17x10 +0?
 

I might be picking up a pair of meshies in this size and I was if anyone has any pictures of a similar size mounted in the rear.

you will need a roll/pull to fit them im almost positive...

im going with 17x10 -52 so i cant help much...

17x10 -52? wow! any pics?

Roll and pull for sure. That's a stupid offset for such narrow wheels.

Take it to PM's.

they will stick out maybe a inch?? depending on tire size you may need a lot of rolling and pulling

its called widening the stance of the car.

and yeah if you want pictures just search my name i have a build thread.

BTW if your sticking out an inch or more i would suggest wider fenders. i have seen a lot of stock fenders being pulled to the point where they buckle and cause dents higher up.

I'm expecting lots of pull, I just want to know if it's possible with stock quarters. And if available pictures would help. I really, really don't want to have to go widebody even though I probably should.


Looked at your build thread and you're an idiot. Why wouldn't you get a wheel that fills the whole wheel well insted of one that will fit under stock body but with a fucked up offset.

I'm pretty certain they will not fit without overs or some SERIOUS pulling... I have 18x9.5 with a +27 offset and they are pretty flush



http://i245.photobucket.com/albums/g...y/P3150075.jpg

http://im1.shutterfly.com/media/47b9...D550/ry%3D400/


unpossible.

Oh hey, I know you :P

yes... sunburn is my alter-ego... I have to dumb myself down to participate on most threads on this forum.

-52 and +0 will not work for an FC if you going 9.5 or higher...

you should stay around +25... for 9.5 width or higher.

i have 18x10 +24 in the rear.

:lol:

oh these ? i remember them lol

good luck making them fit, i cant do it with a bodykit 3 inches wider on each side

http://www.mazda-speed.com/albums/b005td/IMG_1720.jpg

http://www.mazda-speed.com/albums/b005td/IMG_1728.jpg

well im making them fit.

and to turbo II rotor.

to each his own. im not going to go with a 17x14" wheel. and the works will still look good.

some would say fitting the 17x10 +0 on stock fenders is retarded.

and sub9lulu i have already test fitted the wheels on the car and taken my measurements and 3 inches in the rear of the car will fit these wheels. the front is a little harder.

holy wheel bearings Batman!

Here is my 17x10 et12 they fit but i cant see a et0 fitting without a major stretch .
http://i92.photobucket.com/albums/l7...testfit004.jpg
http://i92.photobucket.com/albums/l7...testfit003.jpg
http://i92.photobucket.com/albums/l7...testfit001.jpg
hope that helps .

^ needs way more camber.

future RS: Its such weird sizing, hope you pull it off

turbo II rotor: oh shit son, your thinking of running 17x10 et0 on stock metal without looking like shit? your gonna need to stretch lol OH NOES

i will if it takes a year :)

dont tell him he needs to streatch! he might get skeered. he hates camber too!
im surprised he is going to have mismatched wheels...

must be hard being a hater.

It appears we have very different definitions of "fitting". :scratch:

Well, fitting is a loose term.

http://bikehugger.com/images/blog/fa...andex-1-01.jpg

Just raise the rear up a ton so they don't rub.

raising your car is the gayest thing to say/do.

Forgot the sarcasm smiley. I think putting huge wide rims without either having that much power or a wide body is pretty gay too.

exactly.

unless its a dedicated track car and you need to hold a 255 or higher tire.

my question to turbo II rotor is if your car is a drift car why do you need so much rubber back there unless your stretching the tires?

gt42r's usually put out a pretty healthy amount of power. 225s wont cut here bud.