Results From Pinion Gear Change
If it weren't for money, :rlaugh: I would love to try the highest pinion gear there is available ( a 5something ) to see if it would either be:
1) a total throttle response shift as fast as you can 0-100 MPH quick but short-legged blast OR 2) waste TOO much time spending all the time shifting and making me wish I had different tranny gearing. Does anybody know about the results from a much higher ( than 3.909 or 4.1 ) pinion gear ? Please share. I'm about to start the rebuild on that 84 GSL rearend I got and if I ever make a ring and pinion change, now would be the time. |
I run a 4.88 in the racecar. Tops out at about 140. I would like a 4.44 for the street, or the 4.88 with taller tires. The racecar pulls really hard, very torquey feel. Yes you will shift more with that gear, especially on the street.
|
Many moons ago a buddy I grew up with had a Rx3 wagon with a Bridgeport and a 5:1 rear gear. The factory paint was a little faded and it had wood grain down the side of it. Stock 13" steel wheels. Man what a sleeper.
We use to go out and play with all the guys with their mustangs and vettes. That thing would leave the line so hard it would through you back in the seat and would pull like that up until about 70 MPH. By that time we would have left who ever - waaaaay back. They would be so pissed that a piece of crap wagon would leave them like that. After a while people knew about the "Red POS wagon that would not idle". -billy |
I have 4.875s (aka 4.88s) in my daily driver. In fact, I just returned from a 2,400 mile round trip to Fontana, CA (Grand Am Cup race) and Las Vegas, NV (SEMA Show) in the car. Apart from the 25% speedo error and the rather high cruising RPM, it's really no big deal. The high gears really wake the car up, making it feel more torquey...25% more torquey, in fact. ;) Yes, I do shift a lot more now but I actually enjoy working the gears. It certainly has given me a lot more opportunities to practice heal and toe downshifts. Fuel economy is down slightly, but not as much as you'd think. If anything, the lower fuel economy can be attributed to an increased willingness to step hard on the throttle coming out of corners...the added pep is addictive. I still get 20+ mpg on the freeway, even cruising at 5,000 rpm in 5th gear (~85mph). :)
|
That sounds like what I'm after. Wouldn't happen to have a "spare" lying around would you ? Where do I get one of these tall gears without paying the price of a rebuild for just the parts ?
|
BTW, lower gear sets are not necessarily all that expensive. Brand new, the 4.88s are only about $285 through Mazdaspeed (at least they were, last time I checked). I actually bought mine slightly used (<1000 miles) for $100 a few years ago. All in all, I think they are a wonderful investment.
|
Thanks for the info. I'm officially looking !
|
There's junkyard gearsets available...
Front Diff of early/mid 80's 4wd Mazda truck: 4.44:1 1994+5 speed Miata: 4.30:1 (Added bonus of a Torsen that should fit 84/85 RX-7's) Kia Sportage: 4.88:1 I believe the Honda S2000 also has a Mazda compatible diff in it... Not sure on the gear ratio... I love it when car manufacturers deligate adn farm out work to one another. :D |
i had a 4.88 and loved it till i ate my thrid member up. Now im back to stock LSD. I might do a gear change soon, but who doesnt like going 150? :D
|
Originally Posted by Pele
1994+5 speed Miata: 4.30:1 (Added bonus of a Torsen that should fit 84/85 RX-7's)
|
So you're saying these chunks or ring and pinions will slide into the '84 GSL rearend ? Just like that ?
and Please... what is a torsen ? |
Originally Posted by CrazyJoe12a
The 5 speed Miata's use a 4.10, the autos get the 4.30. And the TorSen is VERY nice.
According to the VIN shipped with my junkyard Miata diff, it was a 1999 Manual, some type of special edition, green one... Front end wreck @ 58K miles. 4 and a third turns of the pinion makes one rotation of the ring.
