A few questions.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-12-17, 05:13 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
scheherazade's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: DC area
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A few questions.

If replacing an already LS1 swapped FD with an LS3, is it plug and play?
Does an LS3 require a different ECU than an LS1 (not referring to tuning, but the ECU itself)? (I assume it just needs a tune?)

For new swaps, do folks prefer to use standalone, or a stock Chevy ECU (because OBD2)? Is either considered an all right way to go?

I found references to the serpentine belt pattern, corvette (wide+short) vs Camaro (narrow+tall), and some people saying you should use the Camaro pattern.
Is the Camaro pattern required, or just easier?

Various swaps use different swap kits. I see many require just a tiny push into the firewall to fit the motor. Then I saw one swap where the motor is recessed really far back, only half of it visible inside the engine bay. Is there a reason to heavily recess the engine? (Trans shifter fitment? weight balance?)

Thanks,
-scheherazade
Old 12-13-17, 09:18 AM
  #2  
Senior Member

 
ZDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Pawtucket, RI
Posts: 682
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Most use GM ECU, I have an LS3 with LS2 GTO ECU.

If you haven't been to norotors.com, get thee there and search around a bit, there's a lot more V8-swapped RX-7 info there.
Old 12-15-17, 09:41 AM
  #3  
Full Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Esser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Evansville, IN
Posts: 163
Received 40 Likes on 18 Posts
Originally Posted by scheherazade
If replacing an already LS1 swapped FD with an LS3, is it plug and play?
Does an LS3 require a different ECU than an LS1 (not referring to tuning, but the ECU itself)? (I assume it just needs a tune?)

For new swaps, do folks prefer to use standalone, or a stock Chevy ECU (because OBD2)? Is either considered an all right way to go?

I found references to the serpentine belt pattern, corvette (wide+short) vs Camaro (narrow+tall), and some people saying you should use the Camaro pattern.
Is the Camaro pattern required, or just easier?

Various swaps use different swap kits. I see many require just a tiny push into the firewall to fit the motor. Then I saw one swap where the motor is recessed really far back, only half of it visible inside the engine bay. Is there a reason to heavily recess the engine? (Trans shifter fitment? weight balance?)

Thanks,
-scheherazade

LS3 has almost all different sensors and all plugs are different. ECU is different. You'd be better off buying a harness kit from PSI to run an LS3.

Stock GM ECU is easiest and cheapest option.

All serpentine setups will fit basically, but Fbody is most popular because it is the cheapest.

All the engine mounts sit about the same. There is only room for it in one spot plus or minus a half inch. You dont have much options for engine placement like you're thinking.
Old 12-19-17, 06:13 PM
  #4  
Junior Member
 
Lsxrex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: TX
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Easier and better to use the GM ecu. Guys can make 2000 HP daily drivable cars on the factory ecu and tune with HPT or EFILive. As for the swap wiring and sensor placement are very different between the two. Just depends if you want the DBW or cable throttle body. I prefer wire over cable for the tunability, cruise control and traction options. Also packaging is easier.
Old 12-21-17, 09:52 AM
  #5  
Fistful of steel

iTrader: (7)
 
LargeOrangeFont's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: OC, So Cal
Posts: 2,202
Received 27 Likes on 26 Posts
Your biggest problem is that the LS1 uses a 24x reluctor wheel on the crank, and the LS3 used a 58x wheel. Also LS3 is drive by wire. This means a convertor or different ECU is needed. Additionally, some of the sensors are in different places, but that is easy to fix.

Last edited by LargeOrangeFont; 12-21-17 at 10:03 AM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Malikai229
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
3
11-11-09 12:39 PM
j0rd4n
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
7
04-16-07 11:17 AM
boohame
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
3
09-20-06 11:46 PM
88durel
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
3
04-15-06 09:16 PM



Quick Reply: A few questions.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:30 AM.