Single Turbo RX-7's Questions about all aspects of single turbo setups.

8374 iwg turbo pros and cons

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-30-17, 07:57 PM
  #1  
Rotary Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
spintriangles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: fl
Posts: 910
Received 216 Likes on 164 Posts
8374 iwg turbo pros and cons

I currently run a pte 1ar 6262 bb/divided manifold dual wastegate to atmosphere. Its a pretty good set up but i am always nervous about those dual wastegates and at 12 lbs of boost the engine sounds like i am going to break it. I am sure it is not going to break but all the noise from the two wastegates gives the car a different sound. At higher boost 18lbs it does not sound as different. Full boost is at about 3400 rpm but i keep reading the hype on these borg warner turbos. I also hear problems with boost creep. Are these turbos that great. Pros and cons please.
Old 12-01-17, 07:57 AM
  #2  
Senior Member

iTrader: (7)
 
Brilliant7-LFC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 694
Received 31 Likes on 26 Posts
EFR turbos are the best thing on the market right now. They have IWG and EWG options. Which one you would choose has to do with your desired boost levels.

They have been proven to spool faster than anything else out there and pull just as hard as anything out there all the way to redline. They are, in a word - superior in every way.

I do not have any first hand experience with them. But, if it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck and 100 people tell you it’s a duck, then it’s gotta be a duck right?

Nick
The following users liked this post:
FourtyOunce (12-01-17)
Old 12-01-17, 08:15 AM
  #3  
Rotary Freak

iTrader: (15)
 
FourtyOunce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Old Bridge, NJ
Posts: 2,007
Received 175 Likes on 105 Posts
Originally Posted by Brilliant7-LFC
EFR turbos are the best thing on the market right now. They have IWG and EWG options. Which one you would choose has to do with your desired boost levels.

They have been proven to spool faster than anything else out there and pull just as hard as anything out there all the way to redline. They are, in a word - superior in every way.

I do not have any first hand experience with them. But, if it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck and 100 people tell you it’s a duck, then it’s gotta be a duck right?

Nick
Superior in most ways... However, I've yet to see pricing on repair/replacement in the cases where an apex seal decides to take an exit, aimed directly at the turbine wheels. Cost may also be a hurdle.

With that said, I've recently upgraded to an 8374 ewg and looking forward to getting the car running.
Old 12-01-17, 08:29 AM
  #4  
Senior Member

iTrader: (7)
 
Brilliant7-LFC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 694
Received 31 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally Posted by FourtyOunce
Superior in most ways... However, I've yet to see pricing on repair/replacement in the cases where an apex seal decides to take an exit, aimed directly at the turbine wheels. Cost may also be a hurdle.

With that said, I've recently upgraded to an 8374 ewg and looking forward to getting the car running.
Jehan is probably right there. The cost of replacing a turbine wheel or a cartridge on one of these might be pretty expensive, but I would argue it’s not any more or less expensive than a GTX Garrett. Traditionally, BW’s have been on average less expensive than their Garrett counterparts, generally speaking.

Nick
Old 12-01-17, 07:04 PM
  #5  
Rotary Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
spintriangles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: fl
Posts: 910
Received 216 Likes on 164 Posts
I wonder

Can it hold low boost without over boost issues. I have a 4 inch downpipe. 12 psi low boost and high boost 18. I hear alot of people complain about boost spike. I do have a greddy profec turbo boost controller. Thoughts?
Old 12-01-17, 08:27 PM
  #6  
Time or Money, Pick one

iTrader: (36)
 
silverTRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Torrance, ca.
Posts: 3,347
Received 154 Likes on 125 Posts
What’s your port? Large with a 4”dp I would imagine. I say no chance of holding 12 psi with an iwg 8374.
Old 12-01-17, 09:04 PM
  #7  
Rotary Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
spintriangles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: fl
Posts: 910
Received 216 Likes on 164 Posts
Ported

Jesus Padilla at Kilo Racing professionally built the engine. I know he did a street port but dont know how mild or wild that port is.
Old 12-02-17, 01:02 PM
  #8  
Rotary Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
spintriangles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: fl
Posts: 910
Received 216 Likes on 164 Posts
I have a greddys latest electronic boost controller. When you say no way to hold under 12lbs are you saying even the boost controller cant manage it?
Old 12-02-17, 02:57 PM
  #9  
Instrument Of G0D.


iTrader: (1)
 
WANKfactor's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: omnipresent
Posts: 1,540
Received 978 Likes on 736 Posts
Boost controllers cant make boost lower, only higher.
Old 12-02-17, 04:42 PM
  #10  
Rotary Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
spintriangles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: fl
Posts: 910
Received 216 Likes on 164 Posts
I am not a mechanic but if i understand it correctly boost controller controls wastegates which controls boost. I control how much boost presure my turbo pushes. Low boost 12 and high boost 18. Not sure why i could not do the same with a borg warner
Old 12-02-17, 04:58 PM
  #11  
Instrument Of G0D.


