2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

Ported center iron, stock 6-port end irons?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 12, 2019 | 06:11 PM
  #1  
bilcoh's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Tenured Member: 5 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 45
Likes: 3
From: Seattle, WA
Ported center iron, stock 6-port end irons?

Jeebus, I'm so scared to post this. Noob to rotaries here, and noob to road racing also. Here's my idiot question.

We're on a short timeline to build a motor for our next race, which is for budget endurance racing. We've got a center iron with a big street port done, but only stock 6-port end irons. Rotor housings have been exhaust ported.

So, what happens if we just Devcon the 6-ports to eliminate the cave, but otherwise run them with the ported center iron?

Stupidest thing ever, or just less power than if the end irons were also ported? And we expect to be pulling and rebuilding engines given what we're doing to them, so it's not like this is gonna be a 75K motor.

Thanks for going easy on me.
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2019 | 06:27 PM
  #2  
FührerTüner's Avatar
Penis Healthy
Tenured Member: 10 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 2,596
Likes: 799
From: █▬█ █▄█ █▬█ █▄██▬█ █▄█ █▬█ █▄█
Stock ECU I'm assuming? Instead of Devcon why not just disable the 5/6 port activation? Youre going to lose top end as i'm sure you know.

But with the big port on a stock tune the car may run lean and like crap.
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2019 | 06:45 PM
  #3  
bilcoh's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Tenured Member: 5 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 45
Likes: 3
From: Seattle, WA
Yes, stock ECU. We ran several races with the 5/6 disabled on the intake, and the engine had a stock center iron and mildly street-ported end irons. It was running great till we threw a water pump belt and didn't catch it in time. Not a ton of power, but that's not our goal at this point. It came alive around 4,000, and pulled consistently to 8,000. Don't want to rebuild the old engine due to extreme overheating. So, looking through our stock, found we had these ported irons from someone else. Feeling good about the center, less about the ends.

So, I guess we'd been running the reverse before, which is ported ends, stock center. What if we reverse that, but with a bigger center iron port?

Also, if we disabled the 5/6 port actuators (by removing them, so full open like it is) my experience was that we had no torque down low, but the top end was great. Am I misunderstanding this one? Or were you saying disabled as in full closed all the time?

Thanks again for the help.
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2019 | 09:25 PM
  #4  
Dak's Avatar
Dak
Information Regurgitator
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,990
Likes: 208
From: Sparta TN. United States
Originally Posted by bilcoh
Yes, stock ECU. We ran several races with the 5/6 disabled on the intake, and the engine had a stock center iron and mildly street-ported end irons. It was running great till we threw a water pump belt and didn't catch it in time. Not a ton of power, but that's not our goal at this point. It came alive around 4,000, and pulled consistently to 8,000. Don't want to rebuild the old engine due to extreme overheating. So, looking through our stock, found we had these ported irons from someone else. Feeling good about the center, less about the ends.

So, I guess we'd been running the reverse before, which is ported ends, stock center. What if we reverse that, but with a bigger center iron port?

Also, if we disabled the 5/6 port actuators (by removing them, so full open like it is) my experience was that we had no torque down low, but the top end was great. Am I misunderstanding this one? Or were you saying disabled as in full closed all the time?

Thanks again for the help.
I think he meant disabled as in fixed to be open all the time or removed sleeves like in your previous engine. Also from what I understand the 5th and 6th ports close so late there's not much benefit in porting them anyway. On mine I didn't even touch them. I just opened the secondaries a little sooner and ported the primaries all using Pineapple Racing templates and it runs fine so I think it'll be ok.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2019 | 12:24 AM
  #5  
SpikeDerailed's Avatar
This sh*t burns oil!
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,239
Likes: 5
From: Charlotte, NC - USA
What kind of an intake setup are you running on this car? I assume a stock manifold since youre using the stock ECU, but which version the 86-88 or 89-91?
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2019 | 09:30 AM
  #6  
KNONFS's Avatar
B O R I C U A
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,482
Likes: 36
From: VA
Originally Posted by bilcoh
Jeebus, I'm so scared to post this. Noob to rotaries here, and noob to road racing also. Here's my idiot question.

We're on a short timeline to build a motor for our next race, which is for budget endurance racing. We've got a center iron with a big street port done, but only stock 6-port end irons. Rotor housings have been exhaust ported.

So, what happens if we just Devcon the 6-ports to eliminate the cave, but otherwise run them with the ported center iron?

Stupidest thing ever, or just less power than if the end irons were also ported? And we expect to be pulling and rebuilding engines given what we're doing to them, so it's not like this is gonna be a 75K motor.

Thanks for going easy on me.
It will work. Like others mentioned, I would skip the devcon, just because it eliminates the chance of a failure, instead, I would port the 6 port irons. Not by choice, but I ran a ported 6 port with a disable (wired open) 6 ports, on a stock ecu. The car ran fine, sure the AFRs weren't ideal, and I wasn't making the most HP, but it was 99% streetable (except for the loss of torque in the low mid, and the 200-400rpm higher idle)
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2019 | 09:47 AM
  #7  
diabolical1's Avatar
Moderator
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 10,999
Likes: 349
From: FL
i know you mentioned a time factor, but if you have the time, then you should probably do this ...
Originally Posted by Dak
I just opened the secondaries a little sooner and ported the primaries all using Pineapple Racing templates and it runs fine so I think it'll be ok.
and then this ...
Originally Posted by bilcoh
... just Devcon the 6-ports to eliminate the cave ...
though, i would say do the sleeves, not the port itself. keeping them functional might be more beneficial for what you have in mind.

that said, with regards to the original question, if you only run ported primaries, the engine will be fine. obviously it's not the best situation, but it will work.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2019 | 10:59 AM
  #8  
bilcoh's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Tenured Member: 5 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 45
Likes: 3
From: Seattle, WA
Thanks for the input, everyone. Very helpful. In the end, it looks like our lead mechanic wants to port his own irons, so we're going to start with some fresh S5's and go from there. I'll pass along the info about the actuators.

Since this is a road racing car, low end isn't important, nor is streetability.

Cheers,

Dave
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2019 | 03:07 PM
  #9  
djessence's Avatar
djessence
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,063
Likes: 0
From: Alberta, Canada
Originally Posted by KNONFS
It will work. Like others mentioned, I would skip the devcon, just because it eliminates the chance of a failure, instead, I would port the 6 port irons. Not by choice, but I ran a ported 6 port with a disable (wired open) 6 ports, on a stock ecu. The car ran fine, sure the AFRs weren't ideal, and I wasn't making the most HP, but it was 99% streetable (except for the loss of torque in the low mid, and the 200-400rpm higher idle)
When you say the AFRs weren't ideal what are we talking here?

We have an issue with AFRs skyrocketing under heavy load, low RPM scenario with 5/6th ports removed (3rd gear, WOT at <3000rpm). Wondering if that is the cause and how to go about remedying it. Its on a racecar so unsure of how much of an issue this will be as wouldnt likely be that low RPM scenario very often but would be good to sort out.

Jesse
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GrossPolluter
General Rotary Tech Support
7
May 9, 2014 11:57 AM
4pistonkiller
Naturally Aspirated Performance Forum
12
Apr 12, 2011 10:15 PM
CrackHeadMel
Naturally Aspirated Performance Forum
19
Jan 4, 2008 02:18 PM
drschwinn2002
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
5
Jul 16, 2007 03:40 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:55 AM.