EFR 8474's and 9274's
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
EFR 8474's and 9274's
Saw them at SEMA and talked to the reps a bit about them.
The compressor map looked very different (flow more at lower pressures), even though both the comp and turbine wheels are the same physical sizes, they have a very different characteristics.
The key take-away is that they are less diesel focused (e.g. 50 PSI) and more oriented for the street/gas performance applications.
@Turblown, any info on availability and more details?
The compressor map looked very different (flow more at lower pressures), even though both the comp and turbine wheels are the same physical sizes, they have a very different characteristics.
The key take-away is that they are less diesel focused (e.g. 50 PSI) and more oriented for the street/gas performance applications.
@Turblown, any info on availability and more details?
#3
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
I'll be doing a write-up for them later this week for Full-Race.com.
Essentially the compressor ratio itself from Inducer and Exducer are dramatically changed, but they are still B2 Frame Turbochargers.
9280 vs. 9180 = Same 91mm Exducer, but 9280 has 74mm Inducer and 9180 has 68mm Inducer.
9274 vs. 9174 = Same 91mm Exducer, but 9274 has 74mm Inducer and 9174 has 68mm Inducer.
8474 vs. 8374 = Same 84mm Exducer, but 8474 has 68mm Inducer and 8374 has 62mm Inducer.
I can get more into details later, but that's the gist of it. The effects, we'll wait and see.
Essentially the compressor ratio itself from Inducer and Exducer are dramatically changed, but they are still B2 Frame Turbochargers.
9280 vs. 9180 = Same 91mm Exducer, but 9280 has 74mm Inducer and 9180 has 68mm Inducer.
9274 vs. 9174 = Same 91mm Exducer, but 9274 has 74mm Inducer and 9174 has 68mm Inducer.
8474 vs. 8374 = Same 84mm Exducer, but 8474 has 68mm Inducer and 8374 has 62mm Inducer.
I can get more into details later, but that's the gist of it. The effects, we'll wait and see.
The following users liked this post:
KNONFS (11-07-18)
#4
Arrogant Wankeler
More shaft speed required (before approaching choke flow) for the same boost but significantly more flow. Should be slightly less responsive but allow more power on the same frame size for the boost levels most people are running on street/track/standing half/mile events.
Be interesting to see 9280 vs sxe369 & sxe372 for the guys who wanted a touch more than the efrs could provide previously. Still a big price difference.
Be interesting to see 9280 vs sxe369 & sxe372 for the guys who wanted a touch more than the efrs could provide previously. Still a big price difference.
Last edited by Slides; 11-06-18 at 09:24 PM. Reason: Clarification
The following users liked this post:
KNONFS (11-07-18)
#5
More shaft speed required for the same boost but significantly more flow. Should be slightly less responsive but allow more power on the same frame size for the boost levels most people are running on street/track/standling half/mile events.
Be interesting to see 9280 vs sxe369 & sxe372 for the guys who wanted a touch more than the efrs could provide previously. Still a big price difference.
Be interesting to see 9280 vs sxe369 & sxe372 for the guys who wanted a touch more than the efrs could provide previously. Still a big price difference.
BW takes a long time usually to put stuff on the shelves, so I wouldn't hold your breathe for any real world results anytime soon..
Trending Topics
#9
I just ran a street-ported 8374 on the dyno a couple days ago with zero surge( OEM medium actuator, 3" exhaust, E85, seeing 20 psi by 3400rpms).
#10
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
I have all of the compressor maps... They're in my brochure right here in front of me. I guess I could snag a few pictures for y'all.
The following users liked this post:
R_PROWESS (11-07-18)
#12
Rotary Enthusiast
instead of using 8474 or 9274 which i imagine would increase lag, wouldn't it accomplish the same thing by using one of the similarly sized SXE turbo? those have abit more lag but have a wider compressor map area interms of the surgeline.
My 2nd question for the experienced tuner, if let's say you went with a EFR8374, and you experienced surge at low rpm, would you be able to tune the boost control to remedy that?
My 2nd question for the experienced tuner, if let's say you went with a EFR8374, and you experienced surge at low rpm, would you be able to tune the boost control to remedy that?
The following users liked this post:
Brettus (11-27-18)
#23
We've also changed the turbine discharge to be interlocking, so people can use the Tial downpipe flanges. We've made other additional changes like removing excess material, and smoothing out areas inside etc.
Seeing as these new EFRs will be laggier, this should help compensate.
#24
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think bigger the inducer to exducer ratio then more that it flows at the lower pressures. The idea is that these will make a lot more power in the 15-25psi range where most people run these.
I'll be doing a write-up for them later this week for Full-Race.com.
Essentially the compressor ratio itself from Inducer and Exducer are dramatically changed, but they are still B2 Frame Turbochargers.
9280 vs. 9180 = Same 91mm Exducer, but 9280 has 74mm Inducer and 9180 has 68mm Inducer.
9274 vs. 9174 = Same 91mm Exducer, but 9274 has 74mm Inducer and 9174 has 68mm Inducer.
8474 vs. 8374 = Same 84mm Exducer, but 8474 has 68mm Inducer and 8374 has 62mm Inducer.
I can get more into details later, but that's the gist of it. The effects, we'll wait and see.
Essentially the compressor ratio itself from Inducer and Exducer are dramatically changed, but they are still B2 Frame Turbochargers.
9280 vs. 9180 = Same 91mm Exducer, but 9280 has 74mm Inducer and 9180 has 68mm Inducer.
9274 vs. 9174 = Same 91mm Exducer, but 9274 has 74mm Inducer and 9174 has 68mm Inducer.
8474 vs. 8374 = Same 84mm Exducer, but 8474 has 68mm Inducer and 8374 has 62mm Inducer.
I can get more into details later, but that's the gist of it. The effects, we'll wait and see.
#25
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
@Turblown, cool innovations as always.. These may not necessarily be much "laggier", since they will be delivering more air at lower pressures, but rather a more linear power delivery which is what we can hope for. Thanks for pitching in!
It definitely requires tuning, which is why we also cast EMAP bungs into the turbine housing, and recommend using the shaft speed sensors.
We've also changed the turbine discharge to be interlocking, so people can use the Tial downpipe flanges. We've made other additional changes like removing excess material, and smoothing out areas inside etc.
Seeing as these new EFRs will be laggier, this should help compensate.
We've also changed the turbine discharge to be interlocking, so people can use the Tial downpipe flanges. We've made other additional changes like removing excess material, and smoothing out areas inside etc.
Seeing as these new EFRs will be laggier, this should help compensate.