Single Turbo RX-7's Questions about all aspects of single turbo setups.

Shift point for stock FD engine with single turbo?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-22-17, 08:16 PM
  #26  
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary

Thread Starter
 
Valkyrie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Japanabama
Posts: 4,731
Received 87 Likes on 63 Posts
How in the hell are stock twins making over 400 whp? lol

More than power, I mostly bought a single car with a v-mount because I didn't want to have to deal with the complexity of the stock twins or the inadequacy of the stock cooling system.

The car was actually tuned very conservatively (11.6 psi) to keep things from breaking.
Old 06-22-17, 09:24 PM
  #27  
Rotary Motoring

iTrader: (9)
 
BLUE TII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: CA
Posts: 8,209
Received 763 Likes on 505 Posts
Valkyrie
How in the hell are stock twins making over 400 whp? lol
Pretty crazy power with just bolt ons/porting.

Tom ran 10.8et in the 1/4 mile too!

https://www.rx7club.com/time-slips-d...turbos-954861/
Old 06-23-17, 02:40 AM
  #28  
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary

Thread Starter
 
Valkyrie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Japanabama
Posts: 4,731
Received 87 Likes on 63 Posts
22 psi... that's a lot, right? lol

I kind of figured porting was involved.

My low-end torque is so bad I wouldn't even dream of porting. I practically have to floor it to get it loaded on the transporter...
Old 06-23-17, 07:33 AM
  #29  
rotorhead

iTrader: (3)
 
arghx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: cold
Posts: 16,182
Received 429 Likes on 263 Posts
harder you push those stock turbos, the shorter they will last.
Old 06-23-17, 12:29 PM
  #30  
Rotary Motoring

iTrader: (9)
 
BLUE TII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: CA
Posts: 8,209
Received 763 Likes on 505 Posts
Put this cammed 436rwhp LS2 dyno in-




With the stock M12 T56 gearing and stock (this was 6.0 GTO) 3.46 rear you can see the torque at the wheels is really low.

But, in auto-x (2nd gear) the LS2 would have better acceleration than the rotaries in 2nd gear from 65mph to 70mph, but it is really getting worked over under 65mph.




I did the LS2 with T56 and 3.9 rear to give it more torque.

For auto-x 2nd is now too short ending at 60mph, but you could extend revs to 7krpm if you threw some valvetrain in there when you did the cam and ECU tuning. Probably still too short and you would have to use 3rd gear too.

Good news is now the LS would accelerate better 45mph to 60mph than the rotary and at no point does the stock twins make more torque (single is still making more torque under 45mph and then again over 60mph, but hey that **** is going to blow up soon.) Of course 60mph to 70mph now has much less torque than either rotary because 3rd gear.




Now I see why the V8s hook up so well in 1st on slicks at the drag strip- they have much less torque in 1st gear!
Attached Thumbnails Shift point for stock FD engine with single turbo?-ls2-cam-dyno.jpg   Shift point for stock FD engine with single turbo?-tq-wheels-3.46.jpg   Shift point for stock FD engine with single turbo?-tq-wheels-3.90.jpg  

Last edited by BLUE TII; 06-23-17 at 12:34 PM.
Old 06-24-17, 12:27 PM
  #31  
~17 MPG

iTrader: (2)
 
scotty305's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Bend, OR
Posts: 3,281
Received 224 Likes on 151 Posts
I'm loving these Torque at wheels charts. I imagine 3.9 gears should let the single turbo rotary deliver more power to the ground between 30-70mph than the other two setups, assuming you don't get stuck needing to shift into 1st on low-speed corners.
Old 06-24-17, 04:41 PM
  #32  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!

 
RGHTBrainDesign's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 1,666
Received 82 Likes on 75 Posts
Originally Posted by BLUE TII
Put this cammed 436rwhp LS2 dyno in-




With the stock M12 T56 gearing and stock (this was 6.0 GTO) 3.46 rear you can see the torque at the wheels is really low.

But, in auto-x (2nd gear) the LS2 would have better acceleration than the rotaries in 2nd gear from 65mph to 70mph, but it is really getting worked over under 65mph.




I did the LS2 with T56 and 3.9 rear to give it more torque.

