpr-1080791/)

2jzfc 03-25-15 07:09 PM

Removed Rat's Nest, Vacuum for FPR?
 
Hey everybody, like the title says. I removed my rat's nest, and was wondering where is a good place to get vacuum for the FPR?

DC5Daniel 03-25-15 07:46 PM

I'm not sure if it's the same on an NA, but on a TII we use a nipple right where the subzero used to be, under the UIM.

2jzfc 03-25-15 11:11 PM


Originally Posted by DC5Daniel (Post 11890684)
I'm not sure if it's the same on an NA, but on a TII we use a nipple right where the subzero used to be, under the UIM.

Can anybody confirm or deny this is a logical location for an S4 N/A?

spectre6000 03-26-15 07:14 AM

What is the FPR, and what kind of vacuum signal does it need?

clokker 03-26-15 07:28 AM

FPR= Fuel Pressure Regulator

spectre6000 03-26-15 07:29 AM

What kind of vacuum signal does it want? Manifold, constant, or something otherwise modified?

clokker 03-26-15 07:36 AM

Manifold, I would imagine.

spectre6000 03-26-15 07:38 AM

It would certainly make sense since fuel regulator would probably want a vacuum signal in order to regulate fuel delivery, a metric based on fuel need, which is in turn dictated by throttle position (and RPM). Sounds like any vacuum port coming from the manifold engine-side of the throttle plate itself would be a viable candidate.

2jzfc 03-26-15 09:29 AM

I have a few spots on the intake manifold I can use then.

spectre6000 03-26-15 10:07 AM

Anything between the throttle and the keg would have the same vacuum signal.

2jzfc 03-26-15 08:58 PM

1 Attachment(s)
This is the location I chose, on the LIM passenger side:

Attachment 627963

scathcart 03-27-15 12:26 PM


Originally Posted by spectre6000 (Post 11890866)
It would certainly make sense since fuel regulator would probably want a vacuum signal in order to regulate fuel delivery, a metric based on fuel need, which is in turn dictated by throttle position (and RPM). Sounds like any vacuum port coming from the manifold engine-side of the throttle plate itself would be a viable candidate.

It's not quite that complicated.
Fuel pressure determines injector spray pattern. When the intake manifold is under vacuum due to closed, or partially closed, throttle plates, the injectors are also under vacuum, and when the injector opens, the vacuum attempts to suck the fuel into the engine.
Similarly, under boost, the manifold pressure attempts to push the fuel back into the rail.
So, to keep the pressure differential roughly a constant ~40-45 psi, the fuel pressure is referenced to the intake pressure, dropping the rail pressure approximately 1 psi for every 2 inches of vacuum, and increasing rail pressure at 1:1 for every psi of boost.

spectre6000 03-27-15 12:31 PM

Good to know the specific whys and hows. Your application specific explanation of what's going on sounds a bit more complicated than I described (I certainly didn't allow for any consideration for forced induction, spray pattern, etc.). Some day I'll figure out all this newfangled electrickery...

Regardless, the end result is the same. Anything between the throttle plate and the intake port will get the job done. It's all the same signal; whatever is most convenient.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:13 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands