13B-RE in FC
1 Attachment(s)
Almost done swapping a 13B-RE into my FC. This was such a headache I should have just stuck with an s5 engine. I particularly like the bit where the heater core hose comes right out into the throttle body where the cables attach.
No real point to this, just venting. Attachment 748602 |
Ultimate swap IMHO :worship:
|
it was only pointless of swapping if you keep it under 450hp, shoot for 600 son!
|
1 Attachment(s)
Almost ready to fire it up. Still not sure the best way to approach the intake piping here, and also need to figure out the throttle cable / cruise control situation.
Attachment 748601 |
Originally Posted by lastphaseofthis
(Post 12317272)
it was only pointless of swapping if you keep it under 450hp, shoot for 600 son!
|
Lookin' good!
|
Nice looking swap, let us know when you get her running. What exhaust manifold are you running?
|
1 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by Mlammert
(Post 12317385)
Nice looking swap, let us know when you get her running. What exhaust manifold are you running?
Attachment 748591 |
That looks like the GReddy one to me, I think I can almost see the logo cast into it. I really like how far up it pushes the turbo, thanks.
https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.rx7...79043dcbe3.png |
Its def the hks, not greddy
http://www.rotaryshack.com/Products/...tManifold1.jpg
Originally Posted by Mlammert
(Post 12317569)
That looks like the GReddy one to me, I think I can almost see the logo cast into it. I really like how far up it pushes the turbo, thanks.
|
Originally Posted by nyt
(Post 12317732)
|
Originally Posted by Mlammert
(Post 12317788)
Didn't know HKS made one like that. Thanks for the correction.
Time to go outside in the below freezing weather and try to get this starter working. Got the car ready to start yesterday and apparently the starter didn't want to engage after sitting for 10 years. |
Originally Posted by nyt
(Post 12317329)
Almost ready to fire it up. Still not sure the best way to approach the intake piping here, and also need to figure out the throttle cable / cruise control situation.
https://i.imgur.com/lBHgMrl.jpg For the throttle cable, you can use a S5 non-turbo cable. It'll have a pretty sharp bend coming out of the firewall, but I've seen it work. I used the S5 TII throttle cable but looped backwards, compared to the OEM direction. Worked fine. For the intake piping, either upgrade to the FD throttle body and get a Greddy throttle body elbow. Or stick with the 13BRE throttle body and use the OEM elbow. Have a welder make a pipe for what you're missing. The rest is straight forward. Here was my setup on my old S5 TII: https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.rx7...885e3f5168.jpg |
2 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by Jaiyurai
(Post 12318030)
The 13BRE isn't that different from the 13BT and REW motors. I had one in my car and if you know what to do, then you can use many of the stock and aftermarket parts from the BT/REW engines.
For the throttle cable, you can use a S5 non-turbo cable. It'll have a pretty sharp bend coming out of the firewall, but I've seen it work. I used the S5 TII throttle cable but looped backwards, compared to the OEM direction. Worked fine. For the intake piping, either upgrade to the FD throttle body and get a Greddy throttle body elbow. Or stick with the 13BRE throttle body and use the OEM elbow. Have a welder make a pipe for what you're missing. The rest is straight forward. Here was my setup on my old S5 TII: got the starter fixed, but this wolf ems does not want to work with ref/sync mode even though i verified signal is good at the ecu.. ugh. Attachment 748572 old setup Attachment 748573 |
1 Attachment(s)
brought pickups in closer to the teeth and am in business. car is running. Unfortunately, have a small oil drip from the tstat in the cooler and my leading ignition isn't firing....
tracked it down to the 6a.. pulled it apart and instantly smelled the magic smoke that was left inside... replacement gets here in a couple days. Attachment 748554 |
Originally Posted by nyt
(Post 12318396)
brought pickups in closer to the teeth and am in business. car is running. Unfortunately, have a small oil drip from the tstat in the cooler and my leading ignition isn't firing....
tracked it down to the 6a.. pulled it apart and instantly smelled the magic smoke that was left inside... replacement gets here in a couple days. https://i.imgur.com/IeTltAY.png |
1 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by Mlammert
(Post 12318651)
I have one in the same spot. I replaced the crush washer several times only to discover a hairline crack in the bung welded to the oil cooler body the big bolt/thermostat holder goes in. Hows the 13B-RE lower intake manifold compare to the S4/5 one? It looks very similar but I'm guessing the runners are larger?
Attachment 748545 |
holy shit that really is something!
|
4 Attachment(s)
msd 6a arrived. I also got one of the ebay worley oil coolers...
https://www.ebay.com/itm/192722274757 doesn't seem awful, though I'm concerned about using an o-ring without a proper gap to seal this. Came with a t-stat. Will post more once I have it on the car, hopefully tomorrow. Attachment 748523 Attachment 748524 Attachment 748525 Attachment 748526 |
so after I got some crush washers, it turns out the threads on this are 16x1.5 instead of 18x1.5
have to order a tap as all I have are thread chasers in that size. |
Originally Posted by nyt
(Post 12318653)
larger runners. the port size difference is huge. This is 13BT vs 13B-RE. The 13BT is even ported out a bit, but they're still dwarfed.
https://i.imgur.com/SBaOKEy.jpg |
Originally Posted by Dak
(Post 12319269)
Well that settles it. I had already thought I wanted my next engine to be a REW but after seeing the difference in port size I think my mind's made up. I know that is the RE and not the REW but REW's seem easier to find now even though the RE would be easier to mount( from what I read anyway)
the port is misleading, the RE ports are angled angled up to give more room for the turbos, like the FD. so instead of looking at a vertical slice through the port, its at an angle, it makes them look enormous, but its not a huge difference |
Originally Posted by j9fd3s
(Post 12319286)
the RE is easier to mount for sure, and the FC cas, water pump, and wiring harness go right on and work, so its a nice swap. FD is much harder, because everything fits less well.
the port is misleading, the RE ports are angled angled up to give more room for the turbos, like the FD. so instead of looking at a vertical slice through the port, its at an angle, it makes them look enormous, but its not a huge difference |
This swap was definitely a PITA for me as well... My old convertible with the swap. This was about 10 year ago, but I'm pretty sure I used an NA throttle cable. No cruise control though. Same exhaust manifold with a 60-1 turbo.
https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.rx7...f4afdd4b1d.jpg https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.rx7...6d54125397.jpg |
Originally Posted by Dak
(Post 12319420)
I hope to be on a standalone by the time I need another engine anyway but does this mean if I'm running my 6-port on say a Haltech elite the harness I'm using would swap right over to the RE? I had figured I might just get the PnP FD harness from Haltech when the time came to swap. I think the stock twins will work fine for my power goals so It'll be one of these two engines regardless, though unless I just find a smokin' deal on an RE I'd say I'll stick with the REW.
oh, the TPS.... you'll need to change the connector on that for sure. Not a big deal. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:02 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands