Suspension/Wheels/Tires/Brakes

The Official FC Wheel Fitment Thread

Old Jan 9, 2006 | 11:27 AM
  #1051  
J.T.P.'s Avatar
Hot Line
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,520
Likes: 1
From: Covina, CA
Originally Posted by Catharsis
it will fit without rolling whatsoever. a 10j with around the same offset will work also
even with running a 255? just asking.. it seems like the tire will be muffin-top on that rim though, sticking out further than the rim... just a thought, i haven't seen a 255 on a 9.5 only on a 10 and it's pretty much a straight up sidewall...
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2006 | 11:55 AM
  #1052  
bacek's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 664
Likes: 1
From: los angeles
isnt 10'' in the back max without rolling fenders?
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2006 | 05:23 PM
  #1053  
Rxmfn7's Avatar
Do a barrel roll!
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 7,529
Likes: 2
From: Lower Burrell, PA
On a 17x9.5 with 35mm offset you can run a 275/40r17 out back, Id recommend rolling the fenders, but *probably* wont be necessary. A 255 will fit no problem.
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2006 | 10:10 PM
  #1054  
Funkspectrum's Avatar
Moderator
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 4,683
Likes: 30
From: Santa Rosa, CA
I'm planning on running 17x8.5 front and 17x9.5 rear. what offset should I go with? The wheels I'm looking at are available in a +15/+25/+35 front and +30/+35 rear....what is the best combo??
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2006 | 10:33 PM
  #1055  
BoostedRex's Avatar
NorCal 7's Co-founder
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,130
Likes: 5
From: Rocklin, CA
Nader, you're going to need the +35 for the front and I'd say either one of the offsets for the rear would be just fine. What rims are you looking at getting??

Zach
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2006 | 11:46 PM
  #1056  
Funkspectrum's Avatar
Moderator
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 4,683
Likes: 30
From: Santa Rosa, CA
Originally Posted by BoostedRex
Nader, you're going to need the +35 for the front and I'd say either one of the offsets for the rear would be just fine. What rims are you looking at getting??

Zach
I'm prolly gonna get these ones...

http://www.m2-hanbai.com/m2_new/M2_H...peD/04-v1.html
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2006 | 05:41 AM
  #1057  
RETed's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 22
From: n
Originally Posted by Funkspectrum
I'm planning on running 17x8.5 front and 17x9.5 rear. what offset should I go with? The wheels I'm looking at are available in a +15/+25/+35 front and +30/+35 rear....what is the best combo??
I'd go 8.5", +25 front and 9.5", +30 rear.


-Ted
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2006 | 08:34 PM
  #1058  
Catharsis's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
From: Eugene, Oregon
Originally Posted by BoostinmyS5
even with running a 255? just asking.. it seems like the tire will be muffin-top on that rim though, sticking out further than the rim... just a thought, i haven't seen a 255 on a 9.5 only on a 10 and it's pretty much a straight up sidewall...
when i bought my car it has 17x9 +35 with 255 on it, they fit fine with plenty of room for more wheel actually
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2006 | 10:38 PM
  #1059  
RyoFC3S's Avatar
S5 TII
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 826
Likes: 0
From: Denver, CO
Hey guys.

I'm really kinda in the dark about wheel fitament, so I was hoping you could help me out. (Ted especially!)

I was wondering about some wheels that I want and which of the following would fit the best. I want to go with 17s, and dont mind if the front wheels are skinner than the rear. If they wont fit directly, it'd be awesome if you could let me know if i could use some small spacers to make them work. Ive been looking forever for a very particular wheel and I finally found it so I really want to make it work.

I would also like to have as wide of tires as possible while still fitting within the stock wheel well (250-300Rear, 225-240 Front?). I dont know if it matters but coilovers will be in the rear & front before these are installed (helps with clearance issues?). Also, I think these wheels were designed for FWD drive cars so i'm aware that the offsets are a little on the high side.

The Sizes & Offsets (bolt pattern is right for all of these):

17x8.5 -- +35, 48mm
17x8 -- +35, 48mm
17x7.5 -- +45, 48mm

Thanks a lot!

-Andrew

P.S.: Oh yeah, Im not sure how vital it is.. but the hub bore is a little different for all of these. They range from 73 for the 8.5s to 67.1 for the 7.5s.

Last edited by RyoFC3S; Jan 10, 2006 at 10:46 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2006 | 11:42 PM
  #1060  
Catharsis's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
From: Eugene, Oregon
17x8.5 all the way around +35 all th way around is the best but still weak...
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2006 | 12:28 AM
  #1061  
RETed's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 22
From: n
Originally Posted by RyoFC3S
17x8.5 -- +35, 48mm
17x8 -- +35, 48mm
17x7.5 -- +45, 48mm
Out of all of those, the 17" x 8.0", +35 has the best chance to fit up front.
I still think it's too tight of a fitment, and be prepared to use a thin spacer to clear everything inside.
225 / 45 / 17 fits no problem on a 8.0" wide rim.
You can go with a 235 / 40 / 17, but you get tight up front.

In the rears, 17" x 8.5", +35 no problem.
255 / 40 / 17 back there no problem.


P.S.: Oh yeah, Im not sure how vital it is.. but the hub bore is a little different for all of these. They range from 73 for the 8.5s to 67.1 for the 7.5s.
Don't worry about bore size.
The FC has one of the smallest bores in the industry...something like 59mm?