iTrader: (1)
 
WANKfactor's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: omnipresent
Posts: 1,540
Received 978 Likes on 736 Posts
You can only go as low as your wastegate flows. Lets say for example your current set up has 12lb wastegate springs and flows 12psi without the boost controller, the boost controller can only do 12psi or higher. Only way to go lower is to mechanically alter your wastegate set up, with softer springs, bigger wastegate, more exhaust restriction, etc.
People have been reporting problems running low boost on efr8375iwg. Solution seems to be porting out the wastegate volutes or intentionally restricting the exhaust.
I have a ewg efr8376 on my car. It is a very good turbo. But if your set up aint broke, dont fix it unless there is something about it that is really annoying you. Maybe look into plumb back waste gate?
Old 12-03-17, 01:52 PM
  #12  
Rotary Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
spintriangles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: fl
Posts: 910
Received 216 Likes on 164 Posts
I got it. My setup is pretty good. I do like the suplicity of the borg iwg though. I may feel a little more comfortable with my setup once i get a little more tunning done. With the two wastegates i always nervous that one runner may go lean while the other is good to go as far as afr. I am highly thinking of getting tune plus egt on both rotors done while tunning just to be safe
Old 12-04-17, 09:05 AM
  #13  
Sponsor
iTrader: (41)
 
IRPerformance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 11,347
Received 317 Likes on 190 Posts
EFR turbos are the best thing out right now in my opinion as far as turbos go. Ceramic ball bearings, billet wheel compressor, titanium turbine, stainless exhaust housing are all far newer technology than many other turbos. We generally see 15 psi by 3000 rpm or sooner with a 8374 and can easily break 400 whp on pump gas alone. they tend to make more torque and a flatter curve as well. The nice thing about them is the wastegate, bov, and boost control can all be integrated. Internal wastegate versions are nice and quiet. Boost control is largely affected by manifold design. We have no issues holding 8 lbs of boost with our equal length manifold on a ported motor with a full 3" exhaust.
Attached Thumbnails 8374 iwg turbo pros and cons-23722720_1593028980719955_7719100344070929220_n.jpg   8374 iwg turbo pros and cons-21751921_1542149119141275_4913632184664862656_n.jpg   8374 iwg turbo pros and cons-21686239_1542149099141277_854916783885630809_n.jpg  

Last edited by IRPerformance; 12-04-17 at 09:12 AM.
Old 12-04-17, 10:31 AM
  #14  
Rotary Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
spintriangles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: fl
Posts: 910
Received 216 Likes on 164 Posts
May be my next setup

Complaints about my current set up. Soinds like the car is going to break when i get into the boost between 4k and 7k in the rpm. Dual wastegates are loud maybe thats why it feels this way. It just feels hard on the motor although it may not be. Smell of fuel from the dual dumps inside engine bay. Complicated with two wastegates. Pros That angry sound on boost. Spool and power is great also and no boost creep. I love the way the borg seems to boost they sound so smooth and dont sonund like they are hurting the engine. i am leaning on borg warner iwg but i am on hold for the budget for this car. This year and next year have already been caculated on paint and suspension. Just doing my research so i may put it into the budget for 2019
Old 12-04-17, 11:00 AM
  #15  
Sponsor
iTrader: (41)
 
IRPerformance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 11,347
Received 317 Likes on 190 Posts
External dumped wastegates are loud. No complete way around it., If you already have wastegates, a bov, and boost controller it seams expensive to buy a EFR turbo. But considering the cost of purchasing those components separately the EFR is actually a good deal as all those are integrated. You could always sell your existing parts.
Old 12-04-17, 11:10 AM
  #16  
Rotary Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
spintriangles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: fl
Posts: 910
Received 216 Likes on 164 Posts
Wieght

Is there any wieght savings with the borg iwg? Does it sit lower? Selling my setup right now is not an option at this point. I am sure i would have to wait for a buyer and although it is a custom aspec turbo kit i would also have to change my down pipe,re tune and install $$$$$. It is a budget thing at this point. My setup is only one year old. Does this system help with the smell of fuel in the cabin? I have heard a lot of pros are there any cons with the borg iwg?
Old 12-04-17, 02:08 PM
  #17  
Sponsor
iTrader: (41)
 
IRPerformance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 11,347
Received 317 Likes on 190 Posts
Slightly less weight due to the stainless housing. You can save even more weight by opting for the aluminum chra. You will most likely need a completely new turbo kit. The EFR needs more clearance because of the external wastegate actuator. The discharge vband is also proprietary. A downpipe with a standard 3" vband flange will not bolt up correctly. A catless rx7 will also have some fuel smell, but this can vary significantly depending on the quality of your tune. Discharging wastegates under the car instead of behind it will amplify how much fuel smell you get in the cabin.

