RX7Club.com - Mazda RX7 Forum

RX7Club.com - Mazda RX7 Forum (https://www.rx7club.com/)
-   Suspension/Wheels/Tires/Brakes (https://www.rx7club.com/suspension-wheels-tires-brakes-20/)
-   -   The "Will These Wheels Fit" Question Eliminator 3000 (https://www.rx7club.com/suspension-wheels-tires-brakes-20/will-these-wheels-fit-question-eliminator-3000-a-560921/)

academytim 08-08-06 01:51 AM

I'm only running a 245 series tire up front. My father is running a 255. We both have stock trailing arms, 18x8.5" +45 offset.

wanklin 08-08-06 11:06 AM


Originally Posted by Eggie
you might wish to redo your example picture, which makes backspacing appear unrelated to offset.

Fixed ;o)



Originally Posted by academytim
Not exactly accurate. My father and I both run 18x10, 45mm offset, 285 series tires on the back of our stock suspensioned FD's. They fit perfect and according to that excel sheet they don't. But it is a good tool to get you down to the right area.

The tolerances have been adjusted for the rear with stock suspension. Thanks for your input.

I have emailed in the revised file, but it will not be on the server until xthephilx has a chance to post it.

Rob

xthephilx 08-08-06 12:28 PM

Updated :D

wanklin 08-08-06 01:50 PM


Originally Posted by xthephilx
Updated :D

you are the man

wanklin 11-23-06 11:04 AM

useful tool bump ^

davewarner 12-04-06 05:45 AM

Can anyone give me some advise?
I recently bought a set on new alloys ADR size 18inch 8.5J with offsets 35 & rears 9.5J with offsets 35 & was going to fit 225/40/18 tyres on front & 255/35/18 tyres on rear.
Can anyone tell me if these offset of 35 will fit my car, Mazda RX7 1993 model twin turbo.

The wheels i have on at present are 17inch 8.5JX with Offset 45 on front & 17inch 9.5JX offset 45 on rear.

I'm a little confused as some people say they fit & some say the rears are too wide.

Please help before these arrive.

Dave

rynberg 12-04-06 11:32 AM

No, they won't fit well. Offset is too low. Rolled front fenders will be a requirement. Also, proper fitment to me means more than just fitting inside the fenderwell, it also means maintaining the proper scrub radius/suspension geometry. +35 is too low of an offset for that.

The wheels you have now are damn near perfect fitment. I would stay with them. 17" tires are cheaper too. But if you want to run the ADRs you just bought, I would go with 245/35 fronts, 265/35 rears.

wanklin 12-04-06 11:44 AM

http://www.kitsunedev.com/stuff/twtwfqe3k

wanklin 02-21-07 09:46 PM

Updated Version:

https://img129.imageshack.us/img129/...00smallke0.jpg

mono4lamar 02-22-07 10:02 AM

posting so i can find this when i get home! excellent!!!

jimlab 02-22-07 11:40 AM


Originally Posted by wanklin
Eventually the spreadsheet will be able calculate diameter variances and allow you to select flare options

Will it advise you on whether or not your flares look like ass?

skatingsamurai 02-22-07 11:43 AM

hahahahaha, nice thread

wanklin 02-22-07 11:54 AM


Originally Posted by jimlab
Will it advise you on whether or not your flares look like ass?

Not yet, but I'm working on it :icon_tup:
https://img407.imageshack.us/img407/...n200704gj1.jpg

mono4lamar 02-22-07 03:28 PM

question! the front spacing and back spacing... do they always remain constant? i read the example stating only fill in the yellow areas but im just making sure. i was told that the wheels i am looking at 18x9 +35 offset with 255 all around. i was told the front end might rub a little. does the guide a full proof way to check for possible rubbing? can anyone clarify this for me?

wanklin 02-22-07 09:42 PM


Originally Posted by mono4lamar
question! the front spacing and back spacing... do they always remain constant? i read the example stating only fill in the yellow areas but im just making sure. i was told that the wheels i am looking at 18x9 +35 offset with 255 all around. i was told the front end might rub a little. does the guide a full proof way to check for possible rubbing? can anyone clarify this for me?

No, front/back spacing are a function of width and offset and you'll need to fill in these fields: It's based on proven extremes, but I'm not going to label it fool proof ;o)
https://img338.imageshack.us/img338/...ofillindm9.jpg

mono4lamar 02-22-07 10:04 PM

^ yeah yeah yeah i know i acknowledged that the sheet states the yellow boxes to be filled in. yet a respected member here told me that the fronts would rub in the front. yet the chart states the wheels will fit. so im just wondering what the chart exactly means by "fit".

wanklin 02-23-07 07:50 AM

Sorry, I misunderstood your question. There is no guarantee that the fronts won't rub, there are just too many factors that come into play once you allow the wheels to pivot. For example the 18x10 +50 CCW track package rubbed slightly on the front of Nick Y's car, while others with the identicle wheel/tire combination have not experienced rubbing. It's really a matter or ride height, spring rates, suspension variances, the way the the fenders are bolted on etc.

The spreadsheet will get the wheels to fit inside the wheel wells, but the rest is up to the individual owner. I hope that answer was sufficient.

mono4lamar 02-23-07 11:18 AM

well according to the spreadsheet the wheels will fit. think i should try my luck and stretch to 265 all around :) ? i wish the spreadsheet would let you put in tire size (hint hint). should i just get my fenders rolled or maybe get some aftermarkets with a very slight flare? the point is i want wheels i can rotate around.

DamonB 02-23-07 11:28 AM


Originally Posted by mono4lamar
i wish the spreadsheet would let you put in tire size

Wouldn't work. The actual width of the tire is never what it says on the sidewall.

mono4lamar 02-24-07 11:39 AM

ok so lets imagine i can either put 265's all around or 255's all around. what do you think the fitment would be with the BFGoodrich KDW2's? any idea what fender rolling costs? i might as well get it done...

wanklin 02-24-07 12:38 PM


Originally Posted by DamonB
Wouldn't work. The actual width of the tire is never what it says on the sidewall.

Not to mention that nominal widths are dependent on rim width, therefore 285mm tire has a different width on a 9.5" rim than it does on a 10" rim. Manufacturer tire specs, which are easily found on the tirerack website, are based on some "benchmark" rim width, but they are by no means accurate for all rims.

v8envy 03-05-11 11:23 AM

OK great tool and all but I don't have specific wheels in mind, I want the widest front and rear tires I can get with a stock suspension on a 93 base model. I've seen 285 all around but I dont want rub and I dont want to roll my fenders. oh and I don't have $5000 to spend on wheels I want some off the shelf wheels with lots of rubber can anyone help, thanks?

WKD 08-09-12 03:41 PM

This "Question Eliminator" link doesn't work
 
None of the fitment links on this forum seem to be working.

PureMdMa 10-31-12 11:35 AM

Yeah it would be nice if this was available again.

Yh8t 11-02-12 01:43 AM

Can someone tell me if I can fit these wheels on my 1985 gsl se. The wheels I want to put on are 15x7 et +9.. I plugged it into the configuration table but I don't understand it. Thank you very much in advance.
Marco


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:31 PM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands