Got a 6-port question for you all!!!!
Got a 6-port question for you all!!!!
Is there anything literally "bad" about having the 6-ports stay closed, like, harmful or anything. I know it takes away about 15hp, but other than that, is there any negatives????
Yep, it'll be fine... I prefer low end torque at 3000 rpm to a couple of horses at 6500 anyway, at least when i'm just driving around town. My actuators are off right now, with the valves wired closed(until tomorrow when the entire 6 port assembly comes out
). You could wire them open for that extra hp at high rpms, but to me the loss of low end makes it not worth it.
~Jesse
). You could wire them open for that extra hp at high rpms, but to me the loss of low end makes it not worth it. ~Jesse
Originally posted by skibum9199
Yep, it'll be fine... I prefer low end torque at 3000 rpm to a couple of horses at 6500 anyway, at least when i'm just driving around town. My actuators are off right now, with the valves wired closed(until tomorrow when the entire 6 port assembly comes out
). You could wire them open for that extra hp at high rpms, but to me the loss of low end makes it not worth it.
Yep, it'll be fine... I prefer low end torque at 3000 rpm to a couple of horses at 6500 anyway, at least when i'm just driving around town. My actuators are off right now, with the valves wired closed(until tomorrow when the entire 6 port assembly comes out
). You could wire them open for that extra hp at high rpms, but to me the loss of low end makes it not worth it. Yep.. just fine. Completely removing the actuators is probably the best option, as it gives even more high end, and gives back a little low end. Once you REALLY mod your n/a, the 6p's become a restriction, so removing them helps even more.
-Tesla
Tesla, this comment is made in good cheer.......lets see now, Mazda put on the aux port actuators to take away the low end and while they were at it had it take away the top end also? Or did I misread again?(probably).
Ya, removing the 6 ports are the ONLY way to go if you've done a lot to your 7 (lots more flow)... I had no low end torque anyways, so I figured I might as well take em right out. DAMN!!! It made a huge difference, and it feels a lot more natural.. (hard to explain, but the power curve feels more linear) I also removed the ACV and A/P at the same time... but I'm sure I can contribute the gobs of extra power at 5500-8500 to the sleeves being gone....
Originally posted by HAILERS
Tesla, this comment is made in good cheer.......lets see now, Mazda put on the aux port actuators to take away the low end and while they were at it had it take away the top end also? Or did I misread again?(probably).
Tesla, this comment is made in good cheer.......lets see now, Mazda put on the aux port actuators to take away the low end and while they were at it had it take away the top end also? Or did I misread again?(probably).
Having them close is of course better for low end only...but if you get crazy, low end loses it's meaning anyway..
-Tesla
Trending Topics
This argument comes up in every auxilary port post.
Until sometime shows me real proof, I tend to believe that Mazda didn't add all that extra junk for nothing, and the car will run best with the system working as it should.
Most of what I hear is just reguritated crap that other forum members said. Remember, just because you read it here doesn't mean its true kiddies.
Until sometime shows me real proof, I tend to believe that Mazda didn't add all that extra junk for nothing, and the car will run best with the system working as it should.
Most of what I hear is just reguritated crap that other forum members said. Remember, just because you read it here doesn't mean its true kiddies.
Originally posted by Suparslinc
This argument comes up in every auxilary port post.
Until sometime shows me real proof, I tend to believe that Mazda didn't add all that extra junk for nothing, and the car will run best with the system working as it should.
Most of what I hear is just reguritated crap that other forum members said. Remember, just because you read it here doesn't mean its true kiddies.
This argument comes up in every auxilary port post.
Until sometime shows me real proof, I tend to believe that Mazda didn't add all that extra junk for nothing, and the car will run best with the system working as it should.
Most of what I hear is just reguritated crap that other forum members said. Remember, just because you read it here doesn't mean its true kiddies.
Were not talking about stock cars here. Were talking about very modded n/a's, some making 40% more hp than stock(like me). After a few mods, the 6 port sleeves become more of a restriction everywhere, and hurt hp. Removing them frees up some hp, and makes the engine have a lot better top end. Also simplifies it quite a bit.
Yes Mazda did put them on there for a reason, to give *stock* n/a's more low end, while still having a good top end. Once the mods stack up, and the hp climbs, theyre nothing more than a restriction. Also, who really worries about low end when you want a fast rotary anyways? And I bet my car has more low end than a stock n/a, and a hell of a lot more top end. I have a lot of mods, including reomved 6 port sleeves.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Adaptronic S5 Turbo PNP Unit questions
_Tones_
Adaptronic Engine Mgmt - AUS
10
May 25, 2021 05:37 AM
Nosferatu
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
7
Sep 5, 2015 02:13 PM