Originally Posted by DAVID GRIMES
So you're saying these chunks or ring and pinions will slide into the '84 GSL rearend ? Just like that ?
and Please... what is a torsen ? And dig this: How Differentials Work |
Originally Posted by DAVID GRIMES
So you're saying these chunks or ring and pinions will slide into the '84 GSL rearend ? Just like that ?
and Please... what is a torsen ? Torsens are a type of Limited Slip Differential (LSD), which use gears to distribute torque between the wheels. 3rd gens come with torsen diffs, while earlier RX-7s had either clutch-type (the most common) or viscous (Series V 2nd gens only). |
ive been telling people the more gear the better, but nobody listens!!!
i had 5.13 gears on a stock 12a with headers and nothing could touch me on the street , that is until i ran out of gear, wich happens quick!! |
Originally Posted by 680RWHP12A
ive been telling people the more gear the better, but nobody listens!!!
i had 5.13 gears on a stock 12a with headers and nothing could touch me on the street , that is until i ran out of gear, wich happens quick!! |
Originally Posted by 680RWHP12A
ive been telling people the more gear the better, but nobody listens!!!
i had 5.13 gears on a stock 12a with headers and nothing could touch me on the street , that is until i ran out of gear, wich happens quick!! About the torsen: So it is a replacement for the LSD ? |
Or do I get the who;e Miata rearend WITH the torsen ?
|
Originally Posted by Blake
For non-turbos, I agree. However, I favor the 4.875s because they are a bit stronger than the 5.125s. Turbo cars, on the other hand, need the load of lower gears to help build boost, so 4.1s or 4.3s are about the practical limit.
i couldnt agree more!!! nice to see someone with knowledge on gear selection !!!!!!!!! gears can make you(on a n/a car) or break you(gears on a turbo car) |
Originally Posted by DAVID GRIMES
Or do I get the who;e Miata rearend WITH the torsen ?
torsen= lots of small worm gears that break, mazda lsd rear ends = clutch type almost indestructable!!!!! unless you put 700 h/p to them , then they break too!! also , another thing to remember the more gear you put in the rear end, the more stress it puts on the axles and third member, and........ the less stress it puts on the tranny..... |
Great ! So I keep the soon to be rebuilt '84 LSD rear with the rear disk brakes and look for a 4.88 or 5.13 ring and pinion.
Is it better to find the R&P and hassle with getting it installed or get a chunk from a rebuilder ? I might have a hard time finding somebody around here to install a R&P. |
im not sure... i have a spare 4.88 gear set for $80.00
a couple of the teeth are chipped but will work fine, let me know if you want them... i would use them but all my cars are turbo............ getting the 3 rd member assembled shouldnt cost more than $100.00,,,, tops |
I will see if there's any local talent. If so, I'm liable to take you up on that.
Who does that type of work ( in your area anyway ) ? |
me... free assembly for forum members... you pay shipping , of course.......
i will need a stock lsd core unless you pay for the core........ |
Originally Posted by 680RWHP12A
me... free assembly for forum members... you pay shipping , of course.......
i will need a stock lsd core unless you pay for the core........ Okay.. so there's a spacer on the pinion... it's available in 4 or 5 different thicknesses each varying by a tenth or so of a millimeter... How do you decide which one you need? Assemble, put paint on the pinion, see where paint hits the ring? Or throw it together, drive on it, and if it makes bad noise, tear it down and retry again? I think I've asked this a million times, but either I can never get a good answer or nobody answers, or I just fucking forget to check for an answer or what the answer was or something. |
Originally Posted by 680RWHP12A
me... free assembly for forum members... you pay shipping , of course.......
i will need a stock lsd core unless you pay for the core........ You West coast guys have no idea how hard it is to even SEE another RX-7 in the Southest unless it's bone stock and run down. The Mazda dealership is helpful with parts, but they have zero mechanics that will even think about touching a 1st gen Rex even for non-engine work. |
Originally Posted by Pele
Ah. You do this... You know what you're doing.