Last edited by IRPerformance; 12-04-17 at 02:11 PM.
Old 12-04-17, 02:34 PM
  #18  
Rotary Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
spintriangles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: fl
Posts: 910
Received 216 Likes on 164 Posts
Cons?

Is there any cons besides me having to spending money
Old 12-05-17, 09:52 AM
  #19  
Sponsor
iTrader: (41)
 
IRPerformance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 11,347
Received 317 Likes on 190 Posts
Originally Posted by spintriangles
Is there any cons besides me having to spending money
None that I can see. You'll get excellent response, superior transient boost, and a nice flat torque curve. Its the best street turbo out right now in my opinion.
Old 12-06-17, 09:32 AM
  #20  
Spin 2 Win

iTrader: (3)
 
Lavitzlegend's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Iowa
Posts: 318
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
It really sounds like you are struggling with the idea of having a really good setup versus having the best setup. If you're asking whether the EFR 8374 is better than your 6262 everyone is going to say yes. However, you already have your setup installed and working which should have a fair amount of weight in your decision making process. Why go through all the money and time and potential for failure to switch turbos if you would be happy with your current setup after plumbing the wastegates back into the exhaust instead of venting to atmosphere? It would not cost you much money or time to do that and if you're still not happy afterwards you can just start saving for an EFR kit
Old 12-06-17, 11:56 AM
  #21  
Rotary Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
spintriangles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: fl
Posts: 910
Received 216 Likes on 164 Posts
True

I think you are right. My setup is good but like most of us fd owners good is never good enough. I am fighting myself and trying to be happy with my descent setup. I do see myself changing setups in the future which hints the starting of this thread. Rerouting the wastegates is a smart option but i dont want to loose 25 to 30 rwhp. Damn fd owners. Lol
Old 12-06-17, 01:16 PM
  #22  
F'n Newbie...

iTrader: (6)
 
fendamonky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Nokesville, Va
Posts: 3,928
Received 313 Likes on 228 Posts
Originally Posted by spintriangles
I think you are right. My setup is good but like most of us fd owners good is never good enough. I am fighting myself and trying to be happy with my descent setup. I do see myself changing setups in the future which hints the starting of this thread. Rerouting the wastegates is a smart option but i dont want to loose 25 to 30 rwhp. Damn fd owners. Lol
Wait, what?!?
Old 12-06-17, 05:23 PM
  #23  
Rotary Motoring

iTrader: (9)
 
BLUE TII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: CA
Posts: 8,209
Received 763 Likes on 505 Posts
fendamonky
Quote:
Originally Posted by spintriangles I think you are right. My setup is good but like most of us fd owners good is never good enough. I am fighting myself and trying to be happy with my descent setup. I do see myself changing setups in the future which hints the starting of this thread. Rerouting the wastegates is a smart option but i dont want to loose 25 to 30 rwhp. Damn fd owners. Lol
Wait, what?!?
Over the years there have been several threads by owners that have dynoed their RX-7s before and after re-routing the wastegate back into the downpipe and 25-30rwhp is the normal loss in power on a ~400rwhp rotary.

I imagine there is at least that much loss in power between IWG and EWG EFR turbos as well.

Possibly more since it is 0.92AR IWG versus 1.05 or 1.45AR EWG exhaust housings with the EFRs.
Old 12-06-17, 06:15 PM
  #24  
Sponsor
iTrader: (41)
 
IRPerformance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 11,347
Received 317 Likes on 190 Posts
25-30hp loss when rerouting the wastegate at the 500hp level seems to be the norm all other factors remaining consistent. The biggest reason for this is the turbulence introduced into the system and it can vary significantly depending on how the wastegate is rerouted. If the system is designed from the start to be recirculated, then the loss may not be as prominent. EFR turbos do tend to take a pound or so more to make the same power as a similar SXE counterpart so some of this still applies. Some ways to get around it is to introduce the wastegate discharge at a smooth transition or go slightly larger on the exhaust. All this being said, the different for the majority of applications is negligible and many prefer a quiet car over a few hp.
Old 12-06-17, 09:48 PM
  #25  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!

 
RGHTBrainDesign's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 1,666
Received 82 Likes on 75 Posts
Originally Posted by BLUE TII


Over the years there have been several threads by owners that have dynoed their RX-7s before and after re-routing the wastegate back into the downpipe and 25-30rwhp is the normal loss in power on a ~400rwhp rotary.

I imagine there is at least that much loss in power between IWG and EWG EFR turbos as well.

Possibly more since it is 0.92AR IWG versus 1.05 or 1.45AR EWG exhaust housings with the EFRs.
I would suspect this being a bigger issue if it's routed earlier than a foot or so after the turbine exit. Should make less of a difference if you put it 2ft away, 3ft, etc, and making sure it meets inline with the charge.

Here's how I'm doing mine.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:11 AM.