For auto-x 2nd is now too short ending at 60mph, but you could extend revs to 7krpm if you threw some valvetrain in there when you did the cam and ECU tuning. Probably still too short and you would have to use 3rd gear too.

Good news is now the LS would accelerate better 45mph to 60mph than the rotary and at no point does the stock twins make more torque (single is still making more torque under 45mph and then again over 60mph, but hey that **** is going to blow up soon.) Of course 60mph to 70mph now has much less torque than either rotary because 3rd gear.




Now I see why the V8s hook up so well in 1st on slicks at the drag strip- they have much less torque in 1st gear!
Hey Ian, wanna post up your 7670 with a 4.56 FD ratio and 23.75" or 25" rear tire height and see how the overlay is? :P
Old 06-26-17, 11:59 AM
  #33  
Rotary Motoring

iTrader: (9)
 
BLUE TII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: CA
Posts: 8,209
Received 763 Likes on 505 Posts
SirLaughsALot
Hey Ian, wanna post up your 7670 with a 4.56 FD ratio and 23.75" or 25" rear tire height and see how the overlay is? :P
Not sure exactly what you want to compare, so here is a variety.

Here is the
419rwhp EFR 7670 w/ S5/S6 USDM trans & 4.10 & 25" tire in Black
419rwhp EFR 7670 w/ S5/S6 USDM trans & 3.46 & 25" tire in Orange
436rwhp Cammed LS2 w/ M12 T56 & 3.46 & 25" tire in Blue



Here is the
419rwhp EFR 7670 w/ S5/S6 USDM trans & 4.10 & 25" tire in Black
419rwhp EFR 7670 w/ M12 T56 & 3.46 & 25" tire in Orange
436rwhp Cammed LS2 w/ M12 T56 & 3.46 & 25" tire in Blue



Here is just the
419rwhp EFR 7670 w/ M12 T56 & 3.46 & 25" tire in Orange
436rwhp Cammed LS2 w/ M12 T56 & 3.46 & 25" tire in Blue


As you can see, the higher rpm you can make torque the more torque at the wheels with gearing.

That is why Horsepower is the factor affecting acceleration (Horsepower is simply a function of Torque and RPM).
Attached Thumbnails Shift point for stock FD engine with single turbo?-7670-4.36-vs-ls2.jpg   Shift point for stock FD engine with single turbo?-7670-t56-4.36-vs-ls2.jpg   Shift point for stock FD engine with single turbo?-just-7670-t56-4.36-vs-ls2.jpg  

Last edited by BLUE TII; 06-26-17 at 12:03 PM.
Old 06-26-17, 01:02 PM
  #34  
Rotary Motoring

iTrader: (9)
 
BLUE TII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: CA
Posts: 8,209
Received 763 Likes on 505 Posts
Here is an interesting one.

P.A.R dog gears in FD stock case with 4.77 final drive.



Doesn't alter max acceleration line much at all (that is an arc drawn along the outer Right side of graph), but it would be very forgiving for what gear you are in (lots of torque overlap).
Attached Thumbnails Shift point for stock FD engine with single turbo?-7670-par-gears.jpg  
The following users liked this post:
RGHTBrainDesign (06-26-17)
Old 06-26-17, 02:26 PM
  #35  
Senior Member

 
Vicoor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Manassas
Posts: 434
Received 15 Likes on 11 Posts
Basically, for optimum acceleration, you should shift when the wheel torque in the current gear drops off to match the wheel torque in the next gear.

And that will definitely change based on modifications.


I've seen very few Dyno charts that showed an engine that should be shifted at 9000rpm, power drops off too much that high.
The following 2 users liked this post by Vicoor:
arghx (06-29-17), BLUE TII (06-26-17)
Old 07-13-17, 07:35 PM
  #36  
Junior Member
 
coleparker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Knoxville, Tennessee
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Vicoor
Basically, for optimum acceleration, you should shift when the wheel torque in the current gear drops off to match the wheel torque in the next gear.

And that will definitely change based on modifications.


I've seen very few Dyno charts that showed an engine that should be shifted at 9000rpm, power drops off too much that high.
agree completely.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:36 PM.