Okay.. so there's a spacer on the pinion... it's available in 4 or 5 different thicknesses each varying by a tenth or so of a millimeter... How do you decide which one you need? Assemble, put paint on the pinion, see where paint hits the ring? Or throw it together, drive on it, and if it makes bad noise, tear it down and retry again? I think I've asked this a million times, but either I can never get a good answer or nobody answers, or I just fucking forget to check for an answer or what the answer was or something. well i usally re-use the spacer, but i always purchase a new crush sleeve... thats how you set the backlash...once you torque it down, you can't re-use it..... to set the depth you raise or lower and move in/out the ring gear via the adjusters on the ring gear side bearings... |
Originally Posted by Pele
Ah. You do this... You know what you're doing.
Okay.. so there's a spacer on the pinion... it's available in 4 or 5 different thicknesses each varying by a tenth or so of a millimeter... How do you decide which one you need? Assemble, put paint on the pinion, see where paint hits the ring? Or throw it together, drive on it, and if it makes bad noise, tear it down and retry again? I think I've asked this a million times, but either I can never get a good answer or nobody answers, or I just fucking forget to check for an answer or what the answer was or something. |
yah, i use an ultra low torque wrench, it works great!!
|
Ultra low torgue wrench ? As in inch ounces instead of foot pounds ?
|
Originally Posted by 680RWHP12A
me... free assembly for forum members... you pay shipping , of course.......
i will need a stock lsd core unless you pay for the core........ I will be there this weekend. |
Originally Posted by DAVID GRIMES
Ultra low torgue wrench ? As in inch ounces instead of foot pounds ?
Yes. Look in the FSM and read the procedure. |
Originally Posted by wackyracer
I will be there this weekend.
no problem, you buy lunch!! |
Will any of the junkyard options mentioned on the first page work with the earlier '81-'83 diffs?
I'd totally dig a set of 4.44's for my '79, that'd give me the extra kick I need to totally annihilate my buddies Supra. :devil: |
Interesting stuff. I am putting 3.73's in mine. I want to be able to highway cruise the car below 3000 RPM.
|
Originally Posted by MosesX605
Will any of the junkyard options mentioned on the first page work with the earlier '81-'83 diffs?
I'd totally dig a set of 4.44's for my '79, that'd give me the extra kick I need to totally annihilate my buddies Supra. :devil: They should fit no problem since the pinion flange from an early diff fits an FB one. |
Originally Posted by Directfreak
Interesting stuff. I am putting 3.73's in mine. I want to be able to highway cruise the car below 3000 RPM.
Hell, if you're wanting to go that way, just go to a slightly taller tire on the back and call it a day. ;) Damn shame you can't put a SUPER DUTY STEERING QUICKENER in-line ( reversiblefor more or less turns per rev ) between the propellor shaft and the third member !!! :rlaugh: Hmmm... ( wheels in head whirring thinking about wheels on car whirring ) |
i'm not sure, but is the automatic rear end/differential actually lower than the GSL-SE 3.90? like when your cruising @ 60mph the rpm's will be @ 2500 rather than the SE's 2800-2850 or the GSL's 3000 rpm cruising?? someone correct me if i'm wrong here. also will the automatic diffenretial work/fit in the gsl-se differential housing?
|
I'm not the authority n SE's, but I believe the 3.909 was shared between man and auto on the other models. The effective difference is the tranny gears... automatic 2.458, 1.458, and 1.000... manual 3.674, 2.217, 1.432, 1.000, and .825.
The manual tranny's fifth gear should yield the lowest cruising rpm's if the tire/wheel height is the same on the comparison cars. |
i have a feeling it's the auto diff. that will actually yield the lowest rpm cruise rate say 60mph
|
Could I put 4.88 gears in my 79 diff? What all would I need for the swap?
