RX7Club.com - Mazda RX7 Forum

RX7Club.com - Mazda RX7 Forum (https://www.rx7club.com/)
-   V-8 Powered RX-7's (https://www.rx7club.com/v-8-powered-rx-7s-299/)
-   -   v8 rx7 (https://www.rx7club.com/v-8-powered-rx-7s-299/v8-rx7-251327/)

yerlee4 12-13-03 09:23 PM

v8 rx7
 
why haven't there been much talk about the 5.0 ford motor in the 3rd generation rx7. i know the ls1 is overall better engine than the 5.0 but the prices are way different. 5.0s go for under 1g at the junk yard whlie the lowest price for a ls1 i found was $3500. with intake and heads and other things, the 5.0 can run with the ls1.

diablone 12-13-03 09:27 PM

Wow you really want to go cheap don't you? 1K on a chassis and another 1K on an engine isn't going to finish it. ;) Try the "Other Engine Conversions" section of this forum.

XSTransAm 12-13-03 09:33 PM

It wouldent be worth it to convert the 13b to a 5.0, your much better off with the wankel... That being said tho I wouldent convert it to anything, the wankel is what makes this car so unique.

BrianK 12-13-03 09:43 PM

I believe it has to do with size. The Ford motor is too tall to fit under the FD's hood.

yerlee4 12-13-03 11:18 PM

okay thats the answer i was looking for.

yerlee4 12-14-03 03:05 AM

okay, even though you answer my first question i have another. can someone give me a website address were some did do this swap?

turbogarrett 12-15-03 09:41 PM

check out torquecentral.com in the v8rx7 forums. the 5.0 seems to be a popular swap with the 1st gens. it can be mounted in any gen, but like it was said before it is too tall and would require a hood scoop or you could bust out the sawzall and go with the "trailerpark" air cleaner sticking out of the hood:)

TOUGHGUY 12-18-03 09:24 AM

The attractiveness of the 302 and 5.0, other than brand loyalty, is in its thinwall design. Physicaly, a SBF is marginaly narrower and shorter than a SBC. Contrary to popular belief, the overall height of a SBF is about the same as a SBC due to Ford`s general use of lower profile air cleaners and EFI intakes. The SBC is however, about 1.5 inches shorter from the oil pan to valve cover than a SBF. What the thinwall design achieves is the overall weight of the engine assembly is more than a hundred pounds lighter for a Ford than a Chevy without loss of structural integrity. Ford`s placement of the distributor at the front of the engine also makes it attractive for tight fits into smaller cars such as the RX7 where firewall modifications are usualy avoided.

I like Chevys just as much as Fords because they are cheaper and more abundant but the old addage that it takes a 350 to beat a 302 isn`t just an old wives` tale!

Toughguy :)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:08 PM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands