2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

Got a 6-port question for you all!!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 26, 2001 | 02:52 AM
  #1  
FC3AZ's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
From: Peoria, AZ
Got a 6-port question for you all!!!!

Is there anything literally "bad" about having the 6-ports stay closed, like, harmful or anything. I know it takes away about 15hp, but other than that, is there any negatives????
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2001 | 09:09 AM
  #2  
Suparslinc's Avatar
It's Back!
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,049
Likes: 1
From: Cincinnati
no the car will run fine without them.
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2001 | 10:18 AM
  #3  
skibum9199's Avatar
college student
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
From: Toledo, OH
Yep, it'll be fine... I prefer low end torque at 3000 rpm to a couple of horses at 6500 anyway, at least when i'm just driving around town. My actuators are off right now, with the valves wired closed(until tomorrow when the entire 6 port assembly comes out). You could wire them open for that extra hp at high rpms, but to me the loss of low end makes it not worth it.


~Jesse
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2001 | 11:07 AM
  #4  
tesla042's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 611
Likes: 0
From: louisville, KY
Originally posted by skibum9199
Yep, it'll be fine... I prefer low end torque at 3000 rpm to a couple of horses at 6500 anyway, at least when i'm just driving around town. My actuators are off right now, with the valves wired closed(until tomorrow when the entire 6 port assembly comes out). You could wire them open for that extra hp at high rpms, but to me the loss of low end makes it not worth it.

Yep.. just fine. Completely removing the actuators is probably the best option, as it gives even more high end, and gives back a little low end. Once you REALLY mod your n/a, the 6p's become a restriction, so removing them helps even more.

-Tesla
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2001 | 03:09 PM
  #5  
HAILERS's Avatar
HAILERS
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 20,563
Likes: 27
From: FORT WORTH, TEXAS,USA
Tesla, this comment is made in good cheer.......lets see now, Mazda put on the aux port actuators to take away the low end and while they were at it had it take away the top end also? Or did I misread again?(probably).
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2001 | 03:51 PM
  #6  
Bambam7's Avatar
I came, I saw, I boosted.
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,921
Likes: 0
From: Windsor, Ontario, Canada
Ya, removing the 6 ports are the ONLY way to go if you've done a lot to your 7 (lots more flow)... I had no low end torque anyways, so I figured I might as well take em right out. DAMN!!! It made a huge difference, and it feels a lot more natural.. (hard to explain, but the power curve feels more linear) I also removed the ACV and A/P at the same time... but I'm sure I can contribute the gobs of extra power at 5500-8500 to the sleeves being gone....
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2001 | 10:03 PM
  #7  
tesla042's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 611
Likes: 0
From: louisville, KY
Originally posted by HAILERS
Tesla, this comment is made in good cheer.......lets see now, Mazda put on the aux port actuators to take away the low end and while they were at it had it take away the top end also? Or did I misread again?(probably).
What I mean is that completely removing the ports is better than tying them open, for both low and high end. You gain a little over tying them open in both the high and low end because the airflow is smoother than with the port in. I hear the low end gain is small, but noticeable. Plus, it's more crap to get out of your engine bay!

Having them close is of course better for low end only...but if you get crazy, low end loses it's meaning anyway..

-Tesla
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2001 | 11:38 PM
  #8  
Suparslinc's Avatar
It's Back!
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,049
Likes: 1
From: Cincinnati
This argument comes up in every auxilary port post.
Until sometime shows me real proof, I tend to believe that Mazda didn't add all that extra junk for nothing, and the car will run best with the system working as it should.
Most of what I hear is just reguritated crap that other forum members said. Remember, just because you read it here doesn't mean its true kiddies.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2001 | 01:34 AM
  #9  
mazdaspeed7's Avatar
mad scientist
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,665
Likes: 2
From: Savannah, GA
Originally posted by Suparslinc
This argument comes up in every auxilary port post.
Until sometime shows me real proof, I tend to believe that Mazda didn't add all that extra junk for nothing, and the car will run best with the system working as it should.
Most of what I hear is just reguritated crap that other forum members said. Remember, just because you read it here doesn't mean its true kiddies.

Were not talking about stock cars here. Were talking about very modded n/a's, some making 40% more hp than stock(like me). After a few mods, the 6 port sleeves become more of a restriction everywhere, and hurt hp. Removing them frees up some hp, and makes the engine have a lot better top end. Also simplifies it quite a bit.

Yes Mazda did put them on there for a reason, to give *stock* n/a's more low end, while still having a good top end. Once the mods stack up, and the hp climbs, theyre nothing more than a restriction. Also, who really worries about low end when you want a fast rotary anyways? And I bet my car has more low end than a stock n/a, and a hell of a lot more top end. I have a lot of mods, including reomved 6 port sleeves.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
_Tones_
Adaptronic Engine Mgmt - AUS
10
May 25, 2021 05:37 AM
Nosferatu
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
7
Sep 5, 2015 02:13 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:03 PM.