Sorry, kind of noobie questions but I really want to do this. Thanks |
Originally Posted by DAVID GRIMES
Dude !!! Going shorter r&p gear ( from 3.909 to 3.73 ) is pretty minimal. Don't expect alot. Just like going taller to 4.11 ain't much at all either. Each to his own, but I would only MAYBE make that small a change if I was trying to correct final gear ratio to get back to stock so the speedo wouldn't lie. Probably wouldn't do it, though. :(
Hell, if you're wanting to go that way, just go to a slightly taller tire on the back and call it a day. ;) 62 MPH to 67 MPH with the same size tire. Since I WILL be putting on taller tires to boot, it will make an even larger difference to gearing. Check out the Attached RPM/Tranny/Gearing calculator I have attached. It is currently setup for my car with the 87-88 Turbo II tranny. It will help everyone here figure out how high in MPH each gear can get too. EDIT: It's too large to attach, can anybody host it? It's a 427KB Excel file. |
Originally Posted by Directfreak
EDIT: It's too large to attach, can anybody host it? It's a 427KB Excel file. |
I like to use this gear calculator. Works good and is easy to use.
http://www.race-technology.com/WebPa...lculation.html |
1 Attachment(s)
Over the years, I developed a pretty slick Excel spreadsheet for comparring up to four setups simultaneously. There is also reference data (common RX-7 transmission ratios) and a Ring and Pinion chart, showing all combos. Check it out:
RPMSpeed.XLS.zip https://www.rx7club.com/forum/attach...id=82370&stc=1 |
Very nice, Blake. :)
My only gripe is that most of these calculators do not allow you to put in ALL the variables to determine EXACTLY what results are possible or likely. Somebody could get the impression that with super tall tires and gearing changes on a stock 12A that 200 mph is possible. You would need to factor in the hp and torque curves at different RPM levels, coefficient of drag, parasitic loss of accessories or gain from removing them, and on and on. They are great for comparison to move the user at least in the direction they are trying to go. IMO too many people don't have a clear idea of what they are trying to achieve. What is the purpose of the car. Are you going for an 1/8 mile car ? 1/4 mile ? redlight to redlight beast ? rally ? drifting ? land speed record ? or just drive daily with a little extra so civics don't embarrass you ? All require very different and critical setups to be able to do the desired thing really well. But for sure, no one car can do it all ! |
Hey that's the same one I have!
Nice Job Blake, - On the copy I had I went ahead and put the Turbo II gearing to help get an idea of the rear ends gearing that I was leaning to. Now I know I can hit almost 70 mph by redlining 2nd gear. :) Here Guys, Use this to enter YOUR setup into the Calculator: US SPEC MAZDA DRIVELINE RATIOS *** FIRST GENERATION *** ……………………………………………………………….…….………………………………..AXLE..FINAL.TIRE......TIRE..ENGINE VEH.. YEAR. 1ST.. 2ND...3RD.. 4TH...5TH...RATIO RATIO SIZE……....RPM...RPM @ 60 MPH RX-7. 79-83 3.674 2.218 1.433 1.000 0.825 3.909 3.227 185/70-13 892...2878 RX-7. 83-83 3.674 2.218 1.433 1.000 0.825 3.909 3.227 195/60-14 891...2875 AUTO. 84-84 2.458 1.458 1.000 0.720 N/A...3.909 3.909 185/70-13 892...3487 GSLSE 84-84 3.622 2.186 1.419 1.000 0.758 4.083 3.097 205/60-14 878...2719 RX-7. 84-84 3.622 2.186 1.419 1.000 0.807 3.933 3.175 185/70-13 892...2832 RX-7. 85-85 3.622 2.186 1.419 1.000 0.807 3.909 3.156 185/70-13 892...2815 GSLSE 85-85 3.622 2.186 1.419 1.000 0.715 4.077 2.914 205/60-14 851...2480 RX-7. 85-85 3.622 2.186 1.419 1.000 0.697 4.444 3.099 205/55-14 910...2820 *** SECOND GENERATION *** ……………………………………………………………….…….