-Ted
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2006 | 01:08 AM
  #1062  
Catharsis's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
From: Eugene, Oregon
its not going to be a tight fit on a 235 and the 8.5 will work fine, with anything less than say a 9j there isnt much of a reason to staggar on these cars.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2006 | 05:31 PM
  #1063  
BASTARD's Avatar
®
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,282
Likes: 3
From: NorCal
Originally Posted by Funkspectrum
so... +35 on a 17x9.5 won't fit under the rear of the FC, even with rolling the fenders?
I had 17x10 +35 on the back with a 255/40, could have run a 265 if you could find one

and

17x8's +35 in the front with 235/40, I think a 8.5 would fit
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2006 | 01:52 AM
  #1064  
Funkspectrum's Avatar
Moderator
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 4,683
Likes: 30
From: Santa Rosa, CA
Originally Posted by RETed
I'd go 8.5", +25 front and 9.5", +30 rear.


-Ted

Thanks Ted! That's the setup I was leaning towards...
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2006 | 11:46 PM
  #1065  
Pat McGroin's Avatar
Sushi ******!
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 597
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Originally Posted by BASTARD
I had 17x10 +35 on the back with a 255/40, could have run a 265 if you could find one

and

17x8's +35 in the front with 235/40, I think a 8.5 would fit

How well did the 235/40 run up front and rubbing under hard cornering? I plan on running the exact same setup on the front, same offset as well. Also running Koni yellows/ GC coilovers.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2006 | 02:41 AM
  #1066  
Catharsis's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
From: Eugene, Oregon
17x9 +35 will fit up front with a 235
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2006 | 09:54 AM
  #1067  
RETed's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 22
From: n
Originally Posted by Catharsis
17x9 +35 will fit up front with a 235
http://www.wheelsmaster.com/rt_specs.jsp

Assuming 235 / 40 / 17 tire...

Package is 10 mm (0.4'') closer to suspension/brakes components. Acceptable for most cars.

Package will stick out 20 mm (0.8'') farther. Make sure that you have enough room under the fender. If not, consider narrower tires or higher offset.
You sure about that???


-Ted
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2006 | 10:31 AM
  #1068  
Catharsis's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
From: Eugene, Oregon
yes with a 40 wall
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2006 | 10:38 AM
  #1069  
J.T.P.'s Avatar
Hot Line
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,520
Likes: 1
From: Covina, CA
Originally Posted by RETed
http://www.wheelsmaster.com/rt_specs.jsp

Assuming 235 / 40 / 17 tire...



You sure about that???


-Ted

hey, thats a good link Ted!! but they won't let u stretch a tire... ahahhaa i try putting a 225/45/17 on a 17x10, but they bump the tire up to a 255.... i guess the person that made that program was a grip driver!! hahahahaaa

Last edited by J.T.P.; Jan 13, 2006 at 10:43 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2006 | 01:25 PM
  #1070  
rxspinner's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
From: Sarasota, Florida
Awesome thread. After searching and reviewing it all, I'm planning to buy some used Mustang GT wheels (17x8 w/ 30mm offset) and 225/45x17 Victoracers for my autocross setup. Anyone have any experience with this fitment?

I gather from the thread that I might be better served with an offset closer to 35mm, but I haven't been able to find any lightweight 17x8 wheels with this offsett for a reasonable price. If anyone has some info on that, I'd appreciate it.

What are others running for autocross in BSP class?
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2006 | 06:26 PM
  #1071  
Uechi's Avatar
FC3S GT-X
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: Canada, BC
Hi, I need some reassurance!
I'm planning on getting a set of 16x8 +40 wheels front and back, these fit on a 1990 FC right? what tire size should I be looking at? planning on stock 205/55, or should i go with 225, or does that even fit?
Thanks for your guys' time.
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2006 | 06:57 PM
  #1072  
Uechi's Avatar
FC3S GT-X
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: Canada, BC
oh crap sorry, i meant +30 offset
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2006 | 07:31 PM
  #1073  
Black91n/a's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 5,707
Likes: 6
From: BC, Canada
Mustang GT wheels fit just fine with a 225/45/17, I've got that and I track and autoross it and have never had any issues. You may want to get ARP studs though (especially with R's and autocross or track driving), as the stock ones are a little short, and you should get centering rings for them.
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2006 | 12:21 AM
  #1074  
koopz's Avatar
Rotang Enthuesiest!
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
From: Victoria B.C. Canada
Hello I recently picked up a stagger'd set of rims for my RX, only problem is I dont know exactly if they will fit and if they will fit why tries would be appropiate to run. I read throught the first 10 pages of this spot and gave up as I could not find what i was looking for and there is no search thread feature other then Ctrl+F

Well here is what I have acquired...

Two 17x8 +32mm Offset wheels,
And Two 17x9 +45mm offset wheels.

They are Starform Basel 7's? wheels and they recently came off a FD so I know the bolt patter in correct.

I have not fit them to my car yet as they need new tires...
My questions...
1)What tires would I be looking for?
2)Do I need any spacers to make these wheels fit properly with no running?
Any information would be greatly appreciated!!
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2006 | 02:32 AM
  #1075  
Funkspectrum's Avatar
Moderator
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 4,683
Likes: 30
From: Santa Rosa, CA
Originally Posted by RETed
I'd go 8.5", +25 front and 9.5", +30 rear.


-Ted

Yo Ted, you think i'd need to roll or widen the fenders with those widths and offsets? If I have to I will, but i'd like to keep it as stock as possible.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:33 AM.