………………………………..AXLE..FINAL.TIRE......TIRE..ENGINE VEH.. YEAR. 1ST.. 2ND...3RD.. 4TH...5TH...RATIO RATIO SIZE……....RPM...RPM @ 60 MPH Base. 86-91 3.476 2.002 1.366 1.000 0.711 4.100 2.917 185/70-14 855...2494 GXL.. 87-91 3.476 2.002 1.366 1.000 0.697 4.100 2.859 205/60-15 841...2404 Turbo 87-91 3.483 2.015 1.391 1.000 0.719 4.100 2.948 205/55-16 828...2441 Conv. 88-91 GTUs. 89-91 3.476 2.002 1.366 1.000 0.758 4.300 3.261 205/55-16 828...2700 *** THIRD GENERATION *** ……………………………………………………………….…….………………………………..AXLE..FINAL.TIRE......TIRE..ENGINE VEH.. YEAR. 1ST.. 2ND...3RD.. 4TH...5TH...RATIO RATIO SIZE……....RPM...RPM @ 60 MPH (FD). 93-95 3.483 2.015 1.391 1.000 0.719 4.100 2.948 225/50-16 829...2444 |
Originally Posted by DAVID GRIMES
IMO too many people don't have a clear idea of what they are trying to achieve. What is the purpose of the car. Are you going for an 1/8 mile car ? 1/4 mile ? redlight to redlight beast ? rally ? drifting ? land speed record ? or just drive daily with a little extra so civics don't embarrass you ?
All require very different and critical setups to be able to do the desired thing really well. But for sure, no one car can do it all ! You forgot to mention AutoX and Road Racing. You may need a different gear every weekend to match the a certain course or track you are on. With autocrossing you can't even really know what gear you need until you are there walking the course. Then a lot times you can carry more speed or you need to go slower than you thought when walking the course. So you don't know which gear you need until you have made a run or two. I love it. Not that I have ever changed a rear end to suit a certain course but you can at least theorize about it. |
Originally Posted by Directfreak
RX-7. 85-85 3.622 2.186 1.419 1.000 0.697 4.444 3.099 205/55-14 910...2820
|
Originally Posted by DAVID GRIMES
My only gripe is that most of these calculators do not allow you to put in ALL the variables to determine EXACTLY what results are possible or likely.
Somebody could get the impression that with super tall tires and gearing changes on a stock 12A that 200 mph is possible. You would need to factor in the hp and torque curves at different RPM levels, coefficient of drag, parasitic loss of accessories or gain from removing them, and on and on. But, you missed the biggest fault of the calculator: it only accounts for nominal values. Tires, in particular, are never the nominal size in reality, and they wear over time. The actual (starting) size can be determined by the manufacturer's specification of "revs per mile". For example, a Bridgestone SO2 in 205/55R16 has a revs per mile specification of 833, while a Yokohama AVS Sport in the same size is 836. Regardless -- and again -- such matters are outside the scope of my calculator. I'm just going for "good enough" to decide "do want a 4.88 rear end gear?", or "if I get the 4.88, should I swap over to a GSL-SE transmission with a taller 5th gear?", or "what will happen if I go from a 185/70R13 to a 205/55R16?". These kind of questions inspired me to create the spreadsheet and continue to refine it to test multiple cases. I have no interest in delving into matters that would require a physics degree and still not give you an accurate number (too many variables!). I might as well create a drivetrain loss calculator to figure out BHP from WHP...I'd be rich! |
Originally Posted by Directfreak
Hey that's the same one I have!
Nice Job Blake, - On the copy I had I went ahead and put the Turbo II gearing to help get an idea of the rear ends gearing that I was leaning to. Now I know I can hit almost 70 mph by redlining 2nd gear. :) Here Guys, Use this to enter YOUR setup into the Calculator: <snipped> |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